HOME | DD

MasterOfPointillism In reply to ??? [2010-11-13 02:29:45 +0000 UTC]

In his mind ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bluepill5 In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 06:55:49 +0000 UTC]

very nice i dont like politics but in this case i see how things are and your view is very cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to bluepill5 [2010-11-13 02:30:14 +0000 UTC]

However untrue it might be ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Animated-Organs In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 06:55:30 +0000 UTC]

It makes me laugh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

captloki13 In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 06:25:02 +0000 UTC]

Barack!

Destroyer of EVIL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MasterOfPointillism In reply to R-Legend [2010-11-13 02:30:58 +0000 UTC]

No it doesn't. It's not even close ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PlasterSam In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 05:16:10 +0000 UTC]

First it was The Evil Dead, no its The Evil Dead Republicans! Perfectly done, faving now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StrayClanLeader In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:57:53 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting. XD Though according to my U.S. Government teacher, contrary to popular belief, the President doesn't actually affect the business cycle/wave much, so hey... If the economy's better by 2012, I guess the President'll get credit for it? XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MasterOfPointillism In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-13 02:32:54 +0000 UTC]

However, his policies are destroying the economy which makes business ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrayClanLeader In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 07:01:08 +0000 UTC]

His policies don't affect the business cycle as much as the general public thinks. The economy will go up and down forever, regardless of who's in the White House. The only major exception, really, was President Franklin Roosevelt in the Great Depression. It's just President Obama's bad luck that the economy happened to be heading downward when he took office.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-10 22:21:14 +0000 UTC]

But he's the man in charge and thus must pay the price for what Congress and others do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrayClanLeader In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-11 04:05:51 +0000 UTC]

Evidently. Congress and businesses. XD Poor man. I don't envy him his job, that's for sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-11 04:10:46 +0000 UTC]

I'd do it, just so we can invade Canada

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MasterOfPointillism In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-13 02:33:56 +0000 UTC]

Everyone knows that Canada is just a suburb of Detroit and that's why no one goes there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 04:31:10 +0000 UTC]

I usually refer to Canada as North Michigan

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-13 06:00:19 +0000 UTC]

That would work ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StrayClanLeader In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-11 09:32:42 +0000 UTC]

Well, come to think of it, I'd do it to improve relations with the Islamic nations (personal priority). Not that I'm sure I meet Constitutional requirements -born a U.S. citizen but not on U.S. ground- and I might not be President material, but hey, we can dream. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MasterOfPointillism In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-13 02:35:32 +0000 UTC]

Why do you think we need to and/or can improve relations with anyone seeking our destruction?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrayClanLeader In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 07:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Because "improved relations" sort of implies the absence of a wish for destruction, does it not? What, you'd rather be at war than settle issues peacefully? It's entirely possible; take the Cold War as an example. I'll bet no one back then ever imagined friendliness with Russia; yet here we are, with no more Cold War. Obviously it'll take some effort on their part as well. Fortunately, the maniacs over there represent a minority, like America's K.K.K. did/does. Unfortunately, they're just as out of control as the K.K.K. was in the post-Civil War era. Gonna take some time to smooth this one over. XD Just like when the U.S. was in hysterics over the spread of "communism" (which was actually socialism, since it included governments, unlike communism, which has no government and has never been put into practice, but that's entirely beside the point... XD).

My only point being, I'd rather not have any countries snarling at each other like rabid dogs. X3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-12 03:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Well I don't think the United States needs to have better relations with Mulsim nations. Not until they start allowing freedom of speech, end the honor killings and arrainged marriages, and stop whining about how the world is "anti-Islam".

But I would still invade Canada

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrayClanLeader In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-13 07:09:17 +0000 UTC]

Aha, but bad relations with them won't help that. Pressures from foreign nations will only make them more fiercely "we do things our way", and having grown up over there, I can say that with absolute certainty. I don't like it, but I know it, 'cause I know those people. And... it's not like Western civilization never had arranged marraiges or always had freedom of speech, and they didn't have to deal with superpower nations looming over them, shouting at them to get their acts together. X3

So... what did Canada ever do the U.S.? XD Just out of curiosity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to StrayClanLeader [2010-11-13 07:20:03 +0000 UTC]

I don't think Canada did anything. BUT they're a lot closer then Afghanistan, so we'll save fuel on the bombing runs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StrayClanLeader In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2010-11-13 07:29:30 +0000 UTC]

Ah. XD Okie dokie, then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Virtu-Imagery In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:48:36 +0000 UTC]

I love this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aneirin-Aryon In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:45:33 +0000 UTC]

I get it. Lol. Awesome illustration. It's got great wit to it. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrokenEye3 In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:43:24 +0000 UTC]

i concur with this

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

manifestoartwar In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:29:51 +0000 UTC]

yeah...why..???

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rurudyne In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:23:05 +0000 UTC]

If only Zombie Reagan could have run instead of McLame.

Though Zombie Goldwater would have been better still.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to Rurudyne [2010-11-13 02:36:17 +0000 UTC]

THIS!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mysticross In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:22:03 +0000 UTC]

hahahah, that's the very same President Obama who'd just visited our country

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to mysticross [2010-11-13 02:36:52 +0000 UTC]

Can you ask him to stay?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mysticross In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 02:50:09 +0000 UTC]

don't you want him back to your country? we'll gladly accept him

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to mysticross [2010-11-13 03:05:07 +0000 UTC]

Please! Take him! He is costing us too much!!!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mysticross In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 05:04:48 +0000 UTC]

too bad, he's gone to the Korea two days ago

hahah, how come? is it because of the Health Law?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MasterOfPointillism In reply to mysticross [2010-11-13 05:59:35 +0000 UTC]

It's because of all the 'changes' that he's made to our country that nobody wanted ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mysticross In reply to MasterOfPointillism [2010-11-13 16:59:00 +0000 UTC]

well yeah, but no changes could make your country goes straight into disaster too :/ (that sort of what's been happening in my country )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xrift In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:19:49 +0000 UTC]

This drawing... it's so epic, love the movie reference oh so much lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

M-Skirvin In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:15:23 +0000 UTC]

This is AWESOME! And it puts to image everything I have groused about for the last year regarding the political landscape....

Thanks for this. Sanity does exist....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jokeryuki6 In reply to ??? [2010-11-10 04:12:43 +0000 UTC]

This is AWESOME! it is still relevant even today. Great stuff!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0