HOME | DD

jbobroony — Starship Size Refrence II

Published: 2013-12-08 18:17:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 11674; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 379
Redirect to original
Description Yet one more chart, this time with Vance's ships and some of mine from the Orion Press Lexicon Appendix books.

and many more too.... 

as always i used the tool kit from vance have a look  jaynz.trekships.org

and a big shout out to capshade, thanks again for ya help.

Related content
Comments: 17

Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-24 11:36:36 +0000 UTC]

Awesome work, love the addition of the ENT era design from Star Trek Legacy. I made some of my own ENT era designs if you're interested. 


majestic-msfc.deviantart.com/g…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-24 12:06:05 +0000 UTC]

Cheers, they are the best ships.

Well I have just had a look at your work mate and I can say, you have done some very fine work indeed.

I will take my time and enjoy, well done... am gonna have to up my game. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majestic-MSFC In reply to jbobroony [2014-01-24 23:42:15 +0000 UTC]

lol. My work is for computer gaming and so I can't always do exactly what I want. But I am glad you like it.


I have a few other designs not shown as I hadn't finished them, I have another Battlecruiser on par with the Yorktown (which I scaled to be 310 meters approx) and another cruiser similar is age and style to the Neptune. Plus a construction ship, freighter and scout (the later basically being the scout from Legacy but with some changes). I also have a heap of stations that I do need to finish up. But that unfortunately is a long way off, due to working on a TMP era project. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-25 10:55:04 +0000 UTC]

well i have to say i am waiting with baited breath, looking forward to seeing them mate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majestic-MSFC In reply to jbobroony [2014-01-25 23:20:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, they really only need to be textured. One of the ships was inspired by a friend from my webpage who I have known since oh 2004-5 I'd think it would be now. The other I mixed elements of different designs as I wanted a ship to still be less advanced than the TOS ships but feel as a tiny step forward on the Yorktown and Enterprise classes. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-26 08:22:58 +0000 UTC]

Cool, what website is it, Star trek?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majestic-MSFC In reply to jbobroony [2014-01-28 00:46:03 +0000 UTC]

It's a sci-fi and gaming forum. Currently registrations are closed as I need to do an upgrade in March. A lot of my work is there, well all of it actually. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-28 16:24:59 +0000 UTC]

Well if you don't mind dropping me a line when its up mate, that would be appreciated  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majestic-MSFC In reply to jbobroony [2014-01-29 09:05:00 +0000 UTC]

I'll be sure to remember. Probably March or April at this point. It will be a total revamp rather than just an update/upgrade. Just need to get over my summer first.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to Majestic-MSFC [2014-01-29 16:00:14 +0000 UTC]

cheers
Look forward to it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KaiserShipyards [2013-12-08 21:59:56 +0000 UTC]

the Perimeter Action Vessel Akule here was actually Akula in the Perimeter Action vessels book from 1992

and the lower sensor bit went down lower

otherwise good stuff here

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to KaiserShipyards [2013-12-09 18:29:49 +0000 UTC]

Always on the ball my friend, that's a typeo that has also made it into my book so thanks for spotting it.

i know about the sensor lol, i do not like it at all, its not in keeping with star trek i think.... so i changed it a little.

you can always down load and change it if you want, there's lots of different sources that i got these ship from i just cant remember them all.


i think am gonna do a chart with games ships on, like star fleet command or armada 

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaiserShipyards In reply to jbobroony [2013-12-09 22:31:22 +0000 UTC]

Yep its common mistake cus Akula was first that design but then Starfleet command games had a separate design also called Akula the 1 nacelle top and bottom Destroyer so some times it causes confusion if any does a chart with both designs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to KaiserShipyards [2013-12-09 22:41:03 +0000 UTC]

Ite a shame they don't look similar, you could say its a refit.
And there can't be two akula class. Big problem I think lol?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaiserShipyards In reply to jbobroony [2013-12-09 23:50:15 +0000 UTC]

nahh refit wouldnt work as Jaynz / Vance didnt do the Saucers for the Perimeter action ships right :

heres how they look:

www.strekschematics.utvinterne…

there technically smaller than Constitution Refit

Big problem indeed hence why some people use 1 or other in thier charts plus the Starfleet Command Akula is more well known

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jbobroony In reply to KaiserShipyards [2013-12-10 16:37:20 +0000 UTC]

yep the saucer didn't fit well with me on those plans, i like thing to look as if they are linear.


i like the command version more as well, so i think i will stick to it and there's a couple of refits to do

have you see the orion press PDF's = link www.orionpressfanzines.com/sta…

old but still cool.... lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaiserShipyards In reply to jbobroony [2013-12-10 23:14:52 +0000 UTC]

Yep i read them all on my tablet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0