HOME | DD

#alien #blue #cloud #cloudscape #glowing #jellyfish #nebula #orange #ring #star
Published: 2018-02-05 23:43:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 17143; Favourites: 436; Downloads: 322
Redirect to original
Description
These are just the first three. We call them "stellamedusa".Many more will come in the next days and will patiently travel the imense distance to the blue star.
During their very long journey the eggs inside will mature and, as they near the star, their bodies will explode with the heat. This will disperse their eggs in all directions. Most of these eggs will burn in the intense heat, some will directly hit the star or will be captured in an orbit around it, but a few will eventually escape and arrive to some other planet, in this or in another system, where the sequence will begin once more.
A fascinating element to this cycle is that the radiation from the star will alter the DNA of some of the eggs, creating a countless number of mutations. Some will fail, others will prevail.
In the meantime, the remains of the dead stellamedusa will forever orbit the star, creating an ethereal cloud-like shape around it, an eternal reminder of this fascinating cycle of life and death.
This was the first real example we found of actual panspermia in our voyages across the galaxy.
In the meantime, we are also witness to another cycle: the debris around the star are either the remains of old planets that for some reason were desintegrated, or the start of future planets that will eventually be formed. Or both simultaneously. Again, it's hard to say where the cycle starts or where it ends.
--------------------------
This image has two companions, with two different women, here:
Β
Those of you who follow my work know that I like to add a human element to my images. There are several reasons for that, some practical, some conceptual. In practical terms, a human is a great and easy way to provide a sense of scale. For the more "fantastic" images, it also brings a sense of familiarity to the viewer, allowing an easier "acceptance" of what otherwise could be a too strange environment. It also provides a gateway, by giving the viewer a perspective ("what would I see if I were that person?"). From a compositional perspective, the place where the human is looking at is a natural guide to the eyes of the viewer. Conceptually, it helps to tell a story (or build it completely).
In this particular image, I couldn't decide whether or not to place a human element. My original concept was without one. Then I felt it needed one and I added a human and several buildings. Then I didn't like it and removed it. And back again. And again. Always changing this and that in the meantime.
In the end, I gave up and decided instead to post both images. Let's see which one you prefer.
Of course, I had to change some compositional elements between the two images. The presence of the human is a strong natural focus, especially on that place (the exact horizontal 1/3) that needs a compositional counterpart, preferably in a diagonal, so I raised the position of the entity, the "stellamedusa", on the right. In the image without the human I couldn't have the entity as high also especially because it created a too obvious parallel compositional focus with the sun.
The absence of the human also brought the need to redistribute the visual "weight" of the elements, so I brought the central entity more to the left and the left entity more to the right (in fact, the left entity now almost exactly occupies the 1/3 position left free when I removed the human).
As always, this image was rendered in Vue in a 3D virtual world that I created, without photo-manipulation.
Related content
Comments: 39
MidnightSprint [2018-02-25 01:15:08 +0000 UTC]
Holy moly! I really love all of your work. Everything is always so scenic and brings out a real feeling of fantasy, otherworldliness, and awe. Beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to MidnightSprint [2018-02-25 10:15:50 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I love those words, that's very much what I try to convey. I'm glad it resonates in you.
π: 0 β©: 0
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-25 14:46:38 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
ArthurBlue In reply to tsahel [2018-02-14 21:13:58 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I love that word.
π: 0 β©: 1
tsahel In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-15 01:44:49 +0000 UTC]
I would love to create artwork like this one.
π: 0 β©: 0
GalaxyCreations [2018-02-10 18:04:32 +0000 UTC]
Are the stellamedusa harmless?They are huge I would want to watch from a further spot compare to the other picture.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to GalaxyCreations [2018-02-11 14:43:07 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty sure they're harmless.
I tried now to make an image where you could see both the human and the medusa at the same time in parallel but it's impossible because the medusa is around 630 meters and the human is 1.8 meters (more or less average human size). It means the medusa is 350 times larger than the human. For a better understanding, if you reduced the medusa to the size of an average human, by comparison a human would be 5 mm. That's more or less the size of an ant. So, in size, a human compares to these medusa as an ant compares to a human...
π: 0 β©: 0
SmoothDonatello1138 [2018-02-08 16:45:11 +0000 UTC]
Personally, I love seeing these fantastical environments without humans. It's cool to see something completely alien. This place doesn't really look like a place humans belong.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to SmoothDonatello1138 [2018-02-08 20:48:39 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for sharing. I understand your view.
π: 0 β©: 0
Chanteur-de-Vent [2018-02-07 18:04:49 +0000 UTC]
Somehow it looks like it symbolizes souls searching for truth. Rising above the everyday life, above the clouds of confusion, they seek the clear sky, looking for something meaningful in their life.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Chanteur-de-Vent [2018-02-07 20:12:47 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I sent you a private note.
π: 0 β©: 0
default-cube [2018-02-07 02:28:20 +0000 UTC]
Have you seen any of the βGalactic Geographicβ series of illustrations by Karl Kofoed? This one reminds me of him.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to default-cube [2018-02-07 20:04:42 +0000 UTC]
No, I hadn't seen it but googled it now and, wow, that's amazing. Thanks for sharing!
π: 0 β©: 0
ArthurBlue In reply to ThierryCravatte [2018-02-06 21:53:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, my friend.
π: 0 β©: 1
ThierryCravatte In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-06 22:05:19 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome !
π: 0 β©: 0
jepegraphics [2018-02-06 00:29:52 +0000 UTC]
I like this a lot better, it works, even without the human element - the "scale" is majestic. The (naked) female in the other image is a bit distracting and also a little ridiculous, IMO.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to jepegraphics [2018-02-06 01:33:17 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, especially for your honest remark. I'm really intrigued with your opinion and would like to explore it a bit, if you don't mind. My females are loosely inspired by the works of Benedict Campbell, like this one: www.benedict1.com/digitalartisβ¦ or this i.pinimg.com/originals/6f/18/cβ¦
There are many other artists, from past and present, who depict sci-fi women in skin-tight outfits. I grew up influenced by this kind of art so I may have lost objectivity. Would you please tell me why you find her ridiculous?
(In the meantime, I'm already working on a new version, with a different outfit ).
π: 0 β©: 1
jepegraphics In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-06 06:25:39 +0000 UTC]
Well, I didn't want to give critique of any kind, I only expressed my opinion. I totally would see both kind of women you took as a reference in your image, because the outfits show technology and reflection. But I see you already changed her, so no comment necessary.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to jepegraphics [2018-02-06 21:41:23 +0000 UTC]
It's quite alright, I'm not complaining. I've been making images for a long time and I much prefer more when people express "negative" opinions than positive ones because it's the negative ones that make me grow, change and adapt. I wish more people did like you and openly speak their minds, even about details. Then I'd know what to change.
I quite enjoyed that you expressed your opinion, I really, really liked it because it made me see the scene with another perspective. I'm being totally honest.
Because of your comment, I actually think the image is now better. So, thank you.
Please continue being honest and open about my images as much as you can. Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 1
jepegraphics In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-06 22:24:22 +0000 UTC]
Well, thanks, I'm glad you think so. I still like this one the most though, even with your recent changes. Unless - what if you connect both images, with the second image (with the human element) being a few thousand years after the first. - But then it's maybe not enough to change the woman only.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to jepegraphics [2018-02-07 20:43:30 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. Yes, I thought about emulating passage of time (I did that "trick" with some other pair of images, a long time ago, can't remember which ones now). But I gave up, it was too much work because I had to think about the evolution of the sun with all that time (and remake it), the evolution of the rings, create a new cloudscape, ... Too much work.
π: 0 β©: 1
jepegraphics In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 21:01:12 +0000 UTC]
Hehe, yes, imagined that already - it would maybe need a completely new scene.Β
π: 0 β©: 0