HOME | DD

davidfoxfire — Scarlet PI--Strip 42

Published: 2005-07-09 03:22:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 3629; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 138
Redirect to original
Description For the uninitiated, Scarlet FoxFire was originally a prototype super-intelligent Character Costume for an Amusement Park, with a special photographic memory of the guests so she won't forget a face or name. She's probably going through what she has remembered so far. Since her personality and programming (including this feature) is put inside Jim's head, she probably has an unlimited number of names and faces.

Some humans may envy her.
Related content
Comments: 13

DreadedOne131 [2014-05-23 15:52:43 +0000 UTC]

Interesting seeing Scarlett put together a new composite life between her and Jim!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DreadedOne131 In reply to DreadedOne131 [2015-08-01 20:52:15 +0000 UTC]

But only Toni knows her secret!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AzabacheSilver [2014-01-21 06:33:57 +0000 UTC]

Scarlett tries to adjust to her new life?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rocketllama [2008-02-23 07:43:57 +0000 UTC]

Uh oh...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seaweedprincess [2006-11-26 05:31:05 +0000 UTC]

Finally, Scarlet is developing hips!

In the last panel, though, her hair is looking like Cthulhu's mouth. Keep it clumped together for the most part, unless she's twirling or jumping or lying down.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aut7912 [2005-07-16 09:50:52 +0000 UTC]

Jim will swap to his own like the 1st serie or not? If not, will swap to his own personality at least?

P.S.:excuse me for my poor eng

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davidfoxfire In reply to aut7912 [2005-07-17 02:17:56 +0000 UTC]

The two personalities would do some light swapping before they eventually blend into their composite persona, and the two will definitely have inner conversations between the two parts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sapphirefox1988 [2005-07-11 01:11:01 +0000 UTC]

your comics ROCK!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rulerCL [2005-07-10 01:57:12 +0000 UTC]

i just love this storry

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davidfoxfire In reply to rulerCL [2005-07-10 02:39:32 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you do. Feel free to make more comments, tell me what you like about it. What do you want to see in future pages, and all that. I'll be very attentive to your input, which will help me improve on this good thing I have.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mimi-na [2005-07-09 11:20:31 +0000 UTC]

Having just read your 'preview' picture, I finally understand what you're trying to say here.

Non-identical twins are 'fraternal', not 'paternal'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davidfoxfire In reply to mimi-na [2005-07-09 17:03:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the edit, I'll make the changes

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KriegsaffeNo9 [2005-07-09 04:10:03 +0000 UTC]

If it's just faces and names, that'd be nifty. But true eidetic memory is a real pain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0