HOME | DD
Published: 2010-02-04 18:06:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 61211; Favourites: 673; Downloads: 360
Redirect to original
Description
"Words To Avoid In Creative Writing"We've all heard there are some no-no words in creative writing - these are words that you want to avoid "at all costs" some people say, but do you know which they are, and why you should avoid them? Well, I didn't the first time I saw a list of "words to avoid", and not surprisingly, a lot of people who write these lists don't know why either. (I know, SHOCK! GASP! just because someone wrote a guide doesn't mean they know what they're talking about.)
So, this morning I went on a word-finding spree to find these "word lists" and find out WHY I was supposed to avoid these words - and more importantly, HOW. This guide will explain what I discovered.
WARNING: Quite often in this guide I am going to use words I say you shouldn't. Do as I say, not as I do. I address one problem at a time so as not to confuse people, so yes, some of my examples will have several mistakes in them even if I only address one of those mistakes.
-----
Words To Watch For
-----
Now, I say "words to watch for" because not all of these words are forbidden. People see them on a list of "words to avoid" and think "I guess I can't ever use them..." But that isn't necessarily true. Some of them you should avoid using as often as possible, and others, you should just cut back on. Sometimes, these words we are told to "avoid" aren't bad at all.
A really easy way to find these words in your writing is to open your story into a program (like Microsoft Word) that allows you to replace and highlight text. Simply search for the offending words and tell your program to replace them with a highlighted version so they're easy to spot. Don't panic if 80% of your page suddenly glows with highlights.
"of course" - Don't use it. No really, don't. Why? Because generally when you use "of course" it's because you're using it in place of saying "duh". Example: "Of course, that was a bad idea." That whole sentence is like shouting "DUH!" another example would be: "But of course, Sarah hadn't known what was coming." Which unfortunately, breaks fourth-wall, and is the equivalent of saying "duh, she should have known..."
Fourth wall: the imaginary wall between your audience and the narrator.. breaking fourth wall is like turning directly to your audience and addressing them.. and you generally want to avoid it at all costs.
"ly" - Why do you look for ly? Because sometimes (not always) -ly on the end of a word tells you that it's one of those dreaded -ly adverbs. -ly adverbs are used to modify another word, and are the lazy-man's descriptive device. Example: "She walked quickly". Any time you see one of these do this exercise: "to (insert -ly adverb and the word it modifies here) is to: ?" for instance: "to walk quickly is to
"ize" "tion" "sion" "ment" "ance" - Why to look out for these: words with these endings can usually be replaced by something stronger. They tend to make your writing seem weak. Example: "She came to the realization that she was no longer human." could be turned into: "She realized that she was no longer human." These are usually easy to fix. Keep in mind though that there are some exceptions. Some words (like lotion) adapted their endings from their root language (like latin) and there is no other way for you to say "lotion". Especially look out for words with these endings when they are placed between "the" and "of", it's a big no-no.
"is" "are" "was" "were" "be" "been" "being" - Be careful with sentences that contain these words, they COULD denote that your sentence is passive. (This is not always the case however). If you find one of these words in your sentence, check to make sure your sentence structure is active: Who/Does/What instead of What/Was Done/To Whom. You are not going to run into a passive sentence every time you find one of these words, but every passive sentence has them. Be especially wary of these words when they are followed by a word ending in -ed.
AMENDMENT: Clearly while writing this guide about words to watch out for/avoid, I did not bother to get into why passive sentences are bad (and was chastised for it) So let me clear this up. PASSIVE SENTENCES ARE NOT BAD. They are actually a very useful tool if you know how to use them correctly; however, passive sentences have a tendency to be difficult to understand as they are often wordy. There is a place and time to use them, but in narrative writing in particular, it is usually recommended that you avoid them if you can. The general rule that I go by is: If the passive sentence does not serve to avoid placing blame, fix story flow/pacing, or to avoid giving away a clue - then consider replacing it.
"make" "made" "involve" "involved" "provide" "provided" - Weak words. They aren't horrific, but if you can avoid using them, your writing will sound better.
"that" "just" "really" "very" "quite" "sort of" - Filler words. You can almost always avoid these, and they really don't add much to your writing. "That was just really evil, I am very disappointed, and quite appalled that you sort of cheated." How awful. Note: You cannot always avoid "that" sometimes it is needed to clarify. "That was awful." but for the others, they never need to be used.
"walk" "look" - These are very undescriptive words. There are a million other things you could do that aren't "walking" or "looking" - you could "shuffle" or "glance". Avoid these whenever possible (which should be always).
"saw" "heard" "thought" - Anytime you see these, you can probably replace them. They denote "telling" in your writing instead of "showing" Instead of saying "Katie thought Broderick was an idiot." why not say: "He is such an idiot."? as an actual thought. Instead of "She saw a bird fly overhead." why not: "A bird flew overhead."? Instead of "She heard a cat hiss." why not: "A cat hissed somewhere nearby."?
"seem/seemed" - Sometimes you have to use this - I won't lie. BUT, usually, you don't. Anytime you run across "seem" in your writing, say this to yourself: "____ cant SEEM ______, it either is, or isnt - does, or doesn't." if that doesn't make sense, then you can use it. Example: "The horse seemed to change colors." "A horse cant SEEM to change colors, it either changes colors, or doesn't." "The horse changed in color." would be correct.
"you" - You should -almost- never use "you" in narrative UNLESS it's in dialogue, or there is no other way to say the sentence. Example : "You walk down a hallway." would be very very bad - get out of 2nd person POV please, we beg of you. On the other hand, "Broderick, you are such a jerk." Katie yelled., would be appropriate. (I'm sorry Broderick.... Katie is so mean to you D
"ing" - Watch for actions that end with -ing. Now, these aren't bad, but you should avoid using too many of them. Using a lot of -ing action words makes your writing sound weak. Example: "Walking down the hall, Katie ran into a pygmy mummy. She screamed, and began running away." There are several mistakes in that, but you get the idea. This is BAD. (I'm sorry Katie.. I'd run from a pygmy mummy too.) You can't avoid using -ing action words all the time, it's impossible, but every once in awhile see if you can replace a few of them by rewording your sentence in another way. Also be aware that -ing action words generally mean that the action is happening NOW or "WHILE" something else is happening... you may want to be careful with how you use them.
"began to" "begins to""started to""started" "starts" - You get the idea. You can't always avoid these ("The car started.") But when you do use them, make sure you aren't using them to describe what someone is doing "She began to run." .. yah.. well then what happened? Did she stop running? Did she continue to run? It's better to just say "She ran." Generally, unless you're about to get interrupted in the next sentence, you don't "start to" or "begin to" anything. You just do it.
"instantly" "suddenly" - Avoid using these at all costs. Why? Look at this: "Instantly, the house was on fire." "Suddenly, the pygmy mummy ran after Katie." (I'm sorry Katie). The impression these words give is very comical: "INSTANTLY! The house was on fire! OMG!" "SUDDENLY! Gasp! The pygmy mummy ran after Katie! Oh noes!" Yah... you get the point. Find another way to say that something happened "all of the sudden" or "in an instant".
"briefly" There's nothing wrong with briefly, except that it's lazy. It is the easiest way to say that there was a short pause of some type, or that someone did something in a short amount of time. You can use it, but see if there's another way to indicate a pause without having to resort to this laziness.
"as" - This is one I abuse often. "as" does not mean: "while" or "when", so don't use it in place of them. Example: "As she walked, Katie..." While she walked, Katie...". This doesn't mean you should cut out "as" every time you see it - there are legitimate reasons to use "as". like: "as if" or "as a" when comparing things is appropriate. Just be aware of it in your writing, and make sure you're using it for the right reasons.
"like" - Like is generally a fairly weak word "She liked Broderick." isn't nearly as descriptive as "She cared for Broderick." But, "like" does have appropriate uses, such as when you are comparing two objects: "She ran like a gazelle." Ignore the fact that the sentence sucks. Just be aware of how you are using it, and if possible, replace it with something more descriptive.
"good" "bad" "nice" - More lazy words. They just aren't descriptive. When you run into these words ask yourself this question: "how good is it?" "it was EXCELLENT" Oh look, we found something to replace it with.
"went" "came" "got" "get" - More lazy words. There's almost always (99.%) a way you can replace these with something more descriptive. "She went to the store." "She drove to the store."
"then" - I saw this on a word list this morning, and I have mixed feelings about "then". I will give you this caution: Don't start sentences with "then". Example: "Then, she ran away." You can almost always drop it. "She ran away." It is useful in some situations, however. Such as: "She walked to her car, and then dug her keys out of her pocket." You can still avoid using it, even in this example by adding some more narrative, but it is still a valid use.
"moreover" - Don't use it. Ever. I know there are guides out there cautioning you never to start a sentence with "but", and you shouldn't, it's true. However, "moreover" is a very stuffy word, and isn't commonly used - if you wouldn't say it in real life, don't write it.
"however" - I read somewhere this morning that you shouldn't use "however", I've also seen guides that say you should use it in place of "but" since you shouldn't ever start sentences with "but". I don't know who's right, or who's wrong, but I can offer you this as my personal opinion: I use however. I say it in real life, so I write with it.. In my opinion, it is acceptable to use "however", as long as you don't -overuse it-. If you have a sentence that starts with "But," and you seem to be using "however" a lot.. consider incorporating your "But," sentence into the previous sentence. ", but she didn't..." OR, use a comma & "though" to replace it:
"She didn't like dogs. However, she found herself smiling at this one."
"Though she didn't like dogs, she found herself smiling at this one."
Obviously, it -is- avoidable, but I still hold my position that it isn't a bad word.
"alot" "alright" - These aren't actually words. What you mean is "a lot" and "all right". TWO WORDS We English-speakers are lazy slang users.
-----
I will restate this again, because I promise you, it will be forgotten: AVOID DOES NOT MEAN "YOU CAN NEVER USE THIS!" It means be aware of when you are using it, and make sure you're using it in a correct way. Don't let people tell you "you should never use this word: ______" Maybe you shouldn't use it, but that doesn't mean you can't use it..
Related content
Comments: 168
GreenCauldron08 [2016-06-23 19:03:10 +0000 UTC]
Hey, thanks for doing this! I'm going to write two huge English exams this week, and you've got a lot of insightful advice on good writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sadmac356 [2014-12-12 22:52:16 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! The way one of my past English teachers taught that, I thought I could never use any of them, which kind of killed my interest in writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Eve-of-WinterStar [2014-12-06 14:55:47 +0000 UTC]
so many new insights for me to incorperate!
thanks for sharing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
definitelynotangie [2014-10-26 05:19:11 +0000 UTC]
thankyou for creating this! It's very useful I'll remeber these tips in my writing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KingPharoah [2014-09-18 19:48:45 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, it was helpful. (I know you wrote this and your other tuts a while ago, so forgive me). I found that most of this applies to narrative, especially third person limited. I mostly use first person, and in that sense, the character may have thoughts that break many of these rules, because there are no rules to thoughts. Just thought I'd add. Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MicTheMadMan [2014-07-27 05:44:15 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much for this, it's very helpful for me!
Though I do have one question I'm stuck on.
I'm currently writing a series that involves tons upon tons of action scenes. I find myself getting stuck saying "and then (he/it)", "he then", "after that, he" so many times when it comes to a character starting one attack and then another right after. Is this a bad thing?
I want the readers to understand that these characters are not your average 5th grade bullies wanting to steal your lunch money, these are powerful beings with superpowers that defy all realism in the human world, and that they see that these characters are moving so quick in their movements, that I give them a course of action, then transfer to a next move instantly.
Do you have any advice on what I could say that might make the fight scenes work better?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jotokai [2014-07-04 21:53:22 +0000 UTC]
I've done wonders by using rules like this. Cutting out the word "just" was my first. Emboldened by the fact that it almost always worked, I followed up by attacking the forms of 'to be.' (Even when it's not passive voice, the result is either much more vibrant, or awkward. And the latter, usually comes from laziness => Even active 'to be' sentences take on increased vitality when built around better verbs, if I take the time to find the correct foundation of subject and action.) Maybe passive voice is useful in narrative, but not often.
Couple I feel different about, but that's to be expected.
In order to fully fathom a rule, I follow it. This worked in pre-algebra, and it works in creative writing. There's no harm, so long as I remember to save my original somewhere. Usually, the new trick works in several situations, yet ruins things in others. Often, I'm quite pleased with the results!
What you have is an excellent piece of scholarship. I'm not surprised, given the person that linked to your piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmperorGothon [2013-10-03 14:07:43 +0000 UTC]
As a writer myself, I found this article very useful. Myself personally, I tend to use the word "almost" a lot, which tends to destroy a lot of my sentences. I will certainly use this as a guide when I come to writing my next book! Cheers for a great post
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to EmperorGothon [2013-10-03 16:09:13 +0000 UTC]
thank you, i'm glad you found it helpful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dainas-Fantasy [2013-10-01 20:16:44 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for this helpful tutorial! I understand it is a guide and not written in stone. I really need advice like this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crissi [2013-09-30 14:42:25 +0000 UTC]
I'm curious about using your rule for the word "as". In my Thesaurus, it defines "as" like this:
Part of Speech: conjunction
Definition: while, when
Synonyms: at the time that, during the time that, in the act of, in the process of, just as, on the point of
Notes: use 'like' when no verb follows; use 'as' when a clause follows (which has a subject and a verb)
It seems that "as" can be used instead of "while" - though doing a quick search of all my "as" sentences helped me to strengthen those sentences anyway. All in all, I find this guide to be incredibly helpful as I edit my novel. Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nattynatster [2013-07-23 19:55:14 +0000 UTC]
Very useful guide- like *914four says: it's good to be more aware of these potentially problematic words. Thanks a lot I'd already looked at some of these words in my manuscript...but now I'll go back and do another 'Find' on Word and see if I can improve my story further.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
914four [2013-07-11 20:28:06 +0000 UTC]
I like this, I like this a lot, not necessarily because I'm ever going to cease using all the words it discusses, but rather because it points them out to me so that I am more aware of them. When I was writing the first book of "The Kentauride," I asked a friend who has a small publishing house her opinion of my draft manuscript. She flipped through it, possibly read the first five or six pages (of over two hundred at that point), handed it back to me and said "Don't use the word 'but'." I was a little shocked, maybe a little hurt, but when I did a word search, I found that in about 100k words, I had used the word "but" over a thousand times!
I am now much more careful with how I use certain words, and while I don't believe you should ever strike a word from your lexicon, knowing when and how to use it (grammar) is a skill that will without a doubt significantly improve your writing.
“Say all you have to say in the fewest possible words, or your reader will be sure to skip them; and in the plainest possible words or he will certainly misunderstand them.” - John Ruskin
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Dainas-Fantasy In reply to 914four [2013-10-01 20:15:02 +0000 UTC]
I really appreciate that quote =914four because I am a rambler who embellishes with big words thinking I was making my writing sound...fancy and highly literate, I guess....it worked out really well back in school term papers but it didn't occur to me that people would skip over the long descriptions to get to something more interesting! That makes so much sense! Our term papers had to be 1000 words, or two full pages, or whatever we were ordered to sproduce, so I did used 'filler' words. An old, bad habit!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
914four In reply to Dainas-Fantasy [2013-10-02 01:28:57 +0000 UTC]
I think it's important to find your own "voice," and sometimes what we are taught in school is more of a hindrance than an improvement. One thing I always recommend is, try reading your text aloud and listen to how it sounds. If it sounds wrong to you, it probably is. I like to read to my cats, they like the attention and I don't feel like I'm talking to myself
"Everywhere I go I'm asked if I think the university stifles writers. My opinion is that they don't stifle enough of them. There's many a bestseller that could have been prevented by a good teacher." - Flannery O'Connor
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DarlingMionette In reply to 914four [2013-07-11 20:51:22 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for taking the time to comment, you put into words exactly what I was aiming for when I wrote "Words to avoid" not so much to give people a set of guidelines to follow, but to get them thinking about the words they use and why they may not want to use them. I'm so glad you liked my article!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
914four In reply to DarlingMionette [2013-07-12 01:46:39 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for sharing it, I'll probably refer to it again when I'm ready to review the second book. What this really reminds us is not to abuse of a good thing (a "favorite" word for example).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheGargoyleAlchemist [2013-06-05 03:18:03 +0000 UTC]
You make quite a few impressive points, and I agree with a lot of them. Some, though, like saying not to use a lot of the 'weak' words are different, depending on how long the work is. If the writing is pages long, eventually readers get a bit tired of reading fancy, descriptive words, and it's nice to go back to the simple words that they probably know in multiple languages because it's one of the first things they learn. And don't forget 1st Point of View! Those often end up as a long list of "I"'s, if the writer isn't too careful. And for some odd reason, I never liked the word "gasp", especially used as a sentence with an "I" in front. But I appreciate the work that went into finding this out, and the fact that this is likely more useful than anything either of my English teachers can come up with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to TheGargoyleAlchemist [2013-06-06 12:52:27 +0000 UTC]
You are correct But those points seem to fall under the "sentence structure" category rather than words so much.. you always want to try to avoid using the same word repeatedly after itself... paragraphs and sentences should never repeat their introductory words or phrases, and likewise, sentence structure should vary to keep the reader from picking up on a redundant pattern and getting bored. I's are only a problem when overused.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheGargoyleAlchemist In reply to DarlingMionette [2013-06-20 16:41:39 +0000 UTC]
I suppose. Though with the repeatedly using words bit, apparently it's part of the 'Agatha Christie' code, and can be used in writing to literally make it addictive. But everything can be thrown out the window during dialogue, usually, since most people don't bother with structure and grammar when they're talking!
(In the case of 'I's, they frequently are overused...)
"This sentence has five words.
Here are five more words.
Five-word sentences are fine. But several together become monotonous. Listen to what is happening. The writing is getting boring. The sound of it drones. It’s like a stuck record. The ear demands some variety.
Now listen.
I vary the sentence length, and I create music.
Music. The writing sings. It has a pleasant rhythm, a lilt, a harmony.
I use short sentences. And I use sentences of medium length.
And sometimes, when I am certain the reader is rested, I will engage him with a sentence of considerable length, a sentence that burns with energy and builds with all the impetus of a crescendo, the roll of the drums, the crash of the cymbals–sounds that say listen to this:
It is important."
-[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to TheGargoyleAlchemist [2013-06-22 14:44:42 +0000 UTC]
That is a great quote, I'm certainly going to remember it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CitrineG [2013-01-24 20:21:49 +0000 UTC]
My main problem with 'make' is that it is very vague. It doesn't really give you a good idea of what's going on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PROXYBURN [2012-11-25 00:13:50 +0000 UTC]
You saved me a tremendous amount of time and effort in my first pass of self editing my book. All starting authors should read this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheThirdReviewer [2012-11-18 21:36:04 +0000 UTC]
Just a note: this probably doesn't apply if you're writing in first person in a character's voice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to TheThirdReviewer [2012-11-18 23:03:14 +0000 UTC]
very true. <-writes in first person herself.. generally all rules are thrown out in dialogue or when you're in a particular character's voice - that's sort of a given.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OpusMagenum [2012-09-24 00:52:11 +0000 UTC]
Is there something wrong with 2nd POV stories? I ask because I enjoy involving the reader in the story. They are the main character
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to OpusMagenum [2012-09-24 01:18:38 +0000 UTC]
The problem with 2nd POV stories "you open the door and see..." etc, is that because the author is constantly saying "you do this.. you do that" the reader can feel like their being bullied into the story - or being told what to do (and no one likes that feeling). It's very hard to get sucked into a story and forget that you're reading narrative (like every good author wants to happen) when you're constantly being reminded of it. In very recent years there's been a few stories that have been published in 2nd POV (i know of like.. two), but they don't generally go over well with audiences or with publishers. 3rd POV on the other hand, is considered "standard" because everyone is used to being told stories in this manner from practically the moment we're born.. "Charlotte strode to the door and..." and with 1st person POV "I strode to the door and..."(though it's not always pulled off well.. it can be challenging to write in 1st person POV because the audience never leaves the main character's side), It's less confusing than switching heads in 3rd POV constantly - but also because again, we're used to this type of story telling (this is how we hear stories when our friends tell them.. "So I went to the mall today and..". Most authors won't touch 2nd POV with a very long stick if they can help it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OpusMagenum In reply to DarlingMionette [2012-09-24 03:13:10 +0000 UTC]
*Struggles to unearth himself from beneath this massive block of text* Okay that makes sense. I can still write these stories, but they won't ever be as successful as 3rd or 1st person genres, and I'm fine with that. Besides, I like thinking outside the box and challenging the accepted norms. Such a rebel. Thanks for crushing me with your wisdom (literally) xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to OpusMagenum [2012-09-24 15:20:31 +0000 UTC]
haha sorry about the block - I just wanted to explain fully my reasoning behind what I said ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
clumsydemonwithfire [2012-06-19 17:00:19 +0000 UTC]
Wow, this is incredible! I was really curious when I read the title, and as I read through it, I realized how many of these words I use waaaaaay too much. I've been told that "show, don't tell" line but was never given an example on how to fix it. Thank you so much, you helped me a lot!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to clumsydemonwithfire [2012-06-19 19:48:42 +0000 UTC]
XD you're very welcome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
luckyveda [2012-05-22 16:51:18 +0000 UTC]
I've actually heard quite the opposite, that if you use too many glamorous words in place of common words like "said" or "look", the glamorousness will seem silly. I think it's good to use glamorous words in moderation, when you need to highlight a specific part of a sentence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to luckyveda [2012-05-22 16:59:54 +0000 UTC]
there's a difference between glamorous and different words XD.. said is one that everyone should use :3 look isn't that descriptive. It's not bad to use it every now and then, but there's a difference in action between "glance" "look" and "stare" if you mean "stare" you shouldn't always put "look" now that's totally different than using big-thesaurus words instead like "gander" "ogle" "behold". The point is to be descriptive with your narrative, not ridiculous - and not boring either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chocolato-chan [2012-03-25 18:47:29 +0000 UTC]
Using this, i managed to change my fiction into the sad story i wanted it to be, and i have a review saying she had cried reading it~
It's all thanks to you, so thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to chocolato-chan [2012-03-25 18:49:46 +0000 UTC]
aww you're very welcome! I'm glad it proved useful :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NickoMoknu272 [2012-01-20 09:33:29 +0000 UTC]
This could actually be useful to my sister she's always worrying about using too weak or impersonal words. Her method of writing consists of combining both weak words with variations at a certain interval as to not make them repeat and, thus, seem dull. @_@
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to NickoMoknu272 [2012-01-20 14:19:11 +0000 UTC]
XD well I hope it helps then!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tetrodoxin [2011-12-12 07:25:58 +0000 UTC]
Hello, I found this when I was looking for editing tips. This is a great list. The choice of words are something I've got critiqued in my own writing I'll definitely will go through my prose with your quide as help
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarlingMionette In reply to Tetrodoxin [2012-01-09 17:46:28 +0000 UTC]
i'm glad you found it helpful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>