HOME | DD

Published: 2010-06-24 00:39:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 89423; Favourites: 2673; Downloads: 1142
Redirect to original
Description
i have had alot of people in the past either ask me how to draw raptors, or when will i make another tutorial. so here is a tutorial on raptors. grrrr. i hope its understandable and stuff.This will prolly be edited a few times, i plan to add a new section every now and then. i am open for critique from those who perhaps have had even more experience with dromaeosaurids.
i am always available for redlining.
EDIT LIST:
6/24/10
-added in the halluxes to avoid confusion
-edited a minor wing feather error pointed out by ixerin
Related content
Comments: 268
SqueerSquid [2022-07-12 06:09:42 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
M-SEIJIN [2022-06-28 16:10:24 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 2
Beforenightfallfalls In reply to M-SEIJIN [2023-01-27 13:49:31 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
CakeAlly [2021-01-08 01:33:01 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
MyFantasiMind [2020-08-09 16:08:35 +0000 UTC]
π: 3 β©: 0
Rhynca-Rook In reply to 0Luna123 [2018-05-25 21:57:11 +0000 UTC]
But why are they so long there?
π: 0 β©: 2
Patchi1995 In reply to Rhynca-Rook [2018-06-23 16:38:25 +0000 UTC]
It's kinda like a feathery mane.
π: 0 β©: 0
0Luna123 In reply to Rhynca-Rook [2018-05-26 12:42:27 +0000 UTC]
I can't find an answer to this
π: 0 β©: 0
dogzer [2017-09-21 19:51:37 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, 2010. I'm assuming either example is equally outdated by now. So might as well draw the Jurassic Park velociraptor (aka the version that looks cool)
π: 0 β©: 2
PsyrapMafia In reply to dogzer [2018-12-14 02:41:53 +0000 UTC]
about as cool as a hairless bear
π: 7 β©: 0
TheHarpyEagle In reply to dogzer [2017-11-12 22:19:40 +0000 UTC]
You mean the version that looks like an autistic lizard? And no, the "correct" version is still quite close to the accepted truth.
π: 5 β©: 1
AimeePenguins In reply to TheHarpyEagle [2019-11-08 11:19:24 +0000 UTC]
just because something looks weird, doesn't mean you should call it "autistic".
π: 2 β©: 1
TheHarpyEagle In reply to AimeePenguins [2019-11-08 18:35:43 +0000 UTC]
π: 2 β©: 0
Kelmfire [2016-06-03 20:59:51 +0000 UTC]
I just wanted you to know that this tutorial has helped me for years. Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wolfhooligans [2016-05-25 20:08:40 +0000 UTC]
And for the one who want to draw a raptor of jurassic park?
π: 0 β©: 2
ReddyRAD In reply to Wolfhooligans [2021-05-26 08:06:22 +0000 UTC]
π: 2 β©: 0
Spinosaurus14 In reply to Wolfhooligans [2016-11-02 00:13:15 +0000 UTC]
Well, then you are not drawing a dinosaur..
π: 2 β©: 1
Wolfhooligans In reply to Spinosaurus14 [2016-11-02 01:02:59 +0000 UTC]
Will rather tell to impose his law, because if I remember myself well the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park was like that that have to consider them
π: 0 β©: 0
Dalek-who [2016-04-14 16:14:15 +0000 UTC]
YourΒ tutorial's image helped with meΒ making this forΒ differentΒ raptorΒ variants:
Raptor-Base
π: 0 β©: 1
FeatherNerd In reply to Dalek-who [2016-12-29 18:34:56 +0000 UTC]
You forgot the feathers
π: 0 β©: 0
FloofyDinoLover [2016-03-03 11:09:41 +0000 UTC]
This tutorial really helped me make raptors! Hopefully I will learn to be better at making the feet and fingers though.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thunderstudent [2016-02-27 04:31:25 +0000 UTC]
Artistically I like incorrect raptor design from the 90's best, although I know both as a dinosaur buff and a paleontological student it's incorrect.
π: 0 β©: 0
PsyrapMafia In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-09-15 23:08:43 +0000 UTC]
all scientific research thus far has led up to yes they do.Β
π: 3 β©: 1
CaptainGlitch In reply to PsyrapMafia [2016-09-15 23:39:57 +0000 UTC]
This is very old. The matter is cleared up.
π: 0 β©: 2
FeatherNerd In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-12-29 18:37:31 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
PsyrapMafia In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-09-16 00:43:48 +0000 UTC]
sorry about that. glad to hear. (I've been away awhile)
π: 0 β©: 0
randomdinos In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-01-07 13:38:23 +0000 UTC]
That's not how feathers work...
π: 0 β©: 1
randomdinos In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-01-07 14:17:39 +0000 UTC]
The idea that some raptors could have feathers and others not. Dromaeosauridae isn't wide enough to make that much variation possible. You could say not all dinosaurs had feathers, or not all theropods had feathers, but raptors did all have them.
π: 1 β©: 2
Arthas972 In reply to randomdinos [2016-02-13 04:38:32 +0000 UTC]
I thought most raptors had those shaft things instead of actual feathers?
π: 0 β©: 1
Corallianassa In reply to Arthas972 [2016-12-19 20:38:26 +0000 UTC]
All raptor fossils with feather imprints show they had very advanced feathers, similar in layout to this:
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipediaβ¦
Or:
images.mentalfloss.com/sites/dβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
CaptainGlitch In reply to randomdinos [2016-01-07 14:37:36 +0000 UTC]
my belief is that how the hell do we actually know raptors had feathers? just because their bone structure shows that they MIGHT have feathers doesn't mean they definitely do.
π: 0 β©: 2
TYRANTKINGS In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-01-12 23:45:16 +0000 UTC]
this is something that catches people a lot tbh but honestly the explanation is really simple!
we have fossil evidence of raptors very closely related to other raptors with feather impressions. a good example is archaeoptrix , as well as microraptor . both of these dinosaurs not only had feathers, but they were extremely advanced and well-developed feathers designed to enable flight. that is millions of years of evolution just to hit a feather structure that is slightly more complicated than down, let alone fully asymmetrical feathers on a quill! because of this, one can assume that any animal that turned up after them that was related to them would absolutely have feathers, because evolution doesn't just pick up something like that and go 'nah, nevermind'. Not when its a full body covering that advanced!Β
not only that, but velociraptor as well as dakotaraptor (a newly-described raptor just a bit smaller than utahraptor that was went extinct during the K-T extinction event and lived in the same time and habitat as tyrannosaurus rex) both have distinct bumps in the bones of their forearms that are known from modern bird bones to be quill-nubs. this means that not only did these animals have feathers, but they were so developed as to be true flight feathers that rooted themselves in the animal's bones!
most theropods have also been described as feathered at this point, too, because we've found many basal(/primitive) species with feather impressions! t. rex itself would have had some amount of feather covering simply because all its ancestors did (distinctly proven by the closely related yutyrannus), though it would have been some light downy fluff
basically you'd need a really really hardcore mutation for an animal to suddenly lose its feathers, and since birds today ALL have feathers, we can assume feathers were really incredibly important for some reason. since its suspected they were for thermoregulation, it's incredibly unlikely any animal without feathers would have survived long enough to pass on its weird mutation to other generations.
tl;dr theropods had feathers, dude.Β
π: 3 β©: 0
randomdinos In reply to CaptainGlitch [2016-01-07 16:34:45 +0000 UTC]
Your belief makes sense, but it could also be used to justify that dinosaurs didn't have any eyes, or that they never lived in the first place. I mean we don't see T.rex walking around today, so how do we know that it was ever a living animal and the fossils aren't just rocks with a weird shape? The same way we know that raptors had feathers, by looking at the bones and similarities to modern animals.
π: 1 β©: 0
FiliusTonitrui [2015-10-27 02:34:15 +0000 UTC]
There are skull recunstructions that show the skull more like the iriginal revonstruction, but with an longer snout, being more raptor like.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>