HOME | DD

JamesBardolph — Buried Treasure

Published: 2004-12-01 20:59:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 1624; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 173
Redirect to original
Description Banksy strikes again
Related content
Comments: 34

radiohat [2006-05-12 07:47:42 +0000 UTC]

and bansky always owns...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ajuk [2006-02-28 22:47:36 +0000 UTC]

Good to see he will still do the small stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Age2003 [2005-01-05 15:42:47 +0000 UTC]

omg liek i've seen this close up

I agree with ceri, i reckon we should dig

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

welder [2004-12-13 00:14:39 +0000 UTC]

I just love this shot. Great conglomeration of textures

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

peskaa [2004-12-10 22:06:58 +0000 UTC]

Ignore newk, he's just jealous of your er... tilt. >_>


The texture of the concrete and the contrast (gotta love contrast, my life blood) does it for me.



You gotta dig it up some day. I wanna know what is under there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rmpaul [2004-12-07 21:21:32 +0000 UTC]

'Fraid I havn't heard of this guy ... what's he do? Is there something actually in the sidewalk there?

Nice cropping job, BTW. (Assuming you cropped, of course.) Makes good use of the horizontal lines in the shot...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rmpaul In reply to rmpaul [2004-12-07 21:27:06 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I just caught your link up above. Very interesting stuff...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lostnpassion [2004-12-04 01:44:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fluxuspoem [2004-12-04 01:14:53 +0000 UTC]

heh very nice dear

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mikeydeboy [2004-12-03 12:06:28 +0000 UTC]

I like his work and always end up debating the morals of graffiti with myself... a huge can of worms just wating to be opened. do you see this as a documentary of his work, or a 'work of art' (for want of a better phrase... deviation?) by itself, incorporating someone elses?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to mikeydeboy [2004-12-04 06:08:46 +0000 UTC]

Well, I like to document his photography and give it a certain mood and sense of place, so I guess you could call it a documentary. I've e-mailed him links of all the photos i've done of his stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

trollholio [2004-12-02 20:48:25 +0000 UTC]

so go get your damn shovel already. I expect a percentage, of course. No, but seriously, this is an awesome shot. very urban.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flamsmark [2004-12-02 19:58:47 +0000 UTC]

banksy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to Flamsmark [2004-12-02 20:06:55 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Roxsquoggle [2004-12-02 12:16:05 +0000 UTC]

Love the variation in textures and the scattered leaves

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

newklear [2004-12-02 08:02:27 +0000 UTC]

That's a pretty cool shot indeed James, I'm liking the use of line and tone to build the shot rather than the typical ultratechnicalsuperindepth bullshit that normally gets attatched to such a photo by most. Really a nice feel you've given it, and kudos on capturing Banksy in fine form... been a long time since I've seen coverage


Only irk is the slant it's on, maybe if it were slightly less it'd hold slightly more appeal to me, but that's no biggy


Not bad, not bad at all, sir

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to newklear [2004-12-02 10:57:53 +0000 UTC]

I like the tilt! I think it gives it character!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

newklear In reply to JamesBardolph [2004-12-02 13:22:23 +0000 UTC]

It makes it look homo!


Really, the tilt although technically against the rules, is aesthesically appeasing, which is much more valuable at the end of the day I figure

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kittynn [2004-12-02 05:30:01 +0000 UTC]

Nice contrasty black and whites I like that the tones resemble a nice black and white film image - and you've got pretty nice midtones thrown in there too, which is awesome.

Like the slight angle too - not too tipped, but just enough for some extra interest. DIG IT UP!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ramonabegonia [2004-12-02 04:48:38 +0000 UTC]

sweet. nice angle. nice contrast. nice....treasure?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lugerman [2004-12-02 00:14:34 +0000 UTC]

AVAST!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to lugerman [2004-12-02 06:05:31 +0000 UTC]

AWHAT?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triggerfinger In reply to JamesBardolph [2004-12-02 09:04:10 +0000 UTC]

avast

it's a PIRATE TERM

kids

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JamesBardolph In reply to triggerfinger [2004-12-04 06:14:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lugerman In reply to triggerfinger [2004-12-02 11:39:20 +0000 UTC]

i am verry dissapointed in hakkypoohs now : <
i dont think i love him as much anymore D: nooooooooo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to lugerman [2004-12-04 06:14:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lugerman In reply to JamesBardolph [2004-12-05 17:50:49 +0000 UTC]

It's okay, i decided i still luff joo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pixiepain [2004-12-01 21:36:49 +0000 UTC]

AHH! where?! I wanna go check it out. I Banksy, he's good for a giggle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to pixiepain [2004-12-02 05:26:53 +0000 UTC]

Tooley st, opposite the pub near Tower Bridge Road

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chad-sparrow [2004-12-01 21:34:03 +0000 UTC]

man you found a banksy! you winning

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cei- [2004-12-01 21:11:06 +0000 UTC]

Wicked. Can we go dig it up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JamesBardolph In reply to cei- [2004-12-02 06:03:49 +0000 UTC]

Maybe we will find something Myria Hindley did in there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

peskaa In reply to JamesBardolph [2004-12-10 22:07:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

omnibladea7 [2004-12-01 21:08:19 +0000 UTC]

Dude... Dig there.


👍: 0 ⏩: 0