HOME | DD

TomCatDriver β€” Sand Cat

Published: 2011-07-29 05:12:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 1058; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description overview of Iranian Air Force F-14A Tom/Ali-Cat with wings in full sweep configuration. the contractor,s paint department had to follow the specified camo pattern precisely on all examples.
Related content
Comments: 52

TomCatDriver In reply to ??? [2011-08-04 10:19:37 +0000 UTC]

necessary evils....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

i8l90 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-08-04 14:38:18 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to i8l90 [2011-08-04 19:23:50 +0000 UTC]

not my problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

i8l90 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-08-04 19:25:37 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to i8l90 [2011-08-04 22:14:51 +0000 UTC]

at least give them a few points for ambition.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

i8l90 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-08-04 22:24:15 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to i8l90 [2011-08-04 23:46:25 +0000 UTC]

ok,don,t stir up any "sediment"...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

i8l90 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-08-04 23:54:34 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to i8l90 [2011-08-04 23:56:32 +0000 UTC]

yep.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bear48 In reply to ??? [2011-07-30 00:18:31 +0000 UTC]

sweet job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bear48 [2011-07-30 01:21:47 +0000 UTC]

it was a bit of work,but worth it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bakerman70 In reply to ??? [2011-07-29 16:15:47 +0000 UTC]

Iranian jet, huh? About time you did some more awesome art. How do you glue it all together without it getting messy? Great job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to bakerman70 [2011-07-29 17:37:17 +0000 UTC]

just a matter of experience....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tank50us In reply to ??? [2011-07-29 06:54:05 +0000 UTC]

it's gonna be sad when we have to engage these in combat, but I guess it'll be better for them to be scrap then be in the hands of the axis of evil that is Iran.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

Aya-Wavedancer In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 16:58:47 +0000 UTC]

IIRC fewer than 6 of them are flyable. The Phoenix missles have been out of service for over a decade, they supposedly have some type of jury-rigged system for the I-Hawk SAM.

THey're no real issue anymore. The real issue is their Nuclear Weapons research program, not an Air Force using SU-25's and modified F-5's for their main weapons...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

putrick In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 08:55:39 +0000 UTC]

China would love that, pour your money into the next black hole, Iraq and Afghanistan wasnΒ΄t enough? At some point the creditors wants their money back...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tank50us In reply to putrick [2011-07-29 16:36:10 +0000 UTC]

and I'd just tell them "Thanks for the donation", seeing as they still owe us from when we kicked the Japanese out in WW2. And what I'm talking about is Irans saber rattling, eventually, they're going to make a play for Iraq as a stepping stone to go after Israel. If they do that, we'll be obligated to assist (Israel being an Ally and all). And if China got involved on Irans side (which I see as likely), then we'll have to take them on as well, and it will be tech with high training VS good tech and high numbers.

Arm chair generals rejoice! (let's face it, we all can see this coming)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 18:22:05 +0000 UTC]

Well, good luck with that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tank50us In reply to putrick [2011-07-29 18:35:32 +0000 UTC]

well, if they did it right now, our glorious fearless leader will probably let them do it... since he has no back bone what-so-ever.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 19:28:12 +0000 UTC]

I agree, health care and less in national debt sucks. The US needs more guns, planes and nukes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tank50us In reply to putrick [2011-07-29 19:37:29 +0000 UTC]

Our soldiers need a new weapon that's more reliable, we do need new-build aircraft to replace some of the aging airframes, and we do need an effective replacement for the Minuteman Missile that's more accurate, and delivers more bang for the buck. But we also need jobs, and it's sad when hicks can see what's needed, and the Harvard educated politicians can't, and even I can figure out how to fund the projects.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 20:53:25 +0000 UTC]

Reagan called it "Supply-side economics" and it will make China the No.1 economy in 2050. He made the American people think that they can have the cake and eat the cake. And now, the US pours money into more holes that wonΒ΄t yield any return what so ever.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TomCatDriver In reply to Tank50us [2011-07-29 06:59:55 +0000 UTC]

let,s hope it never comes down to that.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfman-053 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-07-29 14:13:02 +0000 UTC]

So say we all...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Wolfman-053 [2011-07-29 14:46:41 +0000 UTC]

most of us,anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfman-053 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-07-29 14:49:51 +0000 UTC]

Point taken.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Wolfman-053 [2011-07-29 14:51:12 +0000 UTC]

War is bad,War is Ugly,War Sucks...avoid it whenever we can...!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfman-053 In reply to TomCatDriver [2011-07-29 14:56:43 +0000 UTC]

No kidding!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TomCatDriver In reply to Wolfman-053 [2011-07-29 14:58:14 +0000 UTC]

i know how it feels too....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |