HOME | DD

stampystampy โ€” Science

Published: 2008-05-22 18:31:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 14524; Favourites: 1556; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Science is Awesome
Related content
Comments: 146

DannySamFanMan [2021-09-15 02:31:12 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

SweetSmurfMarissa [2019-01-29 00:55:11 +0000 UTC]

I love Science

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

puppettoons21 [2018-05-01 01:25:20 +0000 UTC]

I used to love it, till I got a super bitchy teacher

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

RomeOfTheAges [2015-11-11 02:29:36 +0000 UTC]

I think science is A W E S O M E and i'm Christian and go to a Christian school and my favorite subject is science

๐Ÿ‘: 1 โฉ: 1

Paulthored In reply to RomeOfTheAges [2016-11-19 09:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for someone else who gets it.โœŒ๐Ÿ˜‡โœ

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

DragonQuestWes [2015-07-10 07:01:05 +0000 UTC]

None of us would be alive without it.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Vaya-Dragon [2015-05-24 13:20:27 +0000 UTC]



Science is so amazing!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

IntellectualVortex [2015-02-17 23:49:42 +0000 UTC]

I wholeheartedly agree.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Paulthored [2015-02-03 23:29:54 +0000 UTC]

Yes, science can be awesome.
so long as those who study it don't forget that science doesn't/can't answer ALL the questions without becoming a Religion.


---Personally, I've a reasonably high IQ, try my paupers best to keep up with current science/plus studies, & am willing in limited engagement to debate my Faith--- I have yet to encounter a single argument, fact, or accepted theory that can be honestly said, from both perspectives, to invalidate my Faith or religion. quite the opposite in fact...

๐Ÿ‘: 1 โฉ: 1

Asterion608 In reply to Paulthored [2016-11-11 19:31:32 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-12 21:58:15 +0000 UTC]

Then your relationship with science, is that of religious belief in it.

In other words: Science is Your Religion.

Or at least, the version of Science that fits your definition of science, is your religious beliefs.
Currently, science may make a hypothetical generalization of understanding about the local galaxy/galactic cluster that is correct for approximately a maximum of 5.01% of said space. This is because Dark Matter/Energy is non-visible and make up roughly 95% of the gravity producing mass in this space. And about all we know is that it's there and producing gravity.

Frankly, I find, that my Faith(Religion; Lutheran --- WELS) find's science acceptable to a greater extent, then the Atheist biased ''science" promoted by anti-religious/Anti-theists/anti-existence-of-GOD/anti-Christian Bigotry/Hate groups, find's my Faith.

โœŒ๐Ÿ˜‡โœ

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Asterion608 In reply to Paulthored [2016-11-12 22:14:32 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 2

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-13 00:52:25 +0000 UTC]

Durnit!! Missed the second half of your post!

My only comment is asking, "If religion is dying, why do I keep running into Atheists??"

Timing out, ltr. โœŒ๐Ÿ˜Ž

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-13 00:45:25 +0000 UTC]

And your position is disproven scientifically.

"Science can never be a religion"---??? How??? How can someone, who is promoting "science", make that claim with a straight face is beyond sanity. Your OWN post is basically saying that it's UNSCIENTIFIC to make this claim.

Also, so you question everything by automatically dismissing the questions raised by my Faith?? Just because they are raised by members of a religion, doesn't mean that you can just dismiss them as having no basis in reality. Especially since I've yet to hear/learn about a specific scientific theory/evidence that invalidates my Faith, let alone my religion. Science/Religion can be wrong. My Faith, and particularly the Bible, can't be wrong for it's the TRUTH.

How to get my view on this across...
Big Bang? First proposed by a priest trying to figure out what Creation(He spoke! And there was...) Looked like.

Evolution?? So GOD gave life the ability to adapt to its environment, you still haven't provided decent evidence of so much as single cell to multicellular life. Let alone the unbroken chain of evolution needed to take random nonliving amino acids all the way to even non-sentient pre-human primate's.(note: I'm talking about the differences between micro(dog breeds/white vs Asian) & marco(flea to kangaroo/frog to whale/fish to snake) evolution.)

Age of the Universe, appearing to be billions of years???: The WoW hypothesis. (Explanation: the game, World of Warcraft, has been around for not even half my lifetime, yet in game, it has a rich history going back several million years. Indeed, some characters claim age's of millennia. Yet for all that, we Know that 30+ years ago, Warcraft wasn't even an idea.) And the much more serious... GOD created a universe in motion and as is. Like with Adam, he doesn't have to wait 20+ years for Adam to grow, Adam is created Fully formed and with all the appropriate knowledge for that time and place.

Peace to you!โœŒ๐Ÿ˜‡โœ
โœŒ๐Ÿ˜Ž

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Asterion608 In reply to Paulthored [2016-11-13 01:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2021-11-10 06:11:51 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

yudrontheglatorian [2014-11-06 20:09:02 +0000 UTC]

science is not really the enemy of the faith.

๐Ÿ‘: 1 โฉ: 2

MapsNStuff In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2015-08-04 05:29:16 +0000 UTC]

You my friend, speak the truth

๐Ÿ‘: 1 โฉ: 0

Paulthored In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2015-02-03 23:20:26 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, who do you think first came up with the big Bang theory??

A Christian Priest, That's who!!---note: beyond that, meh, I have a hard time with names & dates...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Asterion608 In reply to Paulthored [2016-11-11 19:33:29 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-19 03:07:37 +0000 UTC]

www.bede.org.uk/university.htm

www.quora.com/Why-did-science-โ€ฆ

Firstly, think before you make claims like that again.
Secondly, why the HATE Speech?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Asterion608 In reply to Paulthored [2016-11-19 03:25:35 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 2

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-19 21:55:14 +0000 UTC]

www.google.com/search?q=amazonโ€ฆ

You mean these history books?

www.amazon.com/Science-Middle-โ€ฆ
Science in the Middle Ages (Chicago History of Science and Medicine)

---

www.amazon.com/Genesis-Scienceโ€ฆ
The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution
"Here are some facts you probably didn't learn in school:
People in the Middle Ages did not think the world was flat--in fact, medieval scholars could prove it wasn't;
The Inquisition never executed anyone because of their scientific ideas or discoveries (actually, the Church was the chief sponsor of scientific research and several popes were celebrated for their knowledge of the subject);
It was medieval scientific discoveries, methods, and principles that made possible western civilization's "Scientific Revolution".

If you were taught that the Middle Ages were a time of intellectual stagnation, superstition, and ignorance, you were taught a myth that has been utterly refuted by modern scholarship"

---

www.amazon.com/Foundations-Modโ€ฆ
The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages: Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts (Cambridge Studies in the History of Science)
" Review
"This masterful study affirms the traditional view of the beginning of modern science -- with its emphasis upon experimentation, its concept of the progress and perpetuation of science, and its actual institutionalization -- in seventeenth-century Europe." Bradford B. Blaine, Historian

Book Description
Contrary to prevailing opinion, the roots of modern science were planted in the ancient and medieval worlds long before the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century. This volume illustrates the developments and discoveries that culminated in the Revolution. "

---
www.amazon.com/Beginnings-Westโ€ฆ
The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450 2nd ed. Edition
---
www.amazon.com/Dark-Ages-Medieโ€ฆ
Dark Ages in Medieval History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 4)

---
www.amazon.com/Scientific-Achiโ€ฆ
The Scientific Achievement of the Middle Ages (The Middle Ages Series)
---

Citation sources, that are outright dismissing your currently unfounded claims, 5 through 10+...
Whilst all your efforts seem to remain on promoting a view of history that's increasingly difficult to rationalize as anything else but seriously outdated and/or obviously false. If it's not outright made-up anti-Catholic propaganda that is reinforcing your Confirmation Bias.

Also... Have a Happy Thanksgiving if you're in the USA.
โœŒ๐Ÿ˜ธ

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Paulthored In reply to Asterion608 [2016-11-19 09:45:16 +0000 UTC]

The notion that the Middle Ages, particularly the 'Dark Ages' (now referred to as the 'Early Middle-Ages') were a time of darkness where religious leaders suppressed scientific advancement has in fact been widely discredited and is now considered untrue by most historians. --- tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.phpโ€ฆ

In 1927, the Belgian Catholic priest Georges Lemaรฎtre proposed an expanding model for the universe to explain the observed redshifts of spiral nebulae, and calculated the Hubble law. ---en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historโ€ฆ

That last link gives me a fourth source of citation. I'm sorry, but you're clearly spreading false/outdated information.
โœŒ๐Ÿ˜‰

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

RollerTrack3 [2014-10-05 00:14:24 +0000 UTC]

Yes, yes it is.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

PosterScience [2014-08-04 13:47:10 +0000 UTC]

Without a doubt.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

shortestb1rd [2014-05-31 18:16:07 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it is!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

EagleHawkAZ [2014-04-10 00:28:11 +0000 UTC]

thumbnail?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

GloryAngel [2014-03-19 18:22:11 +0000 UTC]

I heart science.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

CaliClawPaw [2013-11-24 21:48:43 +0000 UTC]

SCIENCE FTW

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Pikachu4807 [2013-10-02 05:04:08 +0000 UTC]

Science is amazing.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

MoonNight7 [2013-09-13 04:59:19 +0000 UTC]

Nuff said'


Signature:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba3kweโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

CareDuck [2013-08-17 19:48:49 +0000 UTC]

I don'tย understand how anyone who hasn't read TEOTS can not like science.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Fregatto [2013-07-29 16:51:18 +0000 UTC]

Done!ย 

martesmf.deviantart.com/journaโ€ฆ


Have a relly nice day!ย 

ย 

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Reznov1941 [2013-07-15 09:04:51 +0000 UTC]

BILL NYE THE MOTHERFUCKING BOWTIE WEARIN SCIENTIFICLY PURE SCIENCE SCIENCE GUY

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

shortestb1rd In reply to Reznov1941 [2014-05-31 18:17:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes! bill nye is awesome!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Reznov1941 In reply to shortestb1rd [2014-06-02 03:04:07 +0000 UTC]

Bill Nyeitch please!I can educate and have fun!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

derpwolf21 [2013-05-30 02:01:28 +0000 UTC]

U bet ur butt it is.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

danielmathers [2013-05-17 14:11:15 +0000 UTC]

yes it is but sad that most of the world is supressed by religion,looks and other fake stuff

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Paulthored In reply to danielmathers [2015-02-03 23:35:48 +0000 UTC]



like atheism/anti-theism...ย ย  Praying to their great 'God doesn't exist & we can't be religious because of the belief of that'-Idol, to save them from the big bad scary religious persecution they suffer under...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Derp-My-Life [2013-05-10 02:20:31 +0000 UTC]

... and if you don't agree, you can fuck off.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Akumu098 [2013-04-08 18:47:45 +0000 UTC]

I'm not even joking when I state that I silently scream out to myself in joy "SCIENCE!!!!!" whenever I see the word "science".
....SCIENCE

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Reznov1941 In reply to Akumu098 [2013-07-15 09:06:31 +0000 UTC]

SCIENCE AND SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!!!!!!!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Shikahr24 [2013-01-25 02:46:27 +0000 UTC]

so it is

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

YoSop [2012-12-02 00:50:59 +0000 UTC]

It definitely does. It's my highest
subject actually.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

PinwheelStudios In reply to YoSop [2013-08-20 23:41:50 +0000 UTC]

Same here!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

YoSop In reply to PinwheelStudios [2013-08-23 01:49:04 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

PinwheelStudios In reply to YoSop [2013-08-23 02:11:40 +0000 UTC]

yerple,

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Pop-Tart-Zombie [2012-09-29 23:43:23 +0000 UTC]

Science rules. *Hah, Bill Nye...*

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

CelticIrishgirl [2012-09-17 20:31:12 +0000 UTC]

I agree. Yes, I am Christan, and my parents let me take science. (Well, in public scholls you do, I don't know why) I'm not someone who believes what others say. I have to see it myself, or, I turn to science shows. >:3

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1


| Next =>