HOME | DD

wwwarea — Animation Styles of Anthropomorphic Creatures

#alpha #animation #anthropomorphic #dogs #go #heaven #humphrey #kate #king #lion #movie #movies #omega #simba #style #all #anthropomorphism
Published: 2014-12-03 05:24:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 11113; Favourites: 73; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description


UPDATE

Please read before commenting.
Going here, here, and here is a big suggestion from me.

I also know the two characters on the left now. You don't have to tell me anymore.
And at 12/5/2014, I just updated the file to have there names now.

UPDATE DONE


DISCLAIMER - Fair Use
I believe (Not too sure) that this is not intended to infringe copyright!
The purposes of this upload is for Criticism or Commentary, and Education. Might have other purposes.

I DO NOT ASK FOR ANY COURT CHALLENGES. IF DA ISN'T SURE IF THIS IS FAIR USE AND PLANNED TO ASK ME FOR SOME COURT THING, THEN I SUGGEST JUST DELETING THIS OR TELLING ME TO DELETE THIS INSTEAD. I CANNOT HANDLE A COURT THING AND I DO NOT WANT TO.
_____________________________________

Based off a similar respectful thing .

For educational purposes I think.

Another reason this time is similar. However, here is something I am not sure about: A person claimed that the movie Alpha and Omega was received badly was because of the animation style. The anthropomorphism/personification (Which is also who they are - the wolves from the movie).
It's claim based off no proof attached, and this is what I'm very worried about with wondering if the company and it's sequels are actually avoiding the personification styles. It would NOT be a good sign for that to happen as doing that takes away many personality and the worse part is that it changes WHO THEY ARE to something there NOT. So for anyone who knows well about the negativity, I want to know if this is true. - I believe it's bias either way, but I really want to know this anyway for my own reasons. EDIT: Actually PLEASE PM ME or COMMENT somewhere else if you want to send me a notice. Sadly I disabled the comments on here for now.
EDIT DONE.
I've also asked on a really bad forum and didn't recieve any evidence to that claim.

I also believe that person who claimed that is (or was, not sure now) bias.. Person defends other styles but selfishly attacks another.

____________________________________

Now, like before, I like to teach that anthropomorphism is something that's been used before many times. The reason why it's used a lot is because it adds personality to each character. The major problem with the idea of forcing them to act "real" would mean that they would have less personality.
Look at this.
This is a study based off experience and theory. I can honestly and safety say that if we take fantasy out, it would ruin the identity of many things.

What is anthropomorphism?
"the attribution of human characteristics or behavior to a god, animal, or object."en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropo…
Take a look at the Modern Literature section.

Style

The movie Alpha and Omega has what many other movies has.
It's NOT A FLAW, it's a style of the animation and it's not even anything new.
Even if it was new, that doesn't make it bad.

Why do I Keep Talking About This Part?
I honestly hope certain people read this, but the reason why I care so much about this is because it was there identity. They are anthropomorphic wolves, not wolves.
In other words: When they do stuff like: Stand and dance, point like human fingers, and many other human expressions, etc, it's a reflection of who they are.

Whenever I say 'anthropomorphic wolves' (like the earlier one where I defend the art style), I usually meant what they do. Whenever they do personification things, it shows who they are more. I wasn't simply talking about the art style only (Like there faces), I was mainly talking about there souls of what causes them to do things like human characteristics. In fact, I'm not even sure if there human-like faces expressions is 'human characteristic' too, but either way. I am mainly talking about both, especially the expressions of them.

Another reason might be what I said before: Fear and worry about if that criticism really existed and fear involving the company.
Let's hope to God that the company isn't actually avoiding the fantasy spirit of the movie because honestly, the fantasy/anthro/whatever is something very enjoyable by many and it's a style, not a flaw.

________________________

*Unknown: I sadly never grew up with the movie (All Dogs Go to Heaven ) for what I remember.

Anyway, some credits:
Top left picture: All Dogs Go to Heaven
Top middle picture: Alpha and Omega
Top Right picture: The Lion King

I do not claim copyright on the copyrighted pictures themselves.

Related content
Comments: 66

KashimusPrime In reply to ??? [2014-12-05 03:46:30 +0000 UTC]

I also gave you the reason why it's bashed to which you flipped your shit over. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to KashimusPrime [2014-12-05 04:00:38 +0000 UTC]

No, you acted like there opinions were fact and you actually used yours as a fact against me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KashimusPrime In reply to wwwarea [2014-12-05 04:01:40 +0000 UTC]

I may have worded it wrong, but the film(s) are bashed because of those reasons I listed simply because of what I have heard around me. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KashimusPrime In reply to ??? [2014-12-05 03:45:20 +0000 UTC]

First of all, I'm not a moron, secondly, that was traced off of a screenshot from the movie. It's called a traced base. Please, stay out of politics. You wouldn't make it as a lawyer with your argument. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to KashimusPrime [2014-12-05 04:00:12 +0000 UTC]

Your a moron for pretending your personal dislike is a "fact" or thinking it's the same as simply "not liking a movie".
Also, it's a line-art, and it's still rude either way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MidnightCrystalUmi In reply to ??? [2014-12-05 03:44:13 +0000 UTC]

i want to correct you . the user is a 'she' 

from the looks of it you threw a paddy because someone does not like the film. 
: this is a public site. 
it seems many forget that in meaning . she had every right to comment if she wanted to. 

you post something in public expect others to post back to it. think before starting to point the gun.  

And i have no full clue here. but it does not help throwing a  tantrum at some user who is sharing their opinion . i barley point out flaws in films like that as it would end up dragging but i won't stop others from sharing how they feel about something.

we are our own person and we are allowed to think different. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to MidnightCrystalUmi [2014-12-05 03:59:16 +0000 UTC]

No I didn't "threw a paddy" because someone didn't like the film.
I "threw a paddy" when someone acted as if there personal opinion was "fact" over a critique attempt or claim.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KashimusPrime In reply to ??? [2014-12-05 03:19:50 +0000 UTC]

Is bigot your favorite word? Because you seem to throw that at me a lot just because you don't like my opinions. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to KashimusPrime [2014-12-05 03:36:37 +0000 UTC]

Yes it is, well not really.
Do you even understand what an opinion is? When you claim an opinion, it's arguable. This is something I've sent before:

"So if you brought out someone else, a media piece (Like if you claim something to the public of that), a report claim, a term, and other global things, then stuff like 'proof', 'research', 'understanding', 'maybe morals', etc, etc would be required. That is why I argued your opinions on certain things."When you go out and make claims based off personal opinion (e.g. Calling this movie bad as if that's a fact to the world) then that's arguable.

Welcome to the debate system where "It's my opinionz" isn't an excuse to be fucking rude and bigoted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MidnightCrystalUmi In reply to wwwarea [2014-12-05 03:54:49 +0000 UTC]

explain how she was 'bigoted' i don't see that having any thing to do with them sharing their opinion . i share mine to you but yet you yell at her for her sharing opinion on a film. 

: the film was poorly animated . it had bad flaws and half a bad plot line. 

I don't bother half the time with films animated like that. it's like with sonic 06 . half the plot line was good and the animation was good but it could of been better.
You have to understand that the user was only saying their opinion . spouting shit at them does not help. you really should calm down for a second and think before you type.


Just because someone does not like something does not mean someone should get so protective over it and spout immature words towards someone. 
I don't want to sound or be a butt here. i am tired of seeing kids throw a table over something that was not needed. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KashimusPrime In reply to wwwarea [2014-12-05 03:53:13 +0000 UTC]

I'm not 3 years old. I am well educated on what an opinion is. You asked why it wasn't well received, I gave you the reasons to which you promptly flipped your shit over and cried like a toddler having a temper tantrum. 

Friends around me and people I follow all laughed about how bad this movie was. Many of those folks were animation students or various other art media students. 

Again with the word bigot. You seem throw that word around when you don't seem to understand the definition of it. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZwolfieLove [2014-12-03 21:43:45 +0000 UTC]

Itchy and Charlie are in the 1st Panel and Humphrey and Katei in the 2nd and 3rd is Simba =3

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to ZwolfieLove [2014-12-03 22:32:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks I know the first one now thanks to another user.
By the way, the name is 'Kate', not 'Katie' as I heard a lot, unless maybe the name was that way in another country? xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZwolfieLove In reply to wwwarea [2014-12-03 22:42:20 +0000 UTC]

i forgot how to spell it i mean Kate XD but forgot been awhile since i saw it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to ZwolfieLove [2014-12-04 03:36:33 +0000 UTC]

Ah alright. Haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kurayami-prince In reply to ??? [2014-12-03 05:37:39 +0000 UTC]

if you want the names for the first two characters :3
the one on the left is itchy and the one on the right is charlie from all dogs go to heaven

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to Kurayami-prince [2014-12-03 21:34:17 +0000 UTC]

Haha thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |