HOME | DD
poderiu β Global Warming Hoax
Published: 2009-12-14 02:24:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 1781; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 26
Redirect to original
Description
...Related content
Comments: 17
Perfect!!
Of course, if you listen to the "experts", they say that Official Global Warming Scientists just use those terms in their highly technical e-mails! If anyone truly believes that, just e-mail me, because I have two bridges in New York that I can sell you very cheap.
Keep up the good work!!
π: 0 β©: 2
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 2
This conversation is generalist, not concrete. I am not a scientist, but I made my research and I do follow some arguments that prove that Global Warming Made by Man is really a Oax, starting by that burglar Al Gore. Speking about him, here is a nice news that he was sued by over 30.000 scientists his frauds [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Al Gore being wrong about things doesn't prove it to be a hoax since you still have a majority of scientists supporting it. Just because scientists didn't like the way he presented it doesn't mean it isn't still happening. You can be wrong about certain facts pertaining to global warming that doesn't mean you're wrong about it existing. Try again
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, I am not trying to convince you. Al gore lied; IPCC lied with the famous "Hockey Stick Graphic"; the weather was warmer than now in Medieval Warm Period and man didnΒ΄t release Co2 has today; today man releaces 0,2 Co2 tax, and that is nothing comparing the tax mother earth releases; etc., etc.
I am environmentalist (even vegan) but I donΒ΄t pray to this religion. Wish you a good praying!
π: 0 β©: 1
Well your post pretty much confirmed that you know very little about global warming at all or how it works anyway, so it's kinda funny you judge scientists who know way more about it than you do.
also, if we're the dishonest ones, then why do the "sources" linked to by your fellow GW denier contain viruses: [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
He's censoring all my posts, bro. Looks like you're on your own.
π: 0 β©: 0
Since when did a PhD assure accuracy? The "experts" at East Anglia and elsewhere sure pissed on that cogent argument, didn't they? The IPCC has revised their official position in light of those damning e-mails, what, three times now? What's pathetic is that they did it for money and power, the main two reasons people deceive and lie.
The famous "hockey stick graph" has been proven to be based on sketchy, if not outright fraudulent information. Of course, when asked for the data on which the graph was based, it was conveniently... missing.
It's not just my belief that "the science isn't settled". There is evidence to that fact. I'll side with the real scientists who agree that science is never settled.
You see, people through history like yourself believed that the Flat Earth was the center of the universe, that blood didn't circulate, that women had two more ribs than men and that bad night vapors caused disease. And why? Because the "experts" told them that the science was settled!
If the growing body of evidence was examined that supports the theory that sun-storm and sun-spot activity is the "smoking" gun in climate science, then governments and politicians would lose the ability to tax people and control their lives. These are the same concerned politicians who flew to Copenhagen in private jets and rode in limos and ate fresh oysters flown in from Sri Lanka. You don't think these people are laughing at you? Hell, Lenin called people like you "useful idiots" for a reason.
Oh, have you heard that it's unseasonably cold in South America. Now, it's supposedly "global cooling" caused by CO2!
[link]
[link]
However... if you have the convictions of your beliefs, you need to eschew that commuter, your i-pod, i-phone, plasma-screen TV and all that other electrically-power crap that makes your sad life meaningful. Stop your carbon footprint in its tracks. Eat uncooked food, wear clothes made from naturally-processed, locally-grown fibers and show people you are not a raving, carbon-is-evil hypocrite.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Here's a little more "inconvenient truth" for you:
[link]
Hell, even the IPCC is backing off this bogus sh*t! It appears that "peer-review" among these "scientists" has been something less than honest.
And, what about summer in So-Cal?
[link]
Of course, now that "man-made climate change" has been exposed as another scam, the Left resorts to its favorite tactic.
[link]
Now, when you mention that politicians are they are usually dumb fucks who don't understand shit, then we have some common ground. Superficially, I'd direct your attention to Al Gore and the people he "inspires": [link]
Now, go away... and please, don't watch the Discovery Channel, okay!
Finally, not to part on a sour note, but here is a great academic piece on why "liberalism", as it used to be known died and was replaced by something sinister. [link]
What's funny is that I haven't really changed, except to become more libertarian, which is as close to classic liberalism as we have left after the death of my parents' generation, who embodied the word. When AGW first surfaced, I was concerned, but then I noticed many inconsistencies, and Al Gore's book was so full of lies and half-truths that I started to doubt. Here was a classic case of "follow the money", right to Generation Investments (Mssrs. David Blood and Al Gore). That scientists were seduced by money to report certain data is not debatable (read some of the East-Anglia e-mails).
To quote Monty Python, "Now go away or I will taunt you (with facts) a second time!"
π: 0 β©: 1
Opinion articles? Really? That's the best you can do?
What you have here is scientists criticizing other scientists, which is how scientists work, nowhere did this article disprove global warming however. If something is based on weak evidence scientists will eventually call you out on it regardless of whether or not global warming is true. You don't seem to know how it really works do you? Of course not, you just think everything is a conspiracy against you. 95% of scientists in general in the relevant fields accept climate change as a reality, though of course they won't agree on every aspect of it the fact of the matter is you can't claim they're ALL involved in some giant conspiracy.
Low temps in one area doesn't prove global warming wrong, maybe you should look up how it actually works since it's obvious you have no idea.
That last article did nothing to disprove global warming. Actually none of them did. Actually, all you're doing is using ad-hominems, you're not actually disproving anything. Try again sport.
And you think opinion articles by conservatives aren't going to have any half-truths? LOL. Read actual scientific journals, do research on your own, stop just believing whatever people tell you and you feel like believing. The FACT is, there are more studies that indicate global warming is happening than there are any that indicate it's not, and in fact NONE indicate it's not happening at all just that the evidence that it's human caused is "inconclusive" which doesn't indicate that other studies that say it is are wrong. Learn how this shit works.
π: 0 β©: 1
You got off track somewhere. I've been saying all along that no one has proven jack sh*t about the global warming. Yes, you are right, anomalies do not prove anything, though such has been offered as "proof" by the AGW crowd for years!
Al Gore, the IPCC, radical environmentalists and all these AGW scientists have told us for years that: man-made global warming is a proven reality; the science proving AGW is "settled" and that certain dire consequences are a foregone conclusion.
The "facts" - not opinions - show that nothing is proven. For every proclaimed "certainty" about Anthropogenic Global Warming, there is a corresponding act of collusion (i.e.: East Anglia e-mails, documented "Inconvenient Lie" inaccuracies, etc.) or contrary evidence (i.e.: the "2007 ice study", sun effects research, etc.).
So, you have this whole thing backwards. The Scientific Method says that for a hypothesis to be accepted as valid (i.e.: "proven"), then it has to stand up to every scrutiny or test. Not most, or many or a preponderance, but all.
Hell, I'm not looking to disprove anything. On the contrary. I refuse to accept something as flimsy as Anthropogenic Global Warming, especially in light of recent revelations and a growing body climatological evidence to the contrary. Prove it to me, and I'll believe it. But in the meantime, keep your green mitts off my fu*king lifestyle, don't tax me over a "theory" and don't let the corrupt idiots at the UN have a say in how I live my life.
Period.
π: 0 β©: 0
Anthropogenic global warming is just a fraud made by IPCC, CRU and the Al Gore. Co2 released by men in not the cause. Climate changes because the Sun gets warmer..
π: 0 β©: 1
True! In fact, I'm fed up with people running down CO2, without which we could not live, nor could the plants that create oxygen! Check out this great article (the blog is good, too!) [link]
π: 0 β©: 5
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
I went back to the original post and all 5 links work perfectly. In fact, the link "algorelied.com" wasn't one I sent you. Confused by multiple screens are you? Or, it looks like you might have checked out the links I posted and this was your only retort. By the way, nice "screen shot"... moron.
Now, go sit in the corner. In fact, just go post something edgy and insightful elsewhere. Or, go draw a cartoon and color it... but use recycled paper.
I just realized that this is not even on something I posted. We're spamming up "poderiu's" page. He/she has hidden all this crap. So, it you must get in the last word, feel free. After that, e-mail me. elvis.chupacabra@gmail.com
π: 0 β©: 0
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Wrong link... moron.
π: 0 β©: 0
I figure they think we regular folks are stupid and they can fool us into anything.
Personnaly I think it is the beginning stages of the one world government Obama wants so he can be the leader. That is why he is so tight with the U.N. and why he has gone all over the world apologizing for America.
This stupid Obama-care is also another example of his trying to take over the world with breaking down America and ignore our constitution.
π: 0 β©: 0
Hell even water kills you if you drink too much
π: 0 β©: 0
Good article, thanks!
Leave you this link, is a good documentary:
[link] 
π: 0 β©: 0