HOME | DD

Published: 2015-12-14 19:06:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 2770; Favourites: 42; Downloads: 21
Redirect to original
Description
The Federation's Progress-class destroyer is a smaller vessel designed primarily for supporting and defending larger capital ships from short-range attackers. With relatively light armor, a weak warp drive, and no contingent of soldiers for planetary assault, the Progress-class is not intended to operate separately from a fleet. However, its powerful sublight engines and inertial dampeners give it excellent maneuverability within realspace, allowing it to intercept attacking drones and cruisers with relative ease. The Progress-class is one of the most numerous ships in the Federal Star Fleet, and practically no fleets are seen without one.The primary armament of the Progress-class is its photon torpedoes. Each vessel is stocked with several thousand photon torpedoes. While this seems to be an excessive number, the difficulty of magnetically guiding a photon charge at the distances of most orbital engagements means that most torpedoes will miss their targets, particularly if they are small, quick drones. Larger vessels, particularly Imperial cruisers, have shields heavy enough to withstand a barrage of thousands of photon torpedoes, while a Progress-class destroyer would shields crumple when faced with said cruiser's turbolaser batteries. Therefore, Progress-class destroyers are intended to hunt drones and smaller vessels, and to flee from ships of equal or greater size and firepower. The ship's two sublight engines, and various maneuvering thrusters, are well-equipped for this hit-and-run style of warfare. Furthermore, Progress-class destroyers are intended to operate with other destroyers and larger vessels, forming combined arms attack groups that can face off against stronger opponents.
Further augmenting the Progress-class destroyer's capabilities are its phasers. The Progress-class' heavy phasers are fairly low-powered for a ship of its size, and the ship only has them mounted on its nose. However, the destroyer's true firepower comes in the form of its dorsal superphaser. Based on reverse-engineered Imperial technology, the superphaser is powerful enough to destroy most Imperial vessels outright and severely damage even a fully-shielded Imperial battlestar. However, the superphaser requires almost all of the energy the destroyer's reactor can muster, leaving the ship vulnerable to attack. The superphaser's effective range also leaves something to be desired, as the entire ship must turn to aim the weapon, and then the engines must be deactivated in order to fire the weapon. This often gives an opponent time to maneuver away, if he is aware he is being targeted. This makes distractions and maneuvers that box the enemy in necessary. For this reason, most superphasers are instead used for glassing worlds.
Related content
Comments: 30
Legionaire1776 [2017-09-19 17:39:38 +0000 UTC]
I find it ironic that a destroyer class is named "Progress".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PersephoneEosopoulou [2016-09-20 02:10:52 +0000 UTC]
Fittingly Star Trekish which makes sense given the Feds are loosely a deconstruction of the Federation right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hgfggg [2016-05-25 23:23:44 +0000 UTC]
So the side of this vessel reads: Shlov (fleet), Ab(d/f)alakb(j/y)z (ship, maybe). Also, why does the name there use what looks more like Middle Standard Imperial? I hope more ships will have names on them, hopefully the Enterprise-class will.
Also, P.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to hgfggg [2016-05-25 23:30:50 +0000 UTC]
Abdalakbyz means "United Galactic Federation." SSI and MSI share a lot of the same characters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hgfggg In reply to RvBOMally [2016-05-25 23:33:36 +0000 UTC]
Good to know that "Ab" happens to be a nice prefix. Abzhuyuz, Abdalakbyz...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hgfggg In reply to RvBOMally [2016-05-25 23:51:30 +0000 UTC]
Maybe because the translators didn't know what Soyuz meant somehow, they just made it "United (or federated, for that matter) Soyuz"? Probably they use a different word structure there, though. Dalakbyz's a good word for galactic if I'm right, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to hgfggg [2016-05-26 00:03:16 +0000 UTC]
Ab means federation. Dalakbyz means galactic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
hgfggg In reply to RvBOMally [2016-05-26 00:13:16 +0000 UTC]
So if they knew a little more about the (our?) US, it could be something related to "Abmyrhk"? Actually, because it notes "Empire of Myrhk", is it more often referred to as something like "Kwamyrhk"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hgfggg In reply to RvBOMally [2016-05-26 00:05:36 +0000 UTC]
Nice. Have federations really become so common over history that their system's name has been reduced to "Ab"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-12-20 16:23:52 +0000 UTC]
I've been meaning to ask ... how does a "photon torpedo" work?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-12-20 18:44:58 +0000 UTC]
It's an antimatter charge that detonates and creates an extremely energetic, directed photon burst on contact with a target.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-12-20 19:34:48 +0000 UTC]
Shouldn't they be called "antimatter torpedos", then? I mean, a nuke releases plenty of photons, too, but we don't call it a "photon bomb".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-12-20 19:44:34 +0000 UTC]
Photon torpedo sounds cooler. And there are many sorts of antimatter weapons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-12-20 19:52:32 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, sure, "antimatter torpedo" is probably too vague a term, but photons? Seriously? That's a hundred times as vague! I can't think of a single type of explosion that doesn't involve photons! Hell, we don't even know what kind of EM radiation we are dealing with here, they're not even called "gamma ray torpedos" or something like that. It's like McDonalds releasing a Food Burger, or driving a Vehicle Car.
I know you're just using the term because Star Trek used it, so consider my rant directed at that franchise and not you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-12-20 20:28:02 +0000 UTC]
The mechanism does specifically involve the use of photons as the destructive agent. The antimatter is merely fuel. Antimatter torpedo implies that the raw, destructive power of the antimatter is being used, with no other process in between.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-12-23 15:42:30 +0000 UTC]
So ... the destructive agent is kind of like a laser, except a directed explosion instead of a beam?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-12-23 15:52:50 +0000 UTC]
The directed explosion creates a beam. The concept is similar to this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-12-23 16:15:54 +0000 UTC]
That's ... that's so damn awesome. My life is now richer.
Edit: I love how it's sometimes difficult to tell the difference between real science and something drawn by an overexcited 12-year-old .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hgfggg [2015-12-19 18:54:30 +0000 UTC]
Well, that's absolutely a mix of old and new. Intrepid-y Constitution, with the side of being ridiculously huge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to hgfggg [2015-12-21 00:18:57 +0000 UTC]
It's stylistically designed to be that way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mechazoidfallen [2015-12-15 05:56:28 +0000 UTC]
How practical is this design compared to other space cadets space craft. The superphaser seems like it could cause some major problems for the craft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Mechazoidfallen [2015-12-15 06:03:10 +0000 UTC]
It works, if that's what you're asking. What problems do you foresee with the superphaser?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mechazoidfallen In reply to RvBOMally [2015-12-15 06:31:13 +0000 UTC]
Well the ship has to turn completely to fire, it can fire only at close range, and its shields are down once it fires as you put before. But I kind of like it because it shows the flaws with the with the federation. By the way does the federation have a aliens similar to the Vulcan.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Mechazoidfallen [2015-12-15 06:55:48 +0000 UTC]
It doesn't have to fire at close range. It can snipe at targets many hundreds of kilometers away.
As for aliens similar to Vulcans? No. Human variants? Possibly, I haven't decided.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0