HOME | DD

#alien #blue #cloud #cloudscape #colony #girl #glowing #jellyfish #nebula #orange #ring #space #star #woman
Published: 2018-02-05 23:45:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 43346; Favourites: 1005; Downloads: 555
Redirect to original
Description
These are just the first three. We call them "stellamedusa".Many more will come in the next days and will patiently travel the imense distance to the blue star.
During their very long journey the eggs inside will mature and, as they near the star, their bodies will explode with the heat. This will disperse their eggs in all directions. Most of these eggs will burn in the intense heat, some will directly hit the star or will be captured in an orbit around it, but a few will eventually escape and arrive to some other planet, in this or in another system, where the sequence will begin once more.
A fascinating element to this cycle is that the radiation from the star will alter the DNA of some of the eggs, creating a countless number of mutations. Some will fail, others will prevail.
In the meantime, the remains of the dead stellamedusa will forever orbit the star, creating an ethereal cloud-like shape around it, an eternal reminder of this fascinating cycle of life and death.
This was the first real example we found of actual panspermia in our voyages across the galaxy.
In the meantime, we are also witness to another cycle: the debris around the star are either the remains of old planets that for some reason were desintegrated, or the start of future planets that will eventually be formed. Or both simultaneously. Again, it's hard to say where the cycle starts or where it ends.
--------------------------
Note: this image is for sale as NFT at knownorigin.io/gallery/8575000β¦
-------------------------
This image has a "humanless" companion, here:
Those of you who follow my work know that I like to add a human element to my images. There are several reasons for that, some practical, some conceptual. In practical terms, a human is a great and easy way to provide a sense of scale. For the more "fantastic" images, it also brings a sense of familiarity to the viewer, allowing an easier "acceptance" of what otherwise could be a too strange environment. It also provides a gateway, by giving the viewer a perspective ("what would I see if I were that person?"). From a compositional perspective, the place where the human is looking at is a natural guide to the eyes of the viewer. Conceptually, it helps to tell a story (or build it completely).
In this particular image, I couldn't decide whether or not to place a human element. My original concept was without one. Then I felt it needed one and I added a human and several buildings. Then I didn't like it and removed it. And back again. And again. Always changing this and that in the meantime.
In the end, I gave up and decided instead to post both images. Let's see which one you prefer.
Of course, I had to change some compositional elements between the two images. The presence of the human is a strong natural focus, especially on that place (the exact horizontal 1/3) that needs a compositional counterpart, preferably in a diagonal, so I raised the position of the entity, the "stellamedusa", on the right. In the image without the human I couldn't have the entity as high also especially because it created a too obvious parallel compositional focus with the sun.
The absence of the human also brought the need to redistribute the visual "weight" of the elements, so I brought the central entity more to the left and the left entity more to the right (in fact, the left entity now almost exactly occupies the 1/3 position left free when I removed the human).
As always, this image was rendered in Vue in a 3D virtual world that I created, without photo-manipulation.
EDIT: after two comments in the same direction regarding the woman, I changed her. You can see the previous version in my scraps folder, here:
EDIT: in case you're curious, I originally thought of a different human construct for this world, not those buildings, but I couldn't make it work, compositionally. This is the spaceship I imagined (you can click it).
Related content
Comments: 63
ArthurBlue In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2018-02-23 23:06:22 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, I'm glad you like it.
π: 0 β©: 1
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-25 14:46:34 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
FeatherQuilt1988 [2018-02-19 13:53:15 +0000 UTC]
I think I prefer this one, though both are beautiful! I really do like the "human element" in a lot of your pictures, probably for that very reason you mentioned, it gives a sense of scale... and "bringing the viewer into the scene," that too, making it feel like people really could walk and be there.
π: 0 β©: 1
FeatherQuilt1988 In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-03-05 12:24:20 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
tomolok110 [2018-02-11 15:58:42 +0000 UTC]
Amazing, Visionary!!! Thanks for sharing! -)
π: 0 β©: 1
SatoshiII [2018-02-09 05:25:05 +0000 UTC]
This looks really good!Β Love the concept, and I always enjoy a picture that comes with a story.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to SatoshiII [2018-02-10 17:44:53 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Lately I've been trying to do that with my images (either that or a poem), to contextualize the viewer about what goes on in my mind when I'm doing it.
π: 0 β©: 0
ArthurBlue In reply to Nategold0410 [2018-02-08 20:51:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, I'm glad you like the combination. Lately I've been telling little stories to go with my images, I think it lends them an extra dimension.
π: 0 β©: 0
TimTaller [2018-02-08 13:09:43 +0000 UTC]
Hi, I made a small animated GIF based on your awesome work.
Hope you like it
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to TimTaller [2018-02-08 20:46:57 +0000 UTC]
That is really fantastic and very well done. I loved it! You gave life to this world.
Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 0
Ivladislaw [2018-02-08 12:06:28 +0000 UTC]
I remember some comments about my works a few years ago when I posted it on social media. People asked me, "Where are characters?"
Your work got not only a personage but a new sense in my view. I see the buildings above the clouds in this work and think that nature and creations of people have a tendency to become similar.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Ivladislaw [2018-02-08 21:01:51 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
You know, tt's really interesting that you said "nature and creations of people have a tendency to become similar" because that was precisely my original idea. I wanted to make the human constructs as similar as possible to medusae, but just artificial. So, I originally made this spaceship (you can click it, I posted it in my scraps with a description of why I gave that up).
π: 0 β©: 0
Linwelly [2018-02-07 19:08:30 +0000 UTC]
Especially with the narative you have there I thinkt the human element makes more of a whole thing out of it.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Linwelly [2018-02-07 20:14:39 +0000 UTC]
Thanks.
Yes, I agree. The majority of people seem to agree too. Until now, this one has 355 favorites and the other one has 155. I expected a slight difference between the two versions but not at this scale. Very interesting.
π: 0 β©: 1
Linwelly In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 20:20:30 +0000 UTC]
That is quite the difference, interesting, I wouldn't have expected it to be so much.
At some point I really would like to see all your beautiful off world works come together in a story
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Linwelly [2018-02-07 20:44:29 +0000 UTC]
That would be a great idea.
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 1
Linwelly In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 21:46:48 +0000 UTC]
So I can hope for that? Welcome
π: 0 β©: 0
Fulcrumb [2018-02-07 04:23:51 +0000 UTC]
Looks both fantastic and breathtaking! I prefer this version if only because having a human element lends a sense of scale to the medusae. To that end I think maybe it would've looked cooler if the jellyfish on the right side was even closer to the camera, so we can further see just how enormous it is. If it were animated I'd suggest having one drift right past the window, but alas.
Amazing job!
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Fulcrumb [2018-02-07 20:12:09 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
Yes, you are right, I should have thought of a better way to show the true scale of the medusae. It's hard to show it exactly because there aren't many reference points in a cloudscape. Anyway, since this is a 3D virtual world, all objects have a real world size. In meters, the woman is 1.8m tall (more or less average height for a human) and each medusa is 628m tall... Just its "head" is 76m tall. The distance between the woman and the medusae on the right is 1.2Km...
π: 0 β©: 0
ThierryCravatte [2018-02-06 22:04:23 +0000 UTC]
I prefer this version. The human character adds signification to the scene.
π: 0 β©: 1
ThierryCravatte In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 21:11:53 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure,really.
π: 0 β©: 0
TJANGEL20202 In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-06 21:54:18 +0000 UTC]
your so very welcome. keep up the amazing art
π: 0 β©: 0
YukiAnneArt [2018-02-06 18:34:16 +0000 UTC]
This is amazing!! *o* love those colors <3Β
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to YukiAnneArt [2018-02-06 21:50:25 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I like the contrast of orange and blue a lot, I've used it many times in my images.
π: 0 β©: 1
YukiAnneArt In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 13:02:14 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome I like that tooo <3Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Xerxan [2018-02-06 06:48:58 +0000 UTC]
great work
makes me think of Goodbye Milky Way by Enigma
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to Xerxan [2018-02-06 21:53:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I see what you mean.
π: 0 β©: 0
uxmal750ad [2018-02-06 04:02:06 +0000 UTC]
A great scene. Β The Stellamedusa reminds me of Carl Sagan's "Floaters" from his Cosmos series. Β As for the character, I like both actually. Β With her in the scene it, as you said, adds a human touch. Β Without the character I almost feel like I'm flying over the cloud tops. Β The second iteration of the woman is better. Β I like her stance and outfit much more...
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to uxmal750ad [2018-02-06 21:52:22 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
Yes, the Stellamedusa was very much inspired in the "Floaters" concept. I avidly saw Carl Sagan's shows when I was young.
π: 0 β©: 1
uxmal750ad In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-07 03:19:41 +0000 UTC]
I sill watch the older ones with Sagan once in awhile.Β As good as Neil Degrasse Tyson is, I think even he would admit that Carl had something special about him.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArthurBlue In reply to uxmal750ad [2018-02-07 20:26:09 +0000 UTC]
Carl Sagan had a more "poetic" way of talking about things. Neil D. Tyson is great but tries to use a language that is more accessible to the masses, with too much "comic relief" in his speech. I preferred it serious, like Carl Sagan. There's times for being serious, there's time for jokes. Those topics are not meant for jokes, in my humble opinion. Jokes will reach the masses more easily but I prefer he'd toned it down a notch.
Anyway, I can't make up my mind between Neil Degrasse Tyson and Lawrence Krauss, they're both fantastic.
π: 0 β©: 0
CrystalWyvern123 In reply to ArthurBlue [2018-02-06 23:13:58 +0000 UTC]
I loved the piece. It was awesome. Lol, probably should have said that first and foremost XDD
π: 0 β©: 0
garageguy [2018-02-06 01:20:40 +0000 UTC]
Could go without the bluebottomed Barbie, but otherwise lovely!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>