HOME | DD
ChikitaWolf β IT'S THEIR FAULT!1!!11
Published: 2012-02-29 22:42:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 8445; Favourites: 401; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description
LazystampislazyOTLI'm sure those of you who have dived into the muck of debate and flaming have seen it.
I'd love to add stamps in here as examples, but the anti-religion stamps far outweighed the anti-atheism stamps (from what I could find), and I gave up x'D
As a Christian myself (I'd like to think I'd be considered a "sane" one, lmao), I've been called a lot of nasty things and gotten more than my fair share of vulgar comments. But goodness, I've seen atheists (or anyone not entirely religious for that matter) get ripped apart just as bad, if not worse.
Recently, however, I've noticed that people are starting a ridiculous crying out that "[Athiests / Religious folk] are the haters!!", "There's only hate on the [Atheist / Religion] side!!", etc.
. . . wut?
tl;dr: There's hate on both sides, people. It's not just one side's fault.
Anyway, !DoItForTheLulz says it best in regards to the extremism on both sides.
I wish Christians would come up with a new nameSeriously, I wish you good Christians--the ones of value and true faith--would devise a way to call yourselves something different so that we can identify you from the morons. I mean, really. Most of you people are like anyone else, but you have morons who spout stupid shit that just makes your religion look like a brain washing factory of retardation.
I wish branding was still legal. Then we could just mark fucktards on the forehead with giant "F"s.
For "fucktard".
Edit: Now that I have your attention,
This applies to everyone. It just so happens that "Christian" is a really good topic word for people to look.
I aim this mostly at Chris
EDIT: I'd really appreciate it if people didn't attempt "turning" others away from their beliefs or lack thereof. Everyone has a right to believe in what they want - there's no need for you to start leeching onto people's comments and telling them they're messed up or wrong, etc, etc.
If I keep finding this going on, I'm going to disable comments.
Healthy conversation is encouraged, however
EDIT2: Need examples of what I'm talking about in this stamp? I suggest reading through the comments ;D *ahem*Page 6
EDIT3: Featured~! 
Related content
Comments: 458
Looking back on it, I'd rather not point people to the sixth page anyway, cuz holy shiznits were brains melted in the ludicrousy of it all xD
Hnnn, on the bright side, at least we still have some people who use their brains lmao. Lots of crazies, yes; but the people I've met in college have given me some hope 8'D
π: 0 β©: 0
Atheists can be just as obnoxious as religious people.
π: 0 β©: 0
I've never been bashed for having a belief in God thankfully, but it upsets me to hear people being bashed for having or not having a belief 
π: 0 β©: 3
sadly that will not happen my dear but its a good dream
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed it is. Hopefully someday people realize how foolish they sound when they bash ones religion.
π: 0 β©: 1
no most humans are to stubborn to idmit Β there wrong
π: 0 β©: 1
That's also true..sadly I know people like that =.=
π: 0 β©: 1
If you were an atheist you wouldn't even need to discuss, you would be bashed by simple titles, quotes, signatures.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh yeah. I know for a fact if I was atheist, I'd be mocked, ridiculed, etc worse then what someone gets for being christian. I think people are free to believe in whatever they want and shouldn't be bashed, for what they believe or don't believe in.
π: 1 β©: 0
Sadly, that probably isn't going to happen
π: 0 β©: 1
Unfortunately not 
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, it's not good.
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed it isn't *sighs* People these days huh?
π: 0 β©: 1
It especially annoys me when people bash others for things that they do themselves.
π: 0 β©: 2
Ugh that's another pet peeve of mine! I think I know what you mean: Like if a person wants respect for their beliefs but goes around bashing people who don't agree with their beliefs?
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant.
The main one I run into though is something like this, an atheist accusing a christian of using the same arguments that all other christians use, or vis-versa, but they themselves are doing exactly the same thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's true. I mean, sometimes atheists use arguements from other atheists so who are they to judge christians who do that?
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, of course it goes the other way too. But that particular one I've seen more with atheists.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah you are right definitely. You know some atheists were upset (more like furious) at the cross placed on Ground Zero? -__-
π: 0 β©: 1
Really? I don't see why they should be, it doesn't really effect them.
π: 0 β©: 1
My thoughts exactly. I think they were just looking for things to purposely get them angry. I know not everyone who died on 9/11 was a Christian, but the cross was just a symbol of peace in my opinion or something; it was just a nice thing to put on there.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, it's not really much to get angry about.
π: 0 β©: 0
Ugh that's another pet peeve of mine! I think I know what you mean: Like if a person wants respect for their beliefs but goes around bashing people who don't agree with their beliefs?
π: 0 β©: 0
Hate doesn't matter. There's hate between different fandoms, or different scientific specializations.
Β
Relax, religions are only being subject to rationality, science and democracy. You know, survival of the fittest, another thing religion doesn't know.
π: 0 β©: 3
I personally consider atheists another religious group, and there is no reason that they shouldn't be. There is almost no beliefs in any religions that actually go against scientific discoveries.
π: 0 β©: 1
Absence of religion isn't a kind of religion, because religion is the opinion that there's something supernatural. Saying that there's nothing supernatural isn't a way to say there's something supernatural. And almost every single belief in religions is against scientific discoveries.
π: 0 β©: 1
"religion is the opinion that there's something supernatural"
No, it isn't.
dictionary.reference.com/browsβ¦
Atheism applies to meanings 1, 2 and 3. You have been logically destroyed by everybody that has had a debate with you in these comments, just give up.
π: 0 β©: 1
I've been opposed in these comments, never proven wrong. Everybody that has had a debate with me in these comments is logically idiot including you, no one presented decent arguments. So that makes you funny. And you're already trolling at the first reply?
Β
Your own definition of religion, even if it's partial, (andΒ the one you quote isn't the only one) states the same thing I said, superhuman, supernatural elements, and practices.
Β
Logic contradicts all of your bullshit so far. Keep trying, in a thousand years you could make (by chance, not by thinking about it) a correct statement.
π: 0 β©: 1
Did you even read the definitions? Let's take number two for instance (a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects) anybody literate can tell you what the means, and none of their explanations will include the word 'supernatural'.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're grasping at straws, whatΒ are you trying to say, that religions aren't beliefs in supernatural? Sure, because they're about Einstein's relativity. A series of supposed data about real arguments is not a religion, a computer doesn't have a religion, political views are not religions, suppositions are not religions, stubborn opinions are not religions. You know it already.
π: 0 β©: 1
I didn't say they weren't I just said that your definition is completely incorrect. You are the one grasping at straws.
Hey, I've got a fun game. Hows about you:
1.) Stop changing the subject every time you are beaten.
2.) Stop dodging questions.
3.) Actually post some art instead of having arguments.
π: 0 β©: 1
I was never beaten because I'm right. You are practically admitting what I said and still saying you're right? How about you go to a psychiatrich hospital? And what question did I avoid?Β The amount of not making sense and being generally wrong in your comments is above the scale. Now you're doing nothing but spam, and the discussion is already over without you realizing it, like always happens with idiots. Bye.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am glad I was not the first one to resort to insults, it proves you are trolling.
π: 0 β©: 1
You come out and say I'm beaten for being right and disagreeing with people and I'm trolling? I bring arguments, you only nonsense. Like "religions don't have beliefs against science"
π: 0 β©: 1
I thought you said that the conversation was over, but whatever.
π: 0 β©: 0
I beg to differ, but whatever ya say, mate.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
That's why Michael Shermer, the skeptic, refuses to identify as atheist.
Atheist ideals have at times not been as clean as many atheists would have you believe; one example of atheism at it's worst are the events that transpired during Mexico's La Reforma.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nice argument.Β Accuse me of terrorism while you're at it.
π: 0 β©: 1
I constantly see whyΒ skeptics wish distance themselves from "atheists".
Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Skeptics my ass. Those are philosophers. Skeptics barely discuss about it. Of course in public you can't say anything else than "there's no proof of one thing or another" instead of "religion doesn't concern science, the foolish ideas aren't suppositions brought up by signs that require investigation, they're ridiculous fantasies which have the obvious purpose of scare ignorant people of authority", which is more honest.
Β
I also see why, very clearly. Because atheism hasn't absolutely stopped being hated to death by fanatics. If you've never heard thye worst nauseatingly hateful rants against atheism, you're lucky.
Β
AndΒ instead instead of saying "I see why these are the facts", you could argument something.
π: 0 β©: 1
I thinkΒ the horseΒ just broke down
π: 0 β©: 1
You have no arguments but you still wanna sound knowledgeable, so you start trolling, hoping this saves your ass. Instead, you reveal even more your ignorance, if there were doubts before.
Β
You don't contradict what I say = you agree.
π: 0 β©: 0
That's why I'm neutral, just like my mother 
π: 0 β©: 2
Ah! So you're agonistic?
π: 0 β©: 1
yes...also this comment is 5 years old lmao?
π: 0 β©: 1
its fine lol just didnt expect a response to that now
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>