HOME | DD

prologic77 β€” Humming Bird

Published: 2006-12-19 00:53:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 29297; Favourites: 1148; Downloads: 849
Redirect to original
Description Gonna start uploading some of my photography. Here is my first one. Let me know what you guys think. Thanks
Related content
Comments: 311

ilikeshinyobjects [2007-03-19 22:18:20 +0000 UTC]

Wow. Just...wow. Amazing shutter speed--amazing cameria--to capture the humming bird mid-flap. Bravo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LuzAngela In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:56:15 +0000 UTC]

En el patio de mi casa vienen a beber unos pequeΓ±itos, siempre estΒ΄n revoloteando,ver tu foto me maravillΓ³, es como tomarlos en la mano y apreciarlos, bella foto, buen ojo. Giselle

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alonebutloved [2007-03-19 21:51:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh wow I really like this.
Birds are one of my favorite
things to photograph.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ristar89 [2007-03-19 21:50:32 +0000 UTC]

I dunno, I say you did pretty well! ^____^ Almost impossible shot, and you captured it perfectly! Excellent job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

blackstormdragon [2007-03-19 21:44:09 +0000 UTC]

aww so cute. impressive shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to blackstormdragon [2007-03-19 21:47:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blackstormdragon In reply to prologic77 [2007-03-20 18:18:20 +0000 UTC]

welcome ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OgawaBurukku In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:41:37 +0000 UTC]

AMAZING

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lesnydemon [2007-03-19 21:38:11 +0000 UTC]

awesome shot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MikeOSoerensen [2007-03-19 21:32:59 +0000 UTC]

That is a very very good shot.. Keep going on the good work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flyingweasles109 In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:30:46 +0000 UTC]

This is absolutely fantastic. I've tried shooting Hummingbirds myself and it sure ain't easy. Congrats on the DD!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to flyingweasles109 [2007-03-19 21:44:36 +0000 UTC]

Try using a tripod. and always focus on the eye.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

flyingweasles109 In reply to prologic77 [2007-03-19 22:06:51 +0000 UTC]

All right! Thanks for the tip!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alterreality [2007-03-19 21:30:22 +0000 UTC]

man, are you f*cking serious? amazing work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to alterreality [2007-03-19 21:43:53 +0000 UTC]

yes I am f*cking serious! hahah

Thanks buddy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flyingweasles109 [2007-03-19 21:29:52 +0000 UTC]

This is absolutely fantastic. I've tried shooting Hummingbirds myself and it sure ain't easy. Congrats on the DD!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EVoLVeR-iNc In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:25:49 +0000 UTC]

really impressive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

klawatsch [2007-03-19 21:21:01 +0000 UTC]

amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kvisa-Sanaku In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:14:41 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Elvan-Lady [2007-03-19 21:12:55 +0000 UTC]

It's amazing how you managed to take a picture of one in midflight without the wings blurring!
And by the colors, I'm guessing it's a female.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

D-M-L [2007-03-19 21:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow, fantastic picture!
Looks pretty good and sharp.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ashligh In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 21:03:51 +0000 UTC]

That is...perfect.

My grandma would love it @__@

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpacyjkA [2007-03-19 21:01:25 +0000 UTC]

wow... amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LinMichu [2007-03-19 20:53:12 +0000 UTC]

wow .. nice shot ..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

macer18 [2007-03-19 20:44:59 +0000 UTC]

i love it!!! kudos to you. its a great picture and very clear, cnsidering hummingbirds' wings beat at abt 10-15 times a second. and u were able to get a very nice still shot. good for you. what speed did u take it at?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to macer18 [2007-03-19 21:13:06 +0000 UTC]

I think it was at around 2000 with ISO of 400. Don't remember.

Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mmsanett [2007-03-19 20:41:10 +0000 UTC]

WOW, that's amazing. Go you! Beautiful shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mmsanett [2007-03-19 20:41:07 +0000 UTC]

WOW, that's amazing. Go you! Beautiful shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gools162 [2007-03-19 20:34:34 +0000 UTC]

really beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GreasyPirate [2007-03-19 19:28:13 +0000 UTC]

Wow! Great shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flyeye [2007-03-19 19:27:44 +0000 UTC]

Perfect in all resects. Be proud.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dixyxib [2007-03-19 19:27:41 +0000 UTC]

geez. awesome!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

A-c-h-m-e-d [2007-03-19 19:25:19 +0000 UTC]

wow.very good shot !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SaylaMarz [2007-03-19 19:18:01 +0000 UTC]

lovely. out of curiosity, what lens are you using?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to SaylaMarz [2007-03-19 21:15:02 +0000 UTC]

I have used a very cheap Canon 75-300 USM lens. I bought it for $100 on ebay. I made this photo look good in photoshop.

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SaylaMarz In reply to prologic77 [2007-03-19 21:38:13 +0000 UTC]

Sounds liek a good dea - I'm kind of scared to buy used equipment so anonymously - I'm buying a Tamron 24-75 f/2.8 from a friend. That's probably the only way I'll trust a seller..

Is the background blur photoshop, or a product of the focal length?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fusinfun In reply to SaylaMarz [2007-03-20 02:05:40 +0000 UTC]

Unless i am much mistaken, the blur is the result of the large (f5) aperture, and the large separation of the bird from the background bush/tree. (might have been extra blurred in photoshop)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SaylaMarz In reply to fusinfun [2007-03-20 14:56:47 +0000 UTC]

lol f/5 sounds like a small aperture to me....I try to work around f/1.8 or 2.8

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fusinfun In reply to SaylaMarz [2007-03-21 01:02:26 +0000 UTC]

well, some of us can't spend a lot of money on camera lenses... and 5 is pretty large on a scale that goes to 32, especially at 200m focal length. (actually larger than the max on my 55mm)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

SaylaMarz In reply to fusinfun [2007-03-21 16:00:51 +0000 UTC]

oh yea - in the zoom range the DOF is really nice still - my issue is that I do a lot of indoor work and portraits, so I need the light sensitivity and the shorter focal length with the short DOF.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fusinfun In reply to SaylaMarz [2007-03-22 01:20:15 +0000 UTC]

yeah, indoor does take different specs. (nature and outdoor sports FTW!)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fusinfun In reply to fusinfun [2007-03-21 01:04:04 +0000 UTC]

correction! 200 mm focal length

also, i didn't want to sound bitter/bitchy, but thats how it looks to me now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gravity1046 [2007-03-19 19:09:23 +0000 UTC]

wow. that is such a hard animal to capture flawlessly, but it seems you did! (:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prologic77 In reply to gravity1046 [2007-03-19 21:15:55 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gravity1046 In reply to prologic77 [2007-03-19 22:12:58 +0000 UTC]

-hugs- no prob, you so deserve it. :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tomer-DA [2007-03-19 19:08:26 +0000 UTC]

nice photo, i know its hard to get a sharp photo of this bird. good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Man-i In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 19:05:18 +0000 UTC]

very nice shoot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

digitalamit In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 18:53:44 +0000 UTC]

Awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

foppa In reply to ??? [2007-03-19 18:43:10 +0000 UTC]

Oh J-sus F-cking C-rist!
Amazon photograph really!
One cold only dream about ever doing something like this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MolotovRuss [2007-03-19 18:39:41 +0000 UTC]

Wowwie!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>