HOME | DD

Published: 2004-12-22 01:43:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 2456; Favourites: 34; Downloads: 1130
Redirect to original
Description
This is one photo I am very proud of. I have never pushed my abilities as far before, everything was stretched to it's limits for this photo.This photo was taken in macro mode on my camera at the minimum focal length. It was taken on the inch-wide gap above my F4 and F5 keys on my computer's keyboard - that gives you an idea of the size of the fobwatch. I had trouble finding a bright enough light source that had an even emission area. I ended up using my cold cathode tube from my computer as a light source, held around 3 inches away from the fobwatch. The thing is, my cold cathode tube emits a bright GREEN light, not white or yellow. What's more, my keyboard is currently painted a bright metallic silver - once again not white. And at such a short distance taking a clear photo proved nearly impossible. I took over 60 shots of this fobwatch to get everything just right.
I normally do very little post-processing - just a run through Neat Image, add the border, resize and unsharp mask. Occasionally I'll slightly adjust the contrast, edit the curves slightly or do some other small fiddling but nothing strikingly different. This is the first time I have ever altered the colours of an image so drastically - it was originally all a VERY bright green, washed out, distorted and blurry. I think it was all worth it though, I'm very happy with how it turned out. You'd never know it was lit by a green light and it's sitting on a silver surface
For those curious enough, yes, it's an original Swiss fobwatch. My Mum bought an old chest of drawers that was over 125 years old and we found this hidden in a secret compartment inside it. We don't know exactly when it was put in there and forgotten about it, but it is obviously old and would have been valuable if it was intact and working. When I found it it was one solid chunk of grease and dirt - I did my best to remove most of the dirt with a knife blade and tweezers but I couldn't remove the stains on the metal.
EDIT: I uploaded the original photo, unedited into my scraps section. You can view it here so you can compare the actual original photo with this version. I still wouldn't call this a photomanipulation though, it's not drastic enough in my books.
Related content
Comments: 39
Squidje96 [2011-01-22 14:46:10 +0000 UTC]
It's reminiscent of the one from Doctor Who *nerds out slightly*, lovely photo though, and the slight manip (if that) just heightens the detail and makes it look like a really professional photo ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
runofthemill [2007-05-30 15:02:49 +0000 UTC]
This would've been a very nice pocketwatch. You see, the screws on the balance adjust the inertia, and the index regulator (lever by the F/S and A/R) adjusts the effective length of the spring. This is also used in finest watches today. It's missing a couple of obvious pieces (mainspring assembly and pawl) but can be restored if one was so inclined.
I like the way you lit the scene, lighting is difficult in extreme macro shorts. Way to improvise, with the green cold cathode, I mean.
Cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to runofthemill [2007-06-01 13:41:20 +0000 UTC]
I tried to restore it, but after bathing it in various chemicals to remove the rust and dirt, the end result was something that was so brittle there wasn't much I could do with it. When I tried to take it apart further, three of the screws disintegrated. The rest of it was in such a bad condition, I don't think it was possible to restore it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Firretayl [2005-08-09 06:46:34 +0000 UTC]
This one is great. The editing I wouldn't call photomanipulation. But it sure looks better then the normal photo. Nice work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sakhmet [2005-06-12 15:21:03 +0000 UTC]
Interesting detail there into what it took to get this photo right -- I found it quite interesting as its not something most photographers do. The watch is fantastic, imagine finding it hidden in a secret compartment in a chest? I thought only people in books had that kind of thing happen to them. Great photo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to sakhmet [2005-06-12 15:58:58 +0000 UTC]
Which do you mean, most photographers don't put that much effort into a photo, or most don't put that much effort into the photo commentary? I like to try and fill the commentary box with as much info as I can. I hate it when people just put two words and nothing else.. If I'm going to read what the artist thinks about their work, I want to actually read what they think about it, not to be surprised by a mostly empty space
But yeah, it was fun... I used to have things like that happen all the time though, thanks to my great grandfather being a highly intelligent, eccentric packrat. I didn't like visiting my other grandparents much as a child, but visiting him was always an eventure... I could go exploring through his house and I literally never knew what I would find, he had so many weird, odd and interesting things. I've got a tiny little complicated device with levers, springs and gears all over it... its sole purpose is that when you put a pencil in it and draw a line, it makes the pencil go up-and-down to make a dotted line. In his older years he couldn't walk much, but his mind was still as active as ever, so he spent a lot of time constructing things... he constructed the most amazing geometric shapes, and later on we found out that he actually had built the first known copy of some, making him the discoverer/inventor of those shapes... but he made them out of cardboard cereal boxes, paperclips, junk mail and splinters of old wood. So, sitting in some museums are some rather amazing and intricate geometric shapes, credited to his name as the first creator of those shapes, made entirely out of household junk. I pulled open a draw one day and discovered his collection labelled "Pieces of string too small to use". The title was apt. I found a huge telescope one time in a pile on his verandah. Around 20-metres long, home-constructed out of some pipes and pieces of wood. He was a funny old guy... I've got quite a few stories about him, but this post is getting a bit long, so I'd best stop my rambling now o.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
m883 [2005-03-21 10:06:43 +0000 UTC]
for me- You've found a SOUL in this watch
admire it
ps. thx for comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to m883 [2005-03-21 10:23:29 +0000 UTC]
No problem, I try to comment on other people's works as much as I can.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tear-stained-cheeks [2005-01-27 07:50:48 +0000 UTC]
i really love how you put both shots of it up so we can compare. even though the one in the green light looks psychadelic, this one has that old fashioned appeal. you did a great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to tear-stained-cheeks [2005-01-27 09:53:29 +0000 UTC]
Thanks... sometimes I put a lot more effort into these photos than people think I do
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
listens-to-the-stars [2005-01-19 00:01:18 +0000 UTC]
The things artists do to get their ideas to work. It payed off. Beautiful! I love that I had no idea how small it actually was. It seems so big! Beautiful depth of field with it, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to listens-to-the-stars [2005-01-19 06:30:38 +0000 UTC]
Thanks... I"m glad it showed off; I put so much work into it that I'd be glad if it didn't show off
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tm-gemini [2005-01-07 22:48:50 +0000 UTC]
I think modification vs adjustment is the line where manipulation lies. There is a difference between what you are doing here, and changing the original photograph to be something else entirely. Great job. Is this the hue of the actual watch, itself?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to tm-gemini [2005-01-08 06:25:28 +0000 UTC]
It's close to, but not exactly... this is a much more romantic golden brown, the real brown is dirtier, darker and more metallic-grayish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
khaospixie [2005-01-05 10:13:15 +0000 UTC]
wow this pic is awesome! considering all the difficulties you had to go through getting it, its really amazing!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to khaospixie [2005-01-05 11:10:51 +0000 UTC]
hehe, yeah... I'm surprised with how well it turned out myself, the original photograph doesn't look like anything special as you can see from it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hollowlight [2004-12-29 23:39:31 +0000 UTC]
that is beautiful, very simplistic and interesting. the only thing bothering me is the right front of the subject being slightly out of focus, because it sort of disrupts the balance of the picture and takes your eye off that wonderful gear sticking out. it's difficult to get such a small subject entirely in focus, though. great choice of coloring.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to hollowlight [2004-12-30 00:25:14 +0000 UTC]
I don't think there's much I can do about that in postprocessing, but I'll look into it... The focal distance was very short (the far back of the timepiece is out of focus if you look carefully), and I didn't want to shrink the aperture size on my camera if I could help it - I had enough trouble holding the camera still that increasing the shutter time and shrinking the aperture would do more harm than good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oscelot [2004-12-28 15:12:16 +0000 UTC]
wow, that's gorgeous.. it's so brassy and beautiful..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to Oscelot [2004-12-28 15:21:12 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I tried to make it look that way... it currently looks a nice rusted bronze. Originally it was probably a nice polished bronze
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JohnSurridge [2004-12-23 12:29:02 +0000 UTC]
wow! your justified in being very proud of this. Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
martsen79 [2004-12-23 03:35:08 +0000 UTC]
Excellent. I love timepieces, and you've shown the mechanical aspect of it very well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fahrmboy [2004-12-23 01:50:40 +0000 UTC]
The work you put forth in this was dedicated, and it shows. And it really is timeless.
Excellent job lighting your still shots lately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hayaji [2004-12-22 03:07:06 +0000 UTC]
That is extremely impressive. Also an incredible job of cleaning that tiny thing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to hayaji [2004-12-22 03:18:56 +0000 UTC]
Thanks; cleaning was done with some sewing machine oil, a knife blade and a pin that I had sharpened down to a very fine point. Those teeth on the gears are tiny and took forever to clean!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kerahna [2004-12-22 02:35:01 +0000 UTC]
wow, that is an amazing shot. the contrast and sharpness is perfect, and so is the color scheme. (story behind it is neat too )maybe you could upload the original photo somewhere to show how much work you've done?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to Kerahna [2004-12-22 03:30:13 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, not a bad idea at all... I put the original photo in my scraps section; You can view it here .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kerahna In reply to riumplus [2004-12-22 04:04:00 +0000 UTC]
wow..that makes me respect this piece so much more ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to Kerahna [2004-12-22 04:08:18 +0000 UTC]
Hehe, thanks... glad you like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mindmosaic [2004-12-22 01:47:16 +0000 UTC]
Nice job.
The clarity in the final result is amazing - nice colours too!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to mindmosaic [2004-12-22 01:54:29 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I spent a while getting the image just how I like it, I'm glad it paid off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
XthexendX [2004-12-22 01:46:56 +0000 UTC]
....that clock has no face!
it looks like you put quite alot of work into this deviation, and i believe it has paid off.
awesome deviation.
- XthexendX
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to XthexendX [2004-12-22 01:52:59 +0000 UTC]
There was no face with it when I found it in the chest of drawers, but that made it look even better in my opinion. The circle in the centre would have been connected either the second or the minute hand and the lone gear/empty gear on the right would have been for the minute or the hour hand hand. I'm unsure if this watch would've had a second hand or not, though.
I think it looks neat with all the gears visible though
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RobertsRose [2004-12-22 01:45:09 +0000 UTC]
cool perception, and good job sharpening up the detail
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
riumplus In reply to RobertsRose [2004-12-22 01:46:52 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I'm glad you like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0