HOME | DD

ScotNick β€” Guess what this is? by-nc-nd

Published: 2016-10-05 18:11:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 1215; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description So I shot this pic back in March, but didn't think about uploading it. Why? Well I actually have no idea
I didn't change anything on the model so I thought you guys might like to see it, it's not done at all, the tender is still missing parts, and I'm missing some wheels (the large driving wheels on the other side are still missing )
Related content
Comments: 24

zanetwinsfromsodor [2020-11-15 16:55:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Garidelle1 [2016-10-28 04:48:16 +0000 UTC]

Do you have instructions for this locomotive?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Garidelle1 [2017-01-29 22:11:34 +0000 UTC]

Sadly not :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Harry-Topper [2016-10-08 17:22:33 +0000 UTC]

An Atlantic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Harry-Topper [2016-10-11 18:33:53 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harry-Topper In reply to ScotNick [2016-10-11 18:55:54 +0000 UTC]

LBSCR Beachy Head
GNR No. 990

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Harry-Topper [2016-10-31 22:28:23 +0000 UTC]

You're quite close, but not 100% correct - I try to model it afterΒ GNR No. 251, which is an improvement of GNR No. 990 (the most important visual difference is the bigger boiler).
Also notice when looking at LBSCR Bleachy Head you'll see that the cylinders are under the running plate, whereas my model and the GNR No. 251 have the cylinders interfering with the running plate.
But good guess

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harry-Topper In reply to ScotNick [2016-10-31 22:35:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NetGreen123 [2016-10-06 15:50:25 +0000 UTC]

ITS SO CUTE!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to NetGreen123 [2016-10-06 16:39:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shortround551 [2016-10-05 19:58:12 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful Curves!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Shortround551 [2016-10-05 21:03:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rockyrailroad578 [2016-10-05 19:39:42 +0000 UTC]

The 'large boiler' C1! Lovely, I really like the curves on the build here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2016-10-05 21:10:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
Don't know if you realized it, but the actual challenge were the drivers - they have no flange.
The advantages:Β 
- drivers can be placed closer together, like on the real thing
- the connection rods don't interfere with the leading wheels in curves
- the splashers and running plate can sit lower (as flanges need some free space upwards as well)
- the engine doesn't have much overhang in curves, but the driving wheels still never leave the rails and just slide a little bit to the side on the rail

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockyrailroad578 In reply to ScotNick [2016-10-06 14:21:42 +0000 UTC]

Ah! Interesting technique! I did something similar a while back when I made a little red 4-4-2, where only the front driver had flanges, and the trailing axle was rigid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mitchika2 [2016-10-05 19:07:29 +0000 UTC]

its awesome ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to mitchika2 [2016-10-05 21:10:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

waltsland [2016-10-05 18:43:06 +0000 UTC]

it's a C1 and at the same time Henry as he was design by Awdry originally, Awsome job dude

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to waltsland [2016-10-05 21:12:14 +0000 UTC]

Oh, for a long time I didn't know Henry was supposed to be a C1, I just loove these engines! They do look a little bit like a compressed Flying Scotsman
Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

waltsland In reply to ScotNick [2016-10-06 09:55:03 +0000 UTC]

inded they look, i prefer the tankies like the E2, J50, Jinty and the Hudswell Clark

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to waltsland [2016-10-06 16:38:45 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I|m more for tender engines, I like the sleek look they often have, especially the British ones

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

waltsland In reply to ScotNick [2016-10-07 09:12:21 +0000 UTC]

inded, do you any favourite US engine?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Curtis-Parish [2016-10-05 18:21:02 +0000 UTC]

That's a GNR C1 Atlantic 4-4-2.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScotNick In reply to Curtis-Parish [2016-10-05 21:12:23 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, it is

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0