HOME | DD

DragonQuestWes — Fuck the updated block feature

Published: 2010-07-11 22:42:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 9383; Favourites: 200; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description There are a few of you who may think that this is a good thing. But you know what I think? It's not. I'll tell you why:

It used to be that when you block someone, they just can't reply to your page. But for some reason, dA thought it was a good idea to update it so that people can't reply to you AT ALL. ANYWHERE. It may sound good at first but if you really REALLY think about it, it will backfire and create even more drama.

It is possible for trolls to abuse this updated block feature and spam your page with multiple sockpuppet accounts that you can't reply to because you're blocked. "So what?" You say, "you can just block back or report them." True. But what if this happens to you?

Also, what if you wanted negotiate for a diplomatic solution (or in simpler terms, talk it over)? There has to be at least some way to put an end to the drama if you wanted to end it. "Oh, if you get blocked, chances are you deserved it and don't deserve second chances." Butthurt anti-second chancers can eat a dick for all I care. I believe in second chances, but I also believe in taking responsibility for your own shit. So fuck you to butthurt anti-second chancers.

TL;DR: The updated block feature sucks and will only do more damage than good.
Related content
Comments: 255

DragonQuestWes In reply to ??? [2010-08-11 19:49:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Glad you do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ocean-Lights In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-08-11 19:50:34 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. <:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkstar07 In reply to ??? [2010-08-01 11:09:58 +0000 UTC]

Rather late, I know, but I support this all the way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to darkstar07 [2010-08-01 16:26:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScrapBee In reply to ??? [2010-07-29 22:00:26 +0000 UTC]

Darn! And I was looking for information about 'Blocking' today too. I only want to keep a certain person from constantly spamming my messages with useless things that have become quite irritating, but if I need to talk to them I still want that option.
So, now if I were to block them I will also be blocked from any sort of communication with them outside of my message board?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to ScrapBee [2010-07-29 22:06:14 +0000 UTC]

As of right now, when you block someone, they can't reply to you anywhere whatsoever. You can reply to them (unless you block back) but they can't reply to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ScrapBee In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-29 22:30:26 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh... I suppose if i don't really want to have anything to do with them I just wont bother trying to talk to them anyway. But, what I'm trying to do is get them out of my messages, they just clog it up with useless junk posts (and I'm not being mean).
I've taken them off my 'Watched' list, can always just go and check out their gallery because they do have talent. Still see posts from them even when I click off their posts in my messages though. Weird that their messages, though I click the 'delete' button they pop right back up again when my back is turned
If, however, I were to block them would this help and more importantly, will they know I blocked them? Will DA tell them?

Thanks for the help

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to ScrapBee [2010-07-29 22:42:33 +0000 UTC]

DA doesn't immediately notify the ones who are blocked.

I don't know what you mean by that you could still see their messages.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ScrapBee In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-29 23:44:48 +0000 UTC]

Oh well, I read on a search that they are not notified by DA.
As for my still seeing their messages, I guess I needed to reload my browser because they are gone now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nayou In reply to ??? [2010-07-26 01:14:11 +0000 UTC]

I approve.

Today, I got blocked for the first time on DA [that I'm aware of] from a girl who found very offensive one of my pools where I'm asking '' How you feel about atheist people.? '' and announcing that I'm an atheist myself.

How did I know.? She wrote a comment on this pool in these terms : '' I HATE YOU.! POLLS ARE MEANT TO BE FUNNY.! THIS POOL IS NOT FUNNY!! Why should I care about you stupid atheist!? I can't believe I have watched an atheist for so long!!! GET AWAY!! ''.
My reaction :
[I couldn't even reply to her comment since she blocked me right after that.]

Anyway. Now, I don't have any ways to talk to her. I'm a nice girl [or, at least, I think I am ] and I don't like when things end dramatically like in this case. I would love to have the opportunity to settle things down [especially since I know that I did nothing wrong ].

So well, thanks a lot for this stamp.!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

greelytourmaline In reply to Nayou [2015-06-09 06:44:02 +0000 UTC]

Oo raindrop! (sorry it's an inside joke and i couldn't resist. lol)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonQuestWes In reply to Nayou [2010-07-26 01:17:27 +0000 UTC]

Holy crap. Such unneeded overreaction.

Not a problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jezzy-Fezzy In reply to ??? [2010-07-13 01:18:18 +0000 UTC]

The new block feature can suck it!

But I approve this stamp indeed!


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Jezzy-Fezzy [2010-07-13 01:42:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jezzy-Fezzy In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-13 01:44:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Black-Allison In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 23:51:23 +0000 UTC]

Fuck yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Black-Allison [2010-07-13 00:05:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HisnameisDaveyoufool In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 22:15:21 +0000 UTC]

Well said.

I already made a well-received suggestions forum thread that the block feature should be two sided, so that if you block someone, you also block yourself from making contact with the person you blocked. Keep it alive if you want: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

DragonQuestWes In reply to HisnameisDaveyoufool [2010-07-12 22:25:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and...

@ your suggestions thread.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HisnameisDaveyoufool In reply to HisnameisDaveyoufool [2010-07-12 22:19:35 +0000 UTC]

Wait, did you already post in it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to HisnameisDaveyoufool [2010-07-13 00:06:48 +0000 UTC]

I posted in it when you showed me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheHideousBirdchild In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 20:59:23 +0000 UTC]

Honestly, it's just giving me more reasons to keep using my old account to troll the wolfaboos 'n such. *shrug*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to TheHideousBirdchild [2010-07-12 21:09:32 +0000 UTC]

Did they block your old account too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheHideousBirdchild In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 21:36:56 +0000 UTC]

Most of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x-Aiko-chan-x In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 11:54:37 +0000 UTC]

Fuck it so hard.
I hated the block feature before. But this is just ridiculous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to x-Aiko-chan-x [2010-07-12 16:49:55 +0000 UTC]

Let's fuck it together!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-Aiko-chan-x In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 17:08:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kung-fu-girl90 In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 08:31:14 +0000 UTC]

:/ It does suck and it is happening as well. I think I saw a thread in the forums about this.

Hope it changes back to how it was before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Kung-fu-girl90 [2010-07-12 16:49:38 +0000 UTC]

I can say the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kitsumekat In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 04:09:59 +0000 UTC]

I can smell the backfire...It's a dream come true! dA became the new MySpace/ fb!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to kitsumekat [2010-07-12 04:28:22 +0000 UTC]

For me, it was like that years ago.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kitsumekat In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 04:58:25 +0000 UTC]

For the admins.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nara-Cherry-Blossom In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 03:27:35 +0000 UTC]

Inb4 dArama of ~GhostPenis -esque proportions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Nara-Cherry-Blossom [2010-07-12 03:28:46 +0000 UTC]

lol

I don't really care about GhostPenis or any of the SillyZone people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nara-Cherry-Blossom In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 08:36:25 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.. This whole new block thing just got me remembering it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Avalik In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 00:45:54 +0000 UTC]

Trolls can spam your page regardless of the new block feature, the only difference is you can't reply. Which isn't much of a difference, seeing as they're trolls.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Avalik [2010-07-12 00:48:13 +0000 UTC]

DA's just probably gonna expect us to block them back.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WatermelonBread In reply to ??? [2010-07-12 00:24:14 +0000 UTC]

The new feature bestowed upon DA's users is nothing more than a synthetic dog poop toy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to WatermelonBread [2010-07-12 00:26:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheseKrimzonFlames In reply to ??? [2010-07-11 23:58:40 +0000 UTC]

I'm agreeing, to a point. Sadly, there are far too many trolls here that cause shit because they can, and dont want it resloved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to TheseKrimzonFlames [2010-07-12 00:10:34 +0000 UTC]

If it's those "Joined today!" trolls, I'm not too worried about those because they often get banned within like 3-5 days.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheseKrimzonFlames In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 02:48:02 +0000 UTC]

That they do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuffocatingRomano In reply to ??? [2010-07-11 23:30:39 +0000 UTC]

TRUE.
...dA sucks at updating things, doesn't it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to SuffocatingRomano [2010-07-12 00:08:09 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes. I mean, they should at least give it some thought before updating the thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuffocatingRomano In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-12 03:17:02 +0000 UTC]

True. But the mods live in a fantasy world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Little-Rin-Chan In reply to ??? [2010-07-11 23:16:14 +0000 UTC]

>w< You make a valid point here D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Little-Rin-Chan [2010-07-11 23:17:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks but I'm exactly the brightest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RachBurns In reply to ??? [2010-07-11 23:15:56 +0000 UTC]

It's a pity that one couldn't screenshot Prosaix(sp? anyway, just an example) over her 'intelligence' when this new thing showed up. One sided blocking is royally goofed, and that's the perfect reason as to why!
Then again I don't doubt that someone did and no one gave a hoot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to RachBurns [2010-07-11 23:18:37 +0000 UTC]

I nearly forgot about her. Wonder what she's been doing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RachBurns In reply to DragonQuestWes [2010-07-11 23:32:20 +0000 UTC]

Probably having ten tons of fun that she 'can't be shown wrong' or something. All she has to do is give her opinion, and block whoever'll go against her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>