HOME | DD

SideVVays — Flora

Published: 2009-04-03 17:23:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 732; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "Earth laughs in flowers..."




============================
reversed 18-55 @ 35mm


Featured:
[link] =pepytta 's journal
[link] =Darksolitude 's journal
[link] *QuiZ04291993 's journal
[link] *And-I-Walk-Alone 's journal
Related content
Comments: 44

pullingcandy [2009-06-15 06:35:26 +0000 UTC]

Your critique function isn't on for this, but I am popping in on behalf of *CritiqueWeek , so I'll give this a run down anyway in comment form (I just hope I get to 100 words, I always seem to fall short when it's in comment form).

First off, I adore rule of thirds, or close to rule of thirds, flower photography. You've an interesting piece of subject matter here as well, it's not your conventional pansy or tulip..or maybe it is, because I don't know my flowers very well, but it doesn't look like either to me (It's also not a rose!)

The stark, muted and earthy background really lends this some grace. It brings out the delicious coloring in the flower, and how there is no distractions is what really sets off the little hairs on the petals and stem. A nice treat for the eyes, for sure! It was captured wonderfully, it reminds me of dusk, which is one of my favorite times of day, especially to see flowers, which always smell so wonderful as the outdoors are cooling off for the night.

Only thing I could think to suggest is to clear up the minute amount of noise in the plain background. It's barely noticeable, but I'd hate to go off without critiquing some part of the picture, the rest is so nicely done.

Other then that, you've got quite a unique flower portrait here, one that I would certainly be proud of if I had taken it myself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to pullingcandy [2009-06-15 08:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Wow! I don't really know what to say. Thank you!
Well, I don't have the critique function enebled on anything, cause I don't have a subscription. But thank you again for doing this!

And you loved it! Love you!

About the noise, trust me it had more (iso 1600), so what you see here is the result of some heavy noise reduction. I guess a bit of blur on the noisy parts could solve the problem, so a revisit is in order. Will do when some free time comes up.(currently going through the final highschool exams thingie)

And I don't know what kind of flower is either, but what I can tell you is that it's quite tiny (1cm or so).


Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pullingcandy In reply to SideVVays [2009-06-15 13:41:02 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! And oh - it says you're an official beta tester, so...until just now my knowledge was that beta testers have subscriptions My bad! I didn't know or I wouldn't have used up words with that disclaimer!
Oh, that's very tiny. You've done even better for it being so small The noise is just a minor detail that yes, blur could fix - I thought I said that, because it's my favorite piece of advice to hand out hehe, but it WAS 2am when I critiqued. Either way, I really enjoyed this and thank you for responding! That makes my morning <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to pullingcandy [2009-06-15 18:21:31 +0000 UTC]

Yes, beta testers don't need to have a subscription to be ...beta testers! Once a beta, always a beta!
(don't worry, I didn't know either, and was a total wtf moment when my subscription expired and the symbol next to my name didn't change. )

The size of the flower made everything more difficult, cause, as ai don't have a macro lens, I had to use my 18-55 kit lens reversed, to fill the frame with the tiny flower. The shallow dof was the hardest part, and I had to do about 50 shots to get this one, which was the only good one.
The noise didn't bother me as much at first, and after the noise reduction, it didn't bother me at all, but now, that you mentioned it, it does look a bit "grainy". But, as I said, when I'll find some free time, I'll take care of it!

It was my pleasure responding. And your critique deffinetely made my day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pullingcandy In reply to SideVVays [2009-06-16 02:09:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh the noise wasn't a problem really! Don't put yourself out just because I had to struggle to find something to point out that could be considered a flaw in any way, I just hate not having something to say, because most people think that a critique has to have at least one thing that's 'wrong' with the image. And I couldn't find anything else

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to pullingcandy [2009-06-16 21:13:51 +0000 UTC]

It's ok. I kinda feel the same way, and often find myself pointing only the good things in photos.
Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuiZ04291993 [2009-04-13 07:45:06 +0000 UTC]

featured here : [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to QuiZ04291993 [2009-04-14 11:02:32 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sadik18 [2009-04-07 18:32:22 +0000 UTC]

super focus. parca se vad mici picaturi de apa pe acolo. mi-ar fi placut poate mai mult cu putin spatiu in plus sus.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to sadik18 [2009-04-07 20:49:05 +0000 UTC]

Focusul a fost cel mai dificil, cum de altfel cam e la pozele facute cu tehnica asta. Dar imi place si mie cum a iesit.
Nu cred ca-s picaturi de apa, more like chestii excretate de floare, ceva de genu. Apa in nici un caz oricum.
Cand am incadrat-o, am urmarit orientarea ei, si fiind in jos, am decis sa las spatiul de jos mai mare. Stiu ca e chestie destul de evidenta si total ne-iesita din comun, dar eu asa am vazut-o.
Am incercat in post procesare sa o recompun, dar nici o varianta nu mi-a placut.

Mersi!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CaterpillarPatison [2009-04-05 15:56:37 +0000 UTC]

aww

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to CaterpillarPatison [2009-04-05 16:02:00 +0000 UTC]


👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SmokeStories [2009-04-05 10:57:03 +0000 UTC]

featured:[link]


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to SmokeStories [2009-04-05 11:39:53 +0000 UTC]

Sarumana Ana!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SmokeStories In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-05 11:52:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

addicted-to-memories [2009-04-04 16:08:07 +0000 UTC]

cat de frumoasa e poza! bravo! :joy:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to addicted-to-memories [2009-04-05 09:04:50 +0000 UTC]

Mersi frumos!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

addicted-to-memories In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-05 09:31:32 +0000 UTC]

nu ai pt ce,my dear.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to addicted-to-memories [2009-04-05 09:45:40 +0000 UTC]


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

addicted-to-memories In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-05 09:58:57 +0000 UTC]

ai raspuns la orice replica ) imi place!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to addicted-to-memories [2009-04-05 10:11:47 +0000 UTC]

I try to do my best!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

addicted-to-memories In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 12:03:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

azrael-x64 [2009-04-04 13:19:40 +0000 UTC]

eram sigur ca-i reversed

apropo, am incercat sa fac niste poze la un ochi in camera... seara... cu el reversed la 55mm parca. pauza lumina; am incercat cu blitz la +2 cu bounce
am omorat-o saraca

e foarte greu fara lumina buna sa faci ceva ca lumea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to azrael-x64 [2009-04-05 09:09:25 +0000 UTC]

Cred ca cel mai bine e sa incerci chestia asta cu ochiul pe lumina de zi, mai ales ca e destul soare zilele astea. Doar ca tot o s-o cam omori!

Eu am avut noroc ca batea soarele prin geam, si era oarecum destula lumina, da si eu am tras de iso, desi vad ca ar fi mers bine si cu un iso 800.
Incearca sa faci cu rafala, si sa te apropii incet incet in timp ce trage cadrele. Mult mai eficient decat cu single shot.

Bafta la experimentat!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

azrael-x64 In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-05 09:16:12 +0000 UTC]

mersi

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Whimsical-Dreams [2009-04-04 03:42:10 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful flower shot, though I wish the beginning of it was more in focus, it's so lovely I love the lighting in this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to Whimsical-Dreams [2009-04-05 09:04:30 +0000 UTC]

I tried to take all in focus, but the light wasn't strong enough to allow me to close the aperture more, so I had to stick the wide open aperture = very shallow dof.

Thank you so much for the beautiful words!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Whimsical-Dreams In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 01:34:07 +0000 UTC]

Thats understandable, it's a lovely photograph, well done ! I can't wait to see more from you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to Whimsical-Dreams [2009-04-06 06:22:38 +0000 UTC]

I'll try not to dissapoint!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Whimsical-Dreams In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 06:24:01 +0000 UTC]

aww you never do disappoint me stay happy~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to Whimsical-Dreams [2009-04-06 10:33:28 +0000 UTC]

I will!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Whimsical-Dreams In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 10:57:51 +0000 UTC]

<33

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to Whimsical-Dreams [2009-04-06 11:36:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-03 22:55:40 +0000 UTC]

"Critique not desired"?
aham, anyway, zilele astea am pus mana pe un 450d .. si am facut si eu cateva shots reversed.. de'abea astept sa ajung acasa sa le pun
super poza, btw !

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SideVVays In reply to And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-04 08:17:15 +0000 UTC]

Ce "Critique not desired"???
Unde scrie ca eu nu vad.

Uuuuu
Tare. Pai astept sa le vad!
Mersi!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

And-I-Walk-Alone In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 10:03:38 +0000 UTC]

Acuma nu mai scrie.
O sa le veeezi... soon..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-06 11:39:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

And-I-Walk-Alone In reply to And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-03 22:57:24 +0000 UTC]

p.s: astia de la hotel d'aci au un net de c***t, nu mere sa dau fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-04 08:18:02 +0000 UTC]

Eh, lasa, e ok.
Te revansezi la altele!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

And-I-Walk-Alone In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-06 10:03:05 +0000 UTC]

Gata am ajuns acas. Ti-am dat si fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to And-I-Walk-Alone [2009-04-06 11:40:19 +0000 UTC]

Asa!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pepytta [2009-04-03 18:16:38 +0000 UTC]

featured: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SideVVays In reply to pepytta [2009-04-03 18:36:56 +0000 UTC]

Mersi Mada!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pepytta In reply to SideVVays [2009-04-03 18:49:36 +0000 UTC]

cu placere

👍: 0 ⏩: 0