HOME | DD

tylero79 β€” AV series of rifles

Published: 2012-03-26 03:46:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 7706; Favourites: 87; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description Avtomaticheskaya Vintovka means automatic rifle in Russian. Used heavily by the Russian Union, it is an easily modifiable rifle, making it the staple of the Russian war machine. It is a very simple weapon to produce, and its internal workings and tight rifling help cause the rifle's high stopping power and semi-auto accuracy, but in full auto its difficult to control the recoil. It has a high rate of fire at 1000 rpm. It is frequently seen across the Contested Fields and on the Vistula Fortress Line. Due to the vast numbers of these rifles produced, it is not uncommon for it to be issued to entire divisions outside the Russian Union, notably the German-Polish Reich and the Scandinavian Union who both face constant invasions by the Russian Union. The AV's unique front sight alsoriflescopes as the sights for a grenade launcher, mostly the GP-50. Introduced in 2014 to replace the Kalashnikov series of rifles, the AV-97 has seen widespread use thoughout the world. Designed by Colonel-General Vladislav Maximovich Yashin since 1997, the Russian military was quickly impressed by the weapon. In 2015, they used units armed with these new rifles to stage a coup, replacing the Russian Federation with the militant Russian Union. With the USA collapsing along with NATO, the Russian Union used this weakness to invade Europe. While the AV-97 was highly effective, allowing the Russian military to conquer most of eastern Poland, the Baltics, half the Ukraine, and most of Finland. Belarus was spared, having joined the Union a few months earlier. Eventually the Russians were driven back to their current border, but Europe was changed forever.

The AV-97 is the most standard variant of these weapons. Developed to replace the AK's, the AV-97 has been widely praised for its stopping power. Uses the 7.62x39mm round.

The AV-98 was introduced to use the 5.45x39mm rounds used by the AK-74. Not as widely seen as the 97.

Used almost extensively by the elite Streltsy Guards, the AV-99 is chambered for the 7.62x54mmR. It is also used by snipers.

The AV-100 is chambered for the 5.56x45mm NATO round found in the M-16 and its derivatives. While not widely seen in Russian service, it is widely used by troops in the Scandinavian Union who have converted it to use local rounds. The Russian War Ministry nonetheless gave it this designation.

The AV-101 uses the 7.62x51mm NATO round. Widely used by the Russian Army and the German-Polish Reich for snipers and platoon commanders. Used in the Russian military due to it having great stopping power, and is slightly more easy to control then the AV-99.

AV-102 is chambered for the .50 BMG. A sniper rifle, the AV-102 is single shot, yet uses a 5 round mag. The weapon's operator has to manually extract the casing from its undersized ejector port. Commonly titled the "Oprichnina".

Union Weaponry-[link]
AR-12-[link]
AV-97, original-[link] [link]
AV-99-[link]
AV-102 Redesigned- [link]
GP-50-[link]
AP-9-[link]
APP-9-[link]
RPYa-27-[link]
K34-[link]
AV Front Sight Code-[link]
AV's-[link]
Related content
Comments: 31

123er33 [2014-08-31 12:19:15 +0000 UTC]

50 BMG rifle?!! LoL

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to 123er33 [2014-08-31 23:47:37 +0000 UTC]

fav.me/d60bqtj
This is the redesign. But yes, it uses the .50 BMG round so it can use capture ammo from Western Europe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

123er33 In reply to tylero79 [2014-09-07 07:14:27 +0000 UTC]

Rifles for 7.62, 5.45 and .50 BMG have totally theΒ same body? Bro, they will not work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to 123er33 [2014-09-07 07:33:34 +0000 UTC]

That's why I redesigned the .50 cal. As for the 7.62x39mm and 5.45x39mm, look at the AK-47 and 74. Same basic body, just resized chamber and barrel

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

blahman10 [2014-01-28 20:30:20 +0000 UTC]

Never heard of it


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to blahman10 [2014-01-29 04:36:07 +0000 UTC]

'Cus it's not real

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blahman10 In reply to tylero79 [2014-02-03 04:54:09 +0000 UTC]

Kinda figured that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

prokhorvlg [2012-08-28 11:45:58 +0000 UTC]

"Avtomat Vintovka" does not mean Automatic Rifle. First off, you can just say either "avtomat" (automatic weapon) or "vintovka" (rifle) for the same effect. Also, it could also be said "Avtomaticheskaya Vintovka", which means automatic rifle for real. Don't trust google translate. Using "Avtomaticheskaya Vintovka" will retain your AV prefix though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

tylero79 In reply to prokhorvlg [2012-08-28 21:00:00 +0000 UTC]

To true about Google. I guess I'll change it to its correct name.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prokhorvlg In reply to tylero79 [2012-08-28 21:18:38 +0000 UTC]

Dude, don't trust google translate. It sucks at translating.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to prokhorvlg [2012-08-28 23:00:45 +0000 UTC]

Yup. I learned that when helping to translate someones comic into English

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

prokhorvlg In reply to prokhorvlg [2012-08-28 11:55:56 +0000 UTC]

Also, why would any army even consider fielding this weapon in the first place? There is always the AK, just as cheap but way more effective than this. Comparison to AK fails it in almost any aspect. Where's the fire selector? Imagine the recoil on this weapon (it is an AK variant) combined with a grip - that wedges your thumb between reciever and grip... ouch. Would choose any AK over this, to be honest.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Top-Agent-PGG-jr In reply to prokhorvlg [2015-08-13 07:24:57 +0000 UTC]

The same reason as to why the M14 and the M16 rifles are adopted despite their obvious flaws.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prokhorvlg In reply to Top-Agent-PGG-jr [2015-08-13 07:31:55 +0000 UTC]

Damn dude, it's been 3 years.

Anyway, looking back at this, you're wrong. The M14 was fielded because it was the best weapon for cost weapon at the time. So was the M16. In this case, the alternative is the AK-74 or pretty much any modern AK type weapon which will outperform this one, AND they are cheap.

Either way, if the glaring flaws that I posted 3 years ago are fixed, I think that it would be a viable - unrealistic, but viable - main service rifle. I mean, even if you go easy on the gun, and say that the internal function doesn't matter, it doesn't have a fire selector which is a vital piece of equipment IE the weapon wont work without one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Top-Agent-PGG-jr In reply to prokhorvlg [2015-08-13 07:42:37 +0000 UTC]

True. Cost has always been the main concern for armies before function which is a close second. This may explain why the M4 carbine has not been totally replaced even though there are better alternatives.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prokhorvlg In reply to Top-Agent-PGG-jr [2015-08-13 08:07:29 +0000 UTC]

I believe this may be the precise reason why it hasn't been replaced yet. Replacing a ton of military hardware like that, which is still completely functional, may prove to be somewhat redundant in the general sense.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Heiryuu [2012-03-27 15:33:37 +0000 UTC]

dang it well this is one design i can scrap. this looks very cool, though the clips don't seem to fit right.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

prokhorvlg In reply to Heiryuu [2012-08-28 11:41:33 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Heiryuu In reply to prokhorvlg [2012-08-28 14:55:32 +0000 UTC]

thank you. i knew this already but it's hard to break a habit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tylero79 In reply to Heiryuu [2012-03-27 21:12:35 +0000 UTC]

That space is there to show the cheapness of the weapon

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DroidOps [2012-03-27 07:25:28 +0000 UTC]

Epic but.. The magazine placement is akward. :I

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to DroidOps [2012-03-27 20:49:22 +0000 UTC]

I've noticed that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DroidOps [2012-03-27 07:24:51 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to DroidOps [2012-03-27 20:49:27 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

543Bs0Za [2012-03-26 14:40:07 +0000 UTC]

the bmg has the same upper and lower as a normal ak and would never accept such a large round. equally size up the parts to accept the larger round

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

tylero79 In reply to 543Bs0Za [2012-06-21 00:25:56 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tylero79 In reply to 543Bs0Za [2012-03-26 21:57:07 +0000 UTC]

I realized that after I saved it and exited out

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

W-E-E-B-Z In reply to 543Bs0Za [2012-03-26 16:04:41 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. Also on the .50 version, it sounds simpler to just make it completely single shot with no magazine. The pressure behind the spring in the magazine would just make the problem worse.

Different calibers use different barrels and different receivers. Change accordingly :/
(And no, don't bring the Colt CM901 up for argument on that because you change the internals as well as the barrel for different calibers.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to W-E-E-B-Z [2012-06-21 00:26:09 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

96blackarrow [2012-03-26 04:28:23 +0000 UTC]

Aww,nice design,like kalashnikov variants

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

tylero79 In reply to 96blackarrow [2012-03-26 04:38:21 +0000 UTC]

THanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0