HOME | DD

Harm-Less — Slickforce Redesign

Published: 2009-04-30 13:08:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 5501; Favourites: 46; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Redesign for Slickforce.com . I uploaded two of my designs. The top one is chosen but I liked the bottom one most, that's why I added it to.
They requested a "perfect" design, so It took about 20 - 30 hours because of the many revisions. I never spend so much time on only a design

I offered to also do the coding but the client said he already got that covered. I really dislike what the coder did with it. Shit happens

Anyway, having Slickforce as a client is really an honor. You probably seen work from them but you simply didn't realized it.
Related content
Comments: 29

silent-Princee [2011-05-06 07:51:05 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

silent-Princee [2011-01-05 08:50:16 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EnzuDes1gn [2009-05-12 15:54:48 +0000 UTC]

great client, nice design, loving the blue also

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tecwzrd [2009-05-06 20:43:14 +0000 UTC]

Coder should be shot, not so much because he screwed around with your design which I suspect came from the client more than him/her but because he has 144 W3C errors on the main page and 60+ on every other page

Blue design rocks, white not so much. Nice to have as a client though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to tecwzrd [2009-05-08 13:20:08 +0000 UTC]

Yes he should

This was the most serious and professional client I've had so far.
Thanks for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Grafeco [2009-05-05 12:10:54 +0000 UTC]

nice working

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Torsten85 [2009-05-05 10:52:49 +0000 UTC]

2nd one rulez!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OldBoyGLA [2009-05-03 23:54:05 +0000 UTC]

Love the second one most.
But yeah, the coder really ruined the header IMO.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to OldBoyGLA [2009-05-08 14:06:31 +0000 UTC]

Yup, he did
Thanks for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tehacesequence [2009-05-01 18:10:34 +0000 UTC]

lol I haven't recognise your layout on the current site ;d 2nd looks better for me, but the dropdowns are tragic ;d I supose they haven't been designed by you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moex [2009-05-01 11:37:46 +0000 UTC]

they are both really nice.. but my favourite is the second,too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Svendsen [2009-05-01 08:23:53 +0000 UTC]

I like the last version the best. In my opinion the "sub"-menu is th best feature of the site. Like it quite much.

The coded version were odd, and the dropdown ruined it all. :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kenv [2009-05-01 05:53:41 +0000 UTC]

well done mate! i totaly love the style and obviously the background, looks pretty. Only one thing... fillin empty spaces on left and right column else then that, it deserved a favorite!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arscube [2009-05-01 02:48:20 +0000 UTC]

Nice work. I only regret the fact that the navigation is barely visible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Terame [2009-05-01 00:56:18 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful work - I love both versions!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MyRule [2009-04-30 22:03:14 +0000 UTC]

I prefer the blue version aswell, looks sweet

It sucks that the coder messed it up, I've seen that happen quite a few times... :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to MyRule [2009-04-30 22:38:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment

Well, I understand its not possible to make every design exactly like the photoshop file. But he...messed up pretty bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MyRule In reply to Harm-Less [2009-05-01 20:07:51 +0000 UTC]

It may be a bit hard to make every pixel the same as the original, but he took a bit too much freedom IMO. Its a shame with such a nice design...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

conjecture [2009-04-30 20:31:44 +0000 UTC]

I can tell you, your design is much nicer than the coders version of it.

The blue background one is also much nicer, and I'm glad you prefer it It has alot more depth to it, which adds loads of character and class to the design.

Really good work, and its a shame that the coder did what they did to it... At least you can be happy deep down knowing that you could have a done a better job of it than him

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to conjecture [2009-04-30 20:42:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the kind words

Both versions are mine he only coded it.

About your words on the blue design. That's exactly what I was thinking

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

conjecture In reply to Harm-Less [2009-05-01 16:33:42 +0000 UTC]

No problem ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EmpireFX [2009-04-30 19:10:43 +0000 UTC]

niceee

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JuliusX [2009-04-30 14:53:25 +0000 UTC]

the second one is pretty damn sexy. i can see this being really successful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to JuliusX [2009-04-30 15:36:22 +0000 UTC]

Sexy in what way? The design or the girls?

Thanks for the comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JuliusX In reply to Harm-Less [2009-04-30 15:38:59 +0000 UTC]

both

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BboyWicked [2009-04-30 14:37:17 +0000 UTC]

Pretty cool, the second one is nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

theinsidenoob [2009-04-30 14:10:15 +0000 UTC]

yep, blue one is better

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bratn [2009-04-30 14:01:39 +0000 UTC]

The second one is cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dot-next [2009-04-30 13:13:34 +0000 UTC]

Realy cool designs!
my personal fav is the second one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0