HOME | DD

Published: 2012-07-30 23:00:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 614; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
Royal By DesignFull Name Royal By Design
Nickname Queenie
Breed Calluat (credit to *TheBigBlack )
Age 12 Years
Sex Mare
Registered pending...
Mate None yet
Offspring None Yet
Parents Foundation
Height 14.3hh
Genotype EE . aa . Dd . RbRb
Potions None yet
Experience Points None yet.. will add more info when I get some
Eyes Hazel
Coat Color Grullo Rabicano
Mane Curly Dark Grey
Tail Curly Dark Grey
Personality Very intelligent. And very inquisitive. Fairly bold and outgoing. But she almost always thinks before she acts.
History ...
Horse ref from ~roar-shack-stock
Related content
Comments: 13
Nociii [2012-08-03 07:52:50 +0000 UTC]
Do you think you could add information points for potions, skill stars, and exp points? To see an example of what I mean, see some of the other references in the group.
Lovely ref, by the way. ;u;
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
violet-eve In reply to Nociii [2012-08-03 07:59:08 +0000 UTC]
Is it still allowed as it is a manipulation?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nociii In reply to violet-eve [2012-08-03 08:13:31 +0000 UTC]
I think it should be? Whether or not it counts for points (which will be determined by TBB later), it should still work as a reference. I'll ask her when she returns, to be sure. o3o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
violet-eve In reply to Nociii [2012-08-03 08:15:39 +0000 UTC]
"If I feel your photomanips are of the quality that would earn your Calluat points, I will invite you to submit your photomanips of your Calluat for art and to the group."
Oki doki :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nociii In reply to violet-eve [2012-08-03 08:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Right, and that's for points. o3o I can't say whether or not this will count for points, but it should still function as a reference.
"Its reference can be any type of image of your Calluat, it doesn't have to be fullbody, headshot, etc. Just whatever you feel like."
As I said, I'll check with TBB when she gets back tobe sure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Printed-Shadows In reply to Nociii [2012-08-03 07:58:45 +0000 UTC]
I think I should have fixed it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tickyviger135 [2012-07-31 01:06:55 +0000 UTC]
This is nice, but you should not implicate that you painted it. It looks manipulated, I can see that very clearly when I look close. It is also more like your manipulation style than your normal digital painting. The credit should be changed, it is not a "ref" of the original, it is an edit and manipulation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Printed-Shadows In reply to tickyviger135 [2012-07-31 01:18:05 +0000 UTC]
Umm. Yes I know I manipulated it. May I ask what brought you to this? Are you the stock owner? If you are then I will absolute change it. If not then you really have no reason to come through here and rant about it. The reason I say ref on these cause of the fact that I am portraying one horse, and that horse is different than the original.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tickyviger135 In reply to Printed-Shadows [2012-07-31 01:26:43 +0000 UTC]
I am not ranting. I am starting that out of respect to the owner you should credit the horse to the owner. In a manipulation you do not say "horse ref (c) blablabla", even if you have changed the appearance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0