HOME | DD

daniellesylvan — Choice

Published: 2007-11-22 04:01:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 12654; Favourites: 314; Downloads: 93
Redirect to original
Description My view on abortion, my friend brought up the subject, and it inspired me to draw this.

I got some of the idea from America's Next Top Model. lol xD;; In one of their photoshoots, they did political issues, and a girl had this written on her stomach.

I used [link] as a slight ref. I changed the position a bit though.

Pro-choice all the way!

Do not use this image without my permission.
Related content
Comments: 597

Tradekeep [2019-05-07 18:10:00 +0000 UTC]

abortion is women choice, religious freaks have no right to interfere.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

dashie1430 [2018-01-09 03:25:25 +0000 UTC]

You’re right. It is your choice. But really think about the baby. Its the babies choice. It wants to live. Thats why its there. Its the babies body. Not yours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tradekeep In reply to dashie1430 [2019-05-07 18:10:26 +0000 UTC]

What baby?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dashie1430 In reply to Tradekeep [2019-05-10 18:14:14 +0000 UTC]

The one in the womans body. A new dna from it’s mother

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

AlanaBrianne21 In reply to dashie1430 [2019-08-14 21:42:54 +0000 UTC]

i am a pro choice, woman have rights to wheter keep or not keep the baby/fetus 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

starbursthekitty In reply to dashie1430 [2019-05-13 05:41:56 +0000 UTC]

You mean the fetus? That’s not a baby, the fetus doesn’t have the ability to think or feel unlike the mother.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dashie1430 In reply to starbursthekitty [2019-05-27 03:48:44 +0000 UTC]

So..lets say theres some 20 yrs of age and they get into an accident and they go into a vegetative state. Is it okay to kill him/her then? Because they cant think or feel?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

starbursthekitty In reply to dashie1430 [2019-05-28 21:42:50 +0000 UTC]

The fetus hasn’t formed into an actual living breathing and feeling infant yet. it’s different when the thing you’re talking about is a fully formed adult human with relationships and family and not a clump of cells.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dashie1430 In reply to starbursthekitty [2019-06-02 02:40:12 +0000 UTC]

But arnt they the same thing? They both cant feel, rely on some source and cant survive on its own? 🤔

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

starbursthekitty In reply to dashie1430 [2019-06-03 23:32:40 +0000 UTC]

They aren't the same thing, they're drastically different.

I'm not into arguing over this anymore, whatever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jagged--Unicorn [2017-01-23 03:09:23 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful piece, but i have to disagree. what about the baby? www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IR3fD… <-- watch this before you decide to be pro-life or pro-choice 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PrincessLuna1996 In reply to Jagged--Unicorn [2017-09-16 01:20:29 +0000 UTC]

How does a video about mice help you decide to become pro-life or pro-choice?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jagged--Unicorn In reply to PrincessLuna1996 [2017-09-18 06:53:02 +0000 UTC]

omg im sorry XD i must have entered the wrong url here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVdbg2…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZekeEugene [2016-11-10 09:37:10 +0000 UTC]

The woman in this pic: "My body is mine, it belongs to me, you can't take my body!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steph-Le-Vehellaire In reply to ZekeEugene [2017-03-22 15:49:06 +0000 UTC]

yet the eventual baby isn't her body. Therefore it doesn't belong to her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZekeEugene In reply to Steph-Le-Vehellaire [2017-03-22 22:01:44 +0000 UTC]

It only becomes a baby in the late-term. But late-term abortions only happen on three very rare occasions.

Late-term fetuses are the only actual unborn babies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

U4w31355M4ub3r3r [2016-10-20 00:04:48 +0000 UTC]

...I know this is an old piece, but... "A person's a person no matter how small"  -Doctor Seuss

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZekeEugene In reply to U4w31355M4ub3r3r [2016-11-10 14:46:48 +0000 UTC]

Doctor Seuss was actually Pro-Choice when he was alive. He and his wife even sued several Pro-Life organizations for using his quote out of context.

In that quote, the story was referring to the Whos, not embryos, zygotes, or fetuses.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steph-Le-Vehellaire In reply to ZekeEugene [2017-03-22 15:52:19 +0000 UTC]

still, his quote was right in our actual context.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZekeEugene In reply to Steph-Le-Vehellaire [2017-03-22 22:04:02 +0000 UTC]

But that was still not the correct context that he intended. He was referring to the Japanese during WWII, not zygotes, embryos, or gametes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TotallyDeviantLisa [2016-04-11 21:48:52 +0000 UTC]

I may not be fully pro choice, but this is quite a masterpiece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Starrtoon [2015-12-30 03:47:02 +0000 UTC]

this makes me really sad....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JessStars [2015-10-28 10:32:24 +0000 UTC]

Hi daniellesylvan

I work at a small publishing company called The English Experience, based in South Africa. We specialise in publishing English textbooks for high school students. We are currently working on a new resource, entitled ‘The Complete Life Orientation Resource’ and we would love to use this image in it. Please contact me if you are willing to let us use it. You can check out our website www.englishexperience.co.za if you would like to know more about us and what we do. I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Jess

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AntonioDelVaticano [2015-07-27 16:00:24 +0000 UTC]

I personally do not like abortion, it is sinful to destroy a child. But I do not wish to see others subjugated to anothers will. I may not like it, but people must make choices for themselves, and repent if they choose to do so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to AntonioDelVaticano [2016-04-01 10:17:01 +0000 UTC]

You're the sanest pro-choicer I have ever met. I say that because, you are, indeed, pro-choice. You don't need to think abortion is okay in a moral standpoint to support it. It's the realization that people have the right to do what they wish with their bodies, and that your personal belief does not equate to law.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-08-30 14:40:56 +0000 UTC]

foetuses aren't part of their mother's bodies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-08-30 20:30:01 +0000 UTC]

They are in that they require usage of the pregnant person's body in order to obtain nutrients and survive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-08-31 13:25:18 +0000 UTC]

Which is one of the reasons abortion shouldn't be an option outside of necessary circumstances.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-08-31 20:29:12 +0000 UTC]

And abortion is necessary whenever the pregnant person needs one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-09-01 17:19:58 +0000 UTC]

People that are pregnant from consensual sex and not in any danger don't need to abort and shouldn't have the option to, no matter what idiots like you think.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

r8er In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-14 14:22:49 +0000 UTC]

What do you think about women who somehow get pregnant, whether by rape or contraceptions failing, but also have Tokophobia, the intense, debilitating phobia of pregnancy and childbirth??
I don't want to argue, just see your opinion as a woman who most likely has said phobia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to r8er [2017-11-14 14:36:18 +0000 UTC]

Couldn't they get knocked out during the delivery? As for rape, I'm fine with abortion in that case.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

r8er In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-15 01:05:39 +0000 UTC]

Well, the fear isn't just limited to giving birth... it's also for the pregnancy itself, the fear of carrying a child to full term for a whole nine months, the idea that something inside of you is growing and developing. What would you suggest for that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to r8er [2017-11-15 14:30:42 +0000 UTC]

Create a machine for growing babies in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

r8er In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-16 23:45:59 +0000 UTC]

Well...
Yeah. I'm pretty sure scientists are already working on something like that, but this was supposed to be in regards to what you believe would be the proper way to go about a woman being pregnant, but also having tokophobia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to r8er [2017-11-18 14:34:47 +0000 UTC]

I guess that if the abortion's done in the first 2 months or so, it wouldn't be too bad, at least until a non-lethal alternative becomes possible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-09-01 22:46:21 +0000 UTC]

Abortion is necessary when the pregnant person deems as such, because shockingly enough, it's their body.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-09-02 13:08:29 +0000 UTC]

The fetus isn't their body.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-09-02 15:51:12 +0000 UTC]

No, but it requires usage of the pregnant person's body in order to survive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-11-02 15:17:36 +0000 UTC]

Barring rape, how did it get there in the first place? Because of something the mother chose to do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-04 23:04:47 +0000 UTC]

And? Consent isn't transferable. I can consent to a kiss but that doesn't mean consent to sex. I can consent to sex but that doesn't mean I consent by default to pregnancy. Furthermore, consent is revocable. A embryo and/or a fetus does not have the same value as a sentient human being, not morally, not ethically, and not biologically.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-11-06 14:30:54 +0000 UTC]

You're choosing to take the risk of getting pregnant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-14 13:01:33 +0000 UTC]

That...Logic is applicable to everything? Lmao. Each time I choose to walk down an alleyway when it's the later part of a dreary, December day, I run the risk of potentially being mugged. Sex is enjoyable - birth control and other forms of contraception can fail. The mere fact that a person is taking them should be proof they don't. Consent. To. Pregnancy. As they are actively preventing against it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-11-14 14:13:27 +0000 UTC]

I wish somebody would mug you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Orphically In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-11-15 11:36:57 +0000 UTC]

And that has to do with consent not being transferable, how?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-11-15 14:30:10 +0000 UTC]

Consent's irrelevant when it comes to an unborn baby's life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cosmicmoonshine [2015-05-23 12:57:35 +0000 UTC]

A right to choose what?  Women have a right to choose their college, spouse, and careers.  But should anyone have the right to choose to kill a human being for virtually any reason?  That is what it means to choose abortion. What about the child’s body and her choice? Again, make the distinction that there are two different bodies that we are talking about. I am Pro-Life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BellaRomatica [2014-08-15 19:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Every pro-lifer is one unwanted pregnancy away from being Pro-Choice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Jagged--Unicorn In reply to BellaRomatica [2017-09-18 06:57:12 +0000 UTC]

not me i would always want the child and if some rare case i was raped, i still would

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LadyLambdadelta In reply to BellaRomatica [2017-08-30 14:42:11 +0000 UTC]

You're an idiot, if I ever had an unwanted pregnancy on my hands (which would always be the case with me because I don't want kids ever), I'd give it up for adoption without a second thought.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>