HOME | DD

unusualsuspex β€” Saturn V Command Module Tech Readout [new]

Published: 2014-07-29 22:23:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 5867; Favourites: 65; Downloads: 363
Redirect to original
Description en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_C…

Command Module - Fort Opus
Related content
Comments: 11

captain-harker [2023-10-20 01:52:00 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2014-07-30 05:08:56 +0000 UTC]

Very cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Patriot1776 In reply to Midway2009 [2015-03-20 22:25:15 +0000 UTC]

And the Orion Capsule is bringing this old-school way of flying into the 21st Century.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Nevacrest In reply to Patriot1776 [2015-09-14 00:59:57 +0000 UTC]

Yes, unfortunately. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Patriot1776 In reply to Nevacrest [2015-09-14 01:58:45 +0000 UTC]

In order for spaceplane-based systems, a next-gen Space Shuttle if you will, to become safe enough to use again, we need drastically improved propulsion technologies, Star Trek-like fusion-powered Impulse Engines ideally, so that we can eliminate the need for a giant external tank and solid rocket boosters.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nevacrest In reply to Patriot1776 [2015-09-15 00:53:24 +0000 UTC]

I'm willing to wait until someone takes the SpaceShipTwo system, and upgrades it to TSTO capability by developing a hypersonic version of the WhiteKnight carrier plane.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Patriot1776 In reply to Nevacrest [2015-09-15 01:13:46 +0000 UTC]

Hmm...intriguing... do you think a TSTO SpaceShipTwo could be upgraded further to get any cargo loads to orbit? Β I know Space-X already getting some of the unmanned satellite launches now, but if the SpaceShipTwo system is capable of being uprated to TSTO and so now basic fully orbital commercial tourism missions could be done, could the same platform permit building of a private space station? Β Kind of a stretch I know, just asking. Β Space-X still hasn't yet gotten to the point of recovering their boosters yet.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nevacrest In reply to Patriot1776 [2015-09-15 01:20:38 +0000 UTC]

Forget Space-X, and their 1950's way of thinking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Patriot1776 In reply to Nevacrest [2015-09-14 01:55:12 +0000 UTC]

Why is this a bad thing? Β We never lost any astronauts in-flight during Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo, while during the Space Shuttle program, we lost two orbiters and 14 astronauts, the entire crew on both flights, of STS-51L and STS-107. Β The fact that on Orion and the SLS and related systems that the crew module can detach from the launch system should the crap hit the fan during a launch, along with the fact there will no longer be any vulnerable, fragile wings to be damaged by launch debris means the Crew Module on-top-of-launch-vehicle system is inherently SIMPLER and therefore SAFER.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nevacrest In reply to Patriot1776 [2015-09-15 00:50:49 +0000 UTC]

What I meant was that ordinary people will never be able to ride in capsule designs, due to the high g forces both on the way up, and on the way down during re-entry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 In reply to Patriot1776 [2015-03-21 05:05:54 +0000 UTC]

It sure is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0