HOME | DD
Samize β Flying Knight
Published: 2011-10-03 19:17:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 5991; Favourites: 130; Downloads: 77
Redirect to original
Description
This is for an expansion of the Necrorun flash/mobile game.The original flash game can be played here:
[link]
(or in many other online flash game sites, just look it up if youΒ΄re interested)
It is also available for mobile phones.
Anyway, the upcoming expansion practically doubles the amount of game content. It is being really cool making the graphics for it.
Related content
Comments: 17
I like it, but the dark tones on a dark background don't exactly make it easy to read. why not a more complimentary background?
π: 0 β©: 1
You're right. It's the background in which he appears in the game, a cave. I should have planned this better, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
a generally good idea for such cases is to work with a lil of a secondary lightsource and have some of the highlights "pop" by increasing contrast by a fair amount. I really like the fluid animation though.
π: 0 β©: 0
Goddamn. I was careless enough to go near these knights. :'D Even the block doesn't help. XD;;;;
Guess taking distance when it swings its sword should be recommended.
π: 0 β©: 0
Pretty good--reminds me of Shining Force for some reason.
π: 0 β©: 0
Gah! So good! Look at the animation! And the texturing. Many props. Could you explain what this Necrorun game is? Any link i can follow?
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you! Certainly, I explained it a little better in the description.
π: 0 β©: 1
Shouldn't he go down a little when he tries to make a heavy swing? His wings stops flapping after all.
π: 0 β©: 1
I agree. But it wouldnΒ΄t work well in-game. Also, those tiny and slow wings shouldnΒ΄t really make an armored person fly. ItΒ΄s a game.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hm? I wasn't refering to that. I was pointing out that when he prepares for the blow he goes down slightly,
then he recovers, flies up again after his attack. I think he would look less.. robotic, if he did that. ;S
π: 0 β©: 1
That is what wasn't working well in-game. I was just explaining why I did it this way, even though I agree with you.
π: 0 β©: 1
