HOME | DD
poderiu β US Soldiers Video Games
Published: 2010-12-05 23:49:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 888; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 49
Redirect to original
Description
...Related content
Comments: 27
why is it a crime? shit happens wrong place, wrong time
π: 0 β©: 1
They killed civilians and that is terrorism according to international law.
π: 0 β©: 1
"nigger please"... now you know international law. Let me guess you don't have a skilled job. You rely on the state to Subsidize Your Income. And you don't eat meat. LOL damn your life does suck.
π: 0 β©: 1
As usual you are mistaken. Maybe you should stop pumping FOX and valium to that square mind of yours.
π: 0 β©: 1
I SMOKE WEED... guess you're the one all jacked up on valiums and wine like some bitch with a tude;
π: 0 β©: 1
You stay allways so dumb has a stone when you smoke weed, or you are just naturaly stupid?
π: 0 β©: 1
now im stupid... tell me what do you do for a living (work)
π: 0 β©: 1
I donΒ΄t have to prove and tell anything to you about my personal life. If you want to argue about the topics, I am ok with that. But till now the only thing you show is that you have a empty brain, still full of misconceptions and prejudices.
π: 0 β©: 1
your QI is between 34 and 39?
π: 0 β©: 1
When you hang out with military targets you should expect things to get blown-up.
π: 0 β©: 1
Those civilians were not armed and they were killed. Was not any accident.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just who were the 'civilians'? I never claimed it was an 'accident'.
π: 0 β©: 1
Were innocent iraqui civilians, including journalists from Reuters.
The video is here: [link]
Also, USA didnΒ΄t have any right to invade Iraq under the alegation of lies.
π: 0 β©: 1
So what you are trying to say is that everyone 'hit' in this photo was completely innocent and there were no legitimate targets?
π: 0 β©: 1
I said that, and repeat, those were innocent civilians. Not the only innocent civilians killed. US troops killed from January 2004 to December 2009 109,032 innocent people, civilians.
I also said, and this is not an oppinion, that USA wasnΒ΄t supposed to invade Iraq. It was an ilegal military occupation.
π: 0 β©: 1
So the people in the World Trade Towers were not 'innocent civilians'? How is the fighting in Iraq 'an illegal occupation'?
π: 0 β©: 1
Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with World Trade Towers, the all world knows it, except some people like you. And you should know US government was involved in the Towers attack. US and UK, as occupying powers, shouldnΒ΄t invade and conduct the war in Iraq and when they done that they broke the Geneva Conventions.
π: 0 β©: 1
So where does it say in the Geneva Conventions that when a country violates over 70 UN resolutions that other countries can not defend themselves?
π: 0 β©: 2
So the UN should have let Saddam keep violating UN resolutions forever?!
π: 0 β©: 0
Once again, Iraq and Saddam werenΒ΄t a threat to USA. The "IraqΒ΄s Weappons of Mass Desctruction" motif alleged by US government was a lie, so US shouldnΒ΄t defend it self from a country that wasnΒ΄t a real threat. The occupation was ilegal since the begining.
π: 0 β©: 0
important stuff!
needs reformating though. 'full view' is too small to clearly read text!
Download size is too large to appreciate the whole picture.
π: 0 β©: 0