HOME | DD

F16CrewChief β€” On any given day on a SAC base

Published: 2014-03-29 20:57:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 499; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description KC-135A-10-BN, 57-2599 assigned to the 905th ARS, 319th BW on the "SAC Ramp" at Grand Forks AFB seen in April 1981.

This was the large ramp where most of the daily fliers were parked and most of the line maintenance took place.

I like the 'busy' feelingΒ this picture conveys of the hard work that took place every day to maintain these jets.
Related content
Comments: 10

thefightingfalcon08 [2015-04-20 02:21:02 +0000 UTC]

I always liked the KC-135...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to thefightingfalcon08 [2015-04-20 12:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Me too. Β I have flown on several of these and I always enjoyed the flights. Β I really like the looks of the jet. They look best as the KC-135E f16crewchief.deviantart.com/ar… / C-135B variants f16crewchief.deviantart.com/ar… with the TF-33 fans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NavJAG [2014-04-02 00:48:23 +0000 UTC]

Well worth the cost of keeping those birds flying!Β  Wonder how the new tankers will compare...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to NavJAG [2014-04-05 13:16:32 +0000 UTC]

I hope they do well.Β  From what I have gathered the 767 is a successful design, though it is possibly the ugliest airliner ever built...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to F16CrewChief [2014-05-21 00:54:10 +0000 UTC]

Should have stuck with the Airbus...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to putrick [2014-05-21 23:35:31 +0000 UTC]

If it's not Boeing, I'm not going...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to F16CrewChief [2014-05-22 11:56:31 +0000 UTC]

Aiiiiirbuuuussss...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to putrick [2014-05-23 23:11:36 +0000 UTC]

No... I still feel that the country should buy major weapons systems from local companies. Imagine if France does not like a military action the US gets involved with and shuts off the supply pipeline. Remember the Swedish P-35s's?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

putrick In reply to F16CrewChief [2014-05-24 00:41:17 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure that was the reason, even if I agree with you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to putrick [2014-05-24 10:41:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0