HOME | DD

Taggerung1 — Legotian Space Command

Published: 2009-07-27 20:10:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 2458; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 20
Redirect to original
Description This picture made me realize that I've only got 3 or 4 original spacecraft. Everything else is just sets. (usually modified) I need to work on this.

The Legotian Armed Forces Space Command Division is responsible for all space capable vehicles, including capital ships. (not pictured here)

Left to right

Back row: Lambda class Shuttle, TIE Fighter (x3), B-Wing (x2), TIE 'D' Fighter, TIE X-1

Next row: TIE Bomber, TIE Interceptor, Insectoid Starship, Vulture Droid (x2), Droid Tri-Fighter, Eta 2 "Actis" Jedi Interceptor

Next row: Slave 1 (Jango), Slave 1 (Boba), Insectoid Starfighter (x2), Bi-Wing Blaster (x2), Millennium Falcon

Next row: Alien Avenger, Mosquito Scout (x7), Sonic Stinger, Alpha-3 V-Wing, Delta-4 "Trainer"

The rest: ARC-170, BTL A-4 Y-Wing, T-65 X-Wing, N-1 Naboo Starfighter, T-65 X-Wing, Delta-7 "Aethersprite" Interceptor, Rz-1 A-Wing (x2)


PS. When I said "Mosquito Scout" it was in reference to the Beta Buzzers. A book I have refers to them as that, and the name just stuck. (It sounds cooler too)
Related content
Comments: 98

Taggerung1 In reply to ??? [2017-09-26 20:24:01 +0000 UTC]

I have the classic B-wing, but it's not built.  And I also have the newer Eta-2 Actis Jedi Interceptors for both Anakin and Obi-wan, and I rebuilt them both as custom, better looking ones.
Also, since this picture, I've gotten two more Y-wings, another X-wing, two A-wings, another Lambda class shuttle, TIE Fighter, TIE X-1, two T-47 Snowspeeders, and a bunch of other things.  Needs an update.. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Timscorpion [2012-07-30 21:07:38 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, but I would like for you to cut out all the trade lines and remove anything Lego Star Wars related.

Just to keep Lucasarts out of the picture and to make it entirely made by Lego.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Timscorpion [2012-07-31 01:08:52 +0000 UTC]

You have something against LucasArts?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Timscorpion In reply to Taggerung1 [2012-07-31 01:54:28 +0000 UTC]

No.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Timscorpion [2012-07-31 03:21:05 +0000 UTC]

Well then what's the problem? More importantly, why are you asking me to remove my Lego Star Wars sets?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Timscorpion In reply to Taggerung1 [2012-07-31 11:20:14 +0000 UTC]

Not sure, but it may have something to do with a misleading title, such as if its "Lego" space command, then there would be more original lego space sets than LSW sets. and the picture here clearly states the opposite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Timscorpion [2012-08-01 15:10:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh. In that case, an explanation is in order.

The Legotian Space Command is a branch of the Military in what I long ago cleverly named my Legotian Empire. Essentially it was the name I gave to my collection, as it was built into a city. It is not representative of what sets Lego had made, but rather of what sets I have. The facts that I 1: am a big fan of Star Wars, and 2: didn't really start collecting until 1999, at the end of the good Lego Space themes, both explain why I have a lot more Star Wars ships than other things.

For what it's worth, the big Insectoid ship in there is built out of a bunch of other Insectoid sets.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sporemin [2011-10-15 18:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Quite Diverse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Sporemin [2011-10-30 22:23:04 +0000 UTC]

We like to diversify a little. It gives us options, and at the same time makes us look good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-24 18:50:07 +0000 UTC]

they must be really cheap around there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-24 20:14:56 +0000 UTC]

Lol, I wish...

Nope, that's just the result of b-days and Christmases, and bargain hunting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-24 20:45:13 +0000 UTC]

well ppl around here usually give clothes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-24 22:31:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well, they tried that, but... I have moderately wealthy relatives...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-24 22:50:34 +0000 UTC]

so it IS cheap!! (for them! )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-24 22:53:06 +0000 UTC]

...Of course last year, I only got three very small sets... I'll have to aim bigger, and pester more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-24 22:59:59 +0000 UTC]

ǝɹǝɥ ɹǝʌo ǝɯos puǝs puɐ ¡ɹǝʇsǝd ¡ɹǝʇsǝd 'ɥo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-24 23:08:17 +0000 UTC]

Lol, why is your text all upside down?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-24 23:37:54 +0000 UTC]

ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ƃuıʇıɹʍ ǝʞıן ʇןǝɟ ʇsnɾ ı 'ɥǝɯ

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-25 00:02:15 +0000 UTC]

Okay...

I forgot to respond when you said " ǝɹǝɥ ɹǝʌo ǝɯos puǝs puɐ ¡ɹǝʇsǝd ¡ɹǝʇsǝd 'ɥo".

It's... mine. ...My own. ...My... Precious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-25 00:09:02 +0000 UTC]

¿ɯǝɥʇ ʇnoqɐ ʎzɐɹɔ ǝɹoɯ ǝɥʇ s,oɥʍ ssǝnƃ 'uʍop ǝpısdn ƃuıʇıɹʍ ǝuo ǝɥʇ ɯı ǝɔuıs ʇnq

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-25 01:23:50 +0000 UTC]

Uuuh... Me? Because I'm actually writing upside down twice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-25 15:00:10 +0000 UTC]

woah, it works! its great! and noone would guess im doing it! but its double the work though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-25 20:16:23 +0000 UTC]

...But seriously, how the heck do you do that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-26 04:11:52 +0000 UTC]

¿ʇɐɥʍ op

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-26 07:15:59 +0000 UTC]

The upside down text. I don't know how you do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-26 20:12:46 +0000 UTC]

¿ǝǝs n 'sıɥʇ ǝʞıן sʇı 'ʎsɐǝ sʇɐɥʇ 'ɥo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-27 00:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Oh... I get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-27 00:52:06 +0000 UTC]

(check my favs for clues )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-27 02:38:53 +0000 UTC]

Ah... Okay, now I get it.

Odd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-27 13:50:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-27 21:14:16 +0000 UTC]

So... What were we talking about?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-28 06:12:39 +0000 UTC]

about marla, and tyler

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-28 17:54:40 +0000 UTC]

Wut?
You lost me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-11-28 20:51:38 +0000 UTC]

mmm are u lost? are u in an island?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-11-29 23:30:37 +0000 UTC]

Yes... yes I am.


...Sea turtles, mate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-01 06:00:11 +0000 UTC]

no, back hair!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-01 07:13:23 +0000 UTC]

Well, that too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-01 22:00:23 +0000 UTC]

but the rum is vital to all endeavors

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-02 01:34:27 +0000 UTC]

So that was the problem! Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the ship that got totaled at the end of At World's End called the Endeavor?

Endeavor had no rum, and therefore died.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-02 02:30:02 +0000 UTC]

certainly but the ship's name was "endeavour" (with a "u" )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-02 04:57:19 +0000 UTC]

I thought so, but the spell check didn't like it that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-02 07:06:00 +0000 UTC]

sure, it wont say anything about color/colour and harbor/harbour (among others) either. i told it to

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-02 15:25:37 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but I think it hardly matters anymore, given that most internet users have little to no concern for proper grammar, punctuation or spelling.

The English language is changing faster than anyone knows...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-02 23:08:05 +0000 UTC]

han who knows?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-03 01:13:13 +0000 UTC]

Everyone. Everywhere. Forever. Until Tuesday. Whut? Now I'm confused...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-03 01:48:58 +0000 UTC]

not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-03 21:59:21 +0000 UTC]

Sure.

Or not.

I'm not sure if I'm sure or not.

And I'm not sure what I'm not sure about being sure about, or not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-03 23:38:23 +0000 UTC]

then u do!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Taggerung1 In reply to Blackfire-Dragon [2010-12-04 01:27:16 +0000 UTC]

I do!?!?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blackfire-Dragon In reply to Taggerung1 [2010-12-04 04:03:33 +0000 UTC]

yes, u do!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>