HOME | DD

Published: 2013-03-18 18:11:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 9878; Favourites: 162; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Since visiting Loch Ness last spring, I’ve had a rekindled interest in Nessie, so I dug out my old books and went through the sightings and witness sketches. Interestingly, the monster has been seen on land a fair number of times. Also interestingly (to me at least) is the changing image of Nessie over the years.The earliest clear descriptions indicate a camel-like animal (group of children, 1879; E.H. Bright, 1880; William MacGruer, 1912; Mrs. Cameron, 1919; Col. Fordyce, 1933).
Then there was a phase of otter-like (though very large) creatures, with short, webbed feet, short necks, short faces, and humped backs. These include Alfred Cruickshank, 1923; Mrs. Reid, 1933; Mrs. MacLennan, 1933; Jean MacDonald and Patricia Harvey, 1934.
The Spicers reported a truly odd beast in 1933, with its elephant-like skin, undulating, skinny neck, and bulky body. My drawing is a reproduction of the sketch that accompanied the earliest description of their sighting.
Finally, Arthur Grant’s famous sighting of January, 1934 set the standard for Nessie: 20 feet (6 m long) with a long neck, small head, 4 flippers rather than legs, a long, heavy tail, and humped back. This form was repeated often (Margaret Munro, 1934; Torquil MacLeod, 1960) and immortalized 3 months after Grant’s report by the infamous “Surgeon’s photo.” From that point forward, Nessie looked like a plesiosaur/seal hybrid, just as Grant had verbally described it. I’ve drawn a close reproduction of Grant’s own sketch (his first version, which one presumes to most accurately reflect what he saw) showing a dark brown animal with two humps, sea lion-like front flippers, and mammalian-appearing hind limbs.
The least well-known land sighting was reported by a landscape artist, Alastair Dallas, who drew the animal as it sucked weed off shoreline rocks in 1936. His Nessie is absolutely unique, and my personal favorite. Looking like a cross between a sea horse, a camel, and a sturgeon, it never caught on with the public. I guess plesiosaurs are more appealing to the masses for some reason.
Just a note that this piece has been featured in part at this blog: bizarrezoology.blogspot.com/20…
Check it out for some interesting information on lake monsters and plesiosaurs!
Related content
Comments: 40
tcr11050 [2019-05-03 22:04:01 +0000 UTC]
Though we could assume those two earlier sightings might've been an otter, and a vicuna that escaped from a farm it might've been imported too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-17 23:12:02 +0000 UTC]
This is amazing! Could I possibly use this to illustrate the Loch Ness variations in a Youtube Video? I will credit it you
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-17 23:48:52 +0000 UTC]
Sure. Thanks for asking.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2016-09-18 14:50:35 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! Thank you so much
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Franz-Josef73 In reply to Traheripteryx [2015-02-19 01:20:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man. It was fun to put together.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Franz-Josef73 In reply to gytalf2000 [2015-02-06 17:46:01 +0000 UTC]
Totally agree. The historical aspect is even more interesting than the alleged monster itself I think!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tomozaurus [2013-04-06 23:40:13 +0000 UTC]
That Alastair Dallas weed sucking one is a really neat and interesting design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to Tomozaurus [2013-04-07 00:15:25 +0000 UTC]
It's definitely the most creative claimed sighting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orionide5 [2013-03-31 03:48:36 +0000 UTC]
At first I thought this would be a try at an actual interpretation of the evolution of "cadborosaurids." My guess would be freshwater ungulates, perhaps related to camels or giraffes. Maybe the mokele-mbembe is a cadborosaurid?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to Orionide5 [2013-04-03 16:56:33 +0000 UTC]
Since "cadborosaurids" are in fact, decayed carcasses of sharks and other marine creatures, I wouldn't worry about their evolution too much. And mokele-mbembe is probably a local legend that the natives had a good laugh over while sending crazy white guys into the swamps to fend off bugs and trench foot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orionide5 In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2013-04-04 00:35:06 +0000 UTC]
Maybe you misunderstood... I thought you were treating the "cadborosaurids" as though they were an actual group of animals, and making an evolutionary history of them just for fun. I agree that the creatures I mentioned probably don't exist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to Orionide5 [2013-04-04 00:51:36 +0000 UTC]
Oooooohh. Oh. I see now. Right. Ok.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Franz-Josef73 In reply to 95ACgrfs1228 [2013-03-30 02:09:48 +0000 UTC]
Alastair Dallas was a creative fellow, that's for sure!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
95ACgrfs1228 In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2013-03-30 02:41:44 +0000 UTC]
I'm currently trying to make ways on making the weed sucker look scarier and more menacing...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
95ACgrfs1228 In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2013-04-03 18:03:54 +0000 UTC]
Who knows, if I make a cryptid-fighting game, it might look like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gytalf2000 [2013-03-20 14:36:05 +0000 UTC]
Fascinating! I remember reading about the sightings of the creature on land, way back in the 1970s, when my interest in Nessie (and cryptozoological creatures in general) was first sparked. I love the image of the various beasties that people have supposedly encountered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to gytalf2000 [2013-03-20 15:01:44 +0000 UTC]
Hey, many thanks for the watch and for taking the time to comment! Nessie as an evolving form of folk tale is a fascinating topic for me. Same with BigFoot, aliens, U.F.O.s and all that great stuff. As a fellow child of the '70s, I was always a huge fan of "In Search Of." Nimoy ROCKS!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gytalf2000 In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2013-03-20 15:41:56 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I love those topics! I was born in 1960. I started reading books about Fortean phenomena around 1971 (Frank Edwards' "Stranger Than Science", and all that fun stuff); I was fifteen when the "In Search Of..." show first aired. Ah, the memories!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DeadloveCalling [2013-03-19 04:28:15 +0000 UTC]
wow, these look really fabulous I think I want to hug that bottom one, and for some reason that would make more sense to me than a plesiosaur- like a kind of 'missing link' or 'living fossil'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to DeadloveCalling [2013-03-19 11:19:56 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I agree. Plesiosaurs or relic fossil types are highly unimaginative. The weed sucker has got it going in!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kazuma27 [2013-03-18 22:27:00 +0000 UTC]
It reminds me of the "nessie-craze" i had through the first half of the 90s; during that golden period of my childhood i read, saw and collected almost everything that was about good ol' Nessie.
Today i'm skeptical there was truly a prehistoric creature of some sort buuuut... Wouldn't rule out the possibility that there could be definitely something in that lake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to Kazuma27 [2013-03-18 23:14:53 +0000 UTC]
Same here. I'd LOVE for the monster to exist, but there's no way it makes ANY biological sense. A great story though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kazuma27 In reply to Franz-Josef73 [2013-03-19 09:19:54 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, it's a great legend indeed!
Wish i'd visit Loch Ness, someday
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RickCharlesOfficial [2013-03-18 21:42:31 +0000 UTC]
That weed-sucker is certainly interesting. Dallas claims he drew the thing while he was watching it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to RickCharlesOfficial [2013-03-18 22:00:35 +0000 UTC]
Yes. He said he watched it for about 20-30 minutes and eventually threw his sandwich at it after doing the sketch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yoult [2013-03-18 18:25:08 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting! I'm also diggind for the Alastair-depiction. Too bad we have no illustrated reports of the sightings before 1800.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franz-Josef73 In reply to yoult [2013-03-18 18:55:06 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, the weed sucker is the best. I'm hoping he makes a comeback in this century.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0