HOME | DD

Deep-Hurting β€” The Evil Dead

Published: 2009-05-02 09:26:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 39993; Favourites: 1848; Downloads: 709
Redirect to original
Description Apparently I draw zombies well with quite a lot of ease. Who knew?

This cartoon got quite a bit of traffic on my website thanks to Reddit and Stumbleupon... unfortunately, that didn't keep up longer than a couple of days.

I think I may make a habit of posting editorial cartoons here a few days/maybe a week after they show up on my cartoon blog, so if you wanna see stuff when it's fresh, go here .

This particular cartoon can be found in its native environment right here .
Related content
Comments: 497

MegaManNtWarriorLove In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 21:06:24 +0000 UTC]

awesome dude, all tho, I wouldv'e had him drowning in a mob of zombies lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IrritusNovus In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 21:01:11 +0000 UTC]

Please somehow get this in the news paper... I will love you to death if you do! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Riyoushi-Bloodfire In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:57:28 +0000 UTC]

Well at least they aren't HEADCRAB ZOMBIES!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusAteMyShrooms In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:57:20 +0000 UTC]

Hahahhaa. Love this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nikolicious In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:45:00 +0000 UTC]

God, his ears <3333 XD!

Awesome! Looks epic in black and white *.* β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Wilco5 In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:40:12 +0000 UTC]

Too bad that in real life Communist-symphathizing Obama is a big softy that can barely carry a big stick albiet pitch a ball like a girly-man, lol. Obama is straight up Soviet-style Cult of Personality...all about image and photo ops. No wonder Commies are Reagan Haters.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Shydrow In reply to Wilco5 [2010-11-10 01:50:50 +0000 UTC]

Wait Reagen was a movie star and got elected for his popular image.... So Reagan must be a communist. He also helped the business claiming it would help the people OMFG REAGAN AND OBAMA ARE THE SAME PERSON JUST LOOK AT THEM SIDE BY SIDE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnnaKlava In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-10 02:40:54 +0000 UTC]

So is Arnold Schwarzeneggar. And is the Govorner in Cali and did movies. D: What if that guy is the next Regan. Holy shit. D:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to AnnaKlava [2010-11-10 04:13:42 +0000 UTC]

O GOD!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnnaKlava In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-10 23:53:10 +0000 UTC]

We need to build nuke shelters. NAO!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to AnnaKlava [2010-11-11 00:13:05 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AnnaKlava In reply to Wilco5 [2010-11-10 01:32:55 +0000 UTC]

Wait wait don't forget, Obama is also HITLER.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DmanLT21 In reply to AnnaKlava [2010-11-10 01:42:17 +0000 UTC]

Well that's pretty much what Wilco5 said... Cult of personality.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AnnaKlava In reply to DmanLT21 [2010-11-10 02:41:55 +0000 UTC]

Lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GodsOnVacation In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:38:49 +0000 UTC]

Because of the undead masses?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fireforeffect In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:36:50 +0000 UTC]

Great cartoon! I think there is further symbolism here. Since we enjoyed our greatest peacetime expansion at the time during Reagan, not to mention recovery from one of our worst economic times, it is only fitting to see Obama fighting rabidly against those things that clearly worked. I guess after Tuesday, most of America agrees with that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to fireforeffect [2010-11-10 01:51:18 +0000 UTC]

You missed the point. As well as history class.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fireforeffect In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-10 08:27:10 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate your historical revisionism. That is why you are an artist; because facts and reality mean little to you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to fireforeffect [2010-11-10 13:47:18 +0000 UTC]

Actually i have the facts and reality. Reaganomics only work for a short term before they start leaving the country. They also only work if the company is held accountable to their actions. Otherwise it's just letting them do whatever they want and to have no restrictions on a business has shown time and time again that they will abuse it cause it is not their job to be socially acceptable or friendly it is to make money and that is fine and all good for them but again that is why we need restrictions.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fireforeffect In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-11 07:46:11 +0000 UTC]

That might actally be the single most uneducated thing I have ever heard. Reaganomics only works for a little while before who leaves the country? It only works if businesses are held accountable? What? So if businesses are not held accountable then it does not work? Businesses wetre not held accountable during Reagan? Any facts to back that up? What restrictions do we need that were not in place? Have you ever taken an economics class or a history calss in your life? Where did you get this bumper sticker half thought out illiterate tripe? This was truly a testament to stupidity.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to fireforeffect [2010-11-11 14:04:05 +0000 UTC]

Glade to see you backed that up with your own facts. You can do a simple google to check on its failures you don't need to be an economist to understand it either. I know you think claiming "Well your no expert" works but we live in the real world sir where things like that don't work cause as long as you have a computer you can do research.

[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]

That last one is a blog so you don't need to count it. Also wiki pages require you to go to the bottom of the page and see where they got their information to be accurate.

Now i know your use to the little kid who yells and whines about you tossing out your big insults but sadly for you i am not one of them. I am educated and will continue to be educated on matters of the world and my profession.

Also as you said "Have you ever taken an economics class or a history calss in your life?" and "Have you ever taken an economics class or a history calss in your life?" Well i hope you did and have some evidence to show besides the short successes of it that t works.

Also its class not calss.

Good talk though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fireforeffect In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-14 20:19:44 +0000 UTC]

Oh I went to your page. You are very young; it makes perfect sense now. A couple of words of advice - posting links without being able to incorporate them into an argument does not make you appear educated, it makes you appear able to use Google. Scanning for information you think substantiates a point is called confirmation bias. Also, posting Wiki as a source of opinion further diminishes your credibility. Most college classes disallow this as a source. Lastly, beware posting Mises when aruing economics - they are very pro tax cut and absolutely despise Obama and his economic policies.

No worries, as you get more experience you will catch on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shydrow In reply to fireforeffect [2010-11-15 00:50:37 +0000 UTC]

First off i pointed out where on the wiki pages to go and not to use them. "Also wiki pages require you to go to the bottom of the page and see where they got their information to be accurate. " Now maybe i should have said "use the fucking reference link" also we are not in college and you can fact check all that information already on other sites posted. Another error you made is youth since age only proves that you have the ability to know potential more. Not that you do. I looked up the economy statistics and you can too cause if i a young man can use google you should be able as well. Also you hide your age so from now on you are 5 years old and thus i win to add in some childish joy into this.

Don't worry though i'm sure your "It's bias" argument will work out well. I mean really if everything i show is bias then really i can't win. Just like if i claim Obama isn't american and if actually Hitler and everything you post to disprove that is bias.

Also post the economic statistics of the past years after Regan up to Obama. Not only do we see Bush being the cause of this mess but Bush also is a person who believes in Reaganomics. Now i'm tired of debating this point so i will withdraw. Not that it matters since obviously i am too young and know nothing about anything.

Then again at least i showed some effort instead of trying to disprove my opponent like you. Though really that is just a good move. Proving me wrong doesn't make you right though it just makes me wrong and only a 5 year old like you [see i'm harming your online character i'm so cheeky] would think that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fireforeffect In reply to Shydrow [2010-11-15 20:08:14 +0000 UTC]

Obviously you have never heard the term "confirmation bias". You should look it up. It is not in reference to your opinion, it is in reference to cherry picking information to support a preconceived notion.

"Also post the economic statistics of the past years after Regan up to Obama. Not only do we see Bush being the cause of this mess but Bush also is a person who believes in Reaganomics". Can you factually correlate that with anything other than your opinion? In fact the major event that caused the recession was the housing bubble. Do you have any idea why this happened? Very briefly, it was an artficial stimulation of the money supply that made revenue readily available to anyone who wanted it. Unfortunately, this caused too much money to chase after too few goods. While cheap money causes a temporary increase in values (home prices going up), once the saturation point passes, it causes a huge drop in values, and a tightening of the money supply. Suddenly people owned homes that were worth less than they owed. Banks stopped loaning money, so businesses contracted. Unemployment went up and production went down. We started the recession. The policy that allowed this willy nilly loaning of money was called the fair housing act, under Clinton.

How did Bush respond? He launched the TARP designed to pump money into the economy and stimulate lending again. Unfortunately, you can’t make scared businesses lend and it failed.

And what did Obama do? Doubled down on the failed TARP. Jammed through unwanted health care reform. Threatened tax increases and cap and trade. Increased the deficit and the debt to record proportions never before imagined. Unemployment skyrocketed. Production fell further. Defaults went up higher. He took what was a bad economy and destroyed it by his foolish policies and his incredible inexperience.

However under Reagan, we had the largest peace time expansion in history up to that point. Taxes went down, revenues went up, unemployment was low, consumer confidence was high. He was successful!
Please tell me what area of the economy is better under Obama than Reagan.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PandaESL In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:32:42 +0000 UTC]

Very funny! ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Alpha-Xis In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:22:52 +0000 UTC]

Dead Rising: Obama Edition. Good job ROFLCOPTER

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

moniquej In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:15:54 +0000 UTC]

I love this cartoon! Nice sense of action, and it's highly entertaining while telling about what politics feels like in this country nowadays

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Griolf In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:06:24 +0000 UTC]

ROFLMFAO! xD I CANT BREATH! THIS IS TOO HILARIOUS!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DesperateMe In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:04:44 +0000 UTC]

Super-impose Camerons face here & you've got us Brits too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spring-sky In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 20:02:58 +0000 UTC]

Amazing

I loved it .

Congrats for the DD ,really well desereved

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AtomicStoney In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:51:19 +0000 UTC]

Haha, this is brilliant.

Although I think Obama has been battling the economic Reaganites with a limp fish instead of a boom stick.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PresidentGrasshopper In reply to AtomicStoney [2010-11-09 19:58:06 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

Speaking softly + carrying a big stick = you will go far.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AtomicStoney In reply to PresidentGrasshopper [2010-11-09 20:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Yup.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ConorMJM In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:46:29 +0000 UTC]

Love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rothers2005 In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:43:42 +0000 UTC]

Should this not be called 'the evil debt'??? umm no emot for chessy!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Deep-Hurting In reply to rothers2005 [2010-11-11 12:26:58 +0000 UTC]

That's actually really clever. Wish I'd thought of it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cyryn In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:37:26 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful depiction of politics, art, satire, and humor.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shidaku In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:37:00 +0000 UTC]

haha, this put a smile on my face today, and reading the comments of who "got it" was quite fun. Good work on both the quality and the message.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LHMiller In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:34:34 +0000 UTC]

perfect!! Is that a Dick Cheney model shotgun ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HazardousRaptor In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:34:18 +0000 UTC]

This is beyond even epicness. Army Of Darkness+Obama= best thing EVER!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

greypuff In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:23:46 +0000 UTC]

Pity the DA admins lost their credibility a long time ago.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lofto In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:15:03 +0000 UTC]

LOLz

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xcelsius In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:12:41 +0000 UTC]

looks like dead rising 2^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

heysawbones In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:04:33 +0000 UTC]

Puttin' this on my profile page. THANKS.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

neurotype-on-discord In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 19:01:41 +0000 UTC]

Seriously yes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tessombra In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 18:59:42 +0000 UTC]

Just a bit of sugar to make the medicine go down.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Badgers-Revenge In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 18:56:09 +0000 UTC]

If i could favorite this a hundred times over, i would

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Spaz777 [2010-11-09 18:46:31 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, simply awesome. I love Bruce Campbell, but Obama's kind of a joke.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

R-Complex25 [2010-11-09 18:41:07 +0000 UTC]

Damn. Where as this been? You know how long we've been waiting to see something like this? It's true though, Obama is facing down an army of Congressional Deadites to get his plans through. Excellent metaphor!

I can see the speech on this one, " My fellow Americans, this is my BOOMSTICK. Now if you of you Republican screwheads even touches me...." *shoots deadite back into the pit*.

I'm definitely keeping an eye on you work. In fact this would be the only Political Cartoon I'd read.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

junoXinu In reply to R-Complex25 [2010-11-11 03:31:52 +0000 UTC]

At least Bush wasn't completely helpless without a teleprompter to make a speech. :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>