HOME | DD
JoeyBlendhead — Industrial Scene WIP
#house #industrial #inside #interior #living #modern #room #wip #lounge
Published: 2015-03-21 17:19:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 326; Favourites: 4; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
And ALL SUGGESTIONS ON CAMERA PLACEMENT IS WELCOMED, but please know that I just threw the camera in with little thought, and it will change, one way or the other
Cycles
Blender 2.73
Alpha 3D
Related content
Comments: 56
It's a picture... And yes, cycles...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oooh, I like the aspect ratio that you chose for the camera. But what is that orange thing in the top-left corner?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The room is 20' tall, and the couch is 3' tall, and 6' long 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
20 feet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha! Industrial scenes have to be tall... It was once an industry
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The wall and floor looks great!
Stair material doesn't look that realistic.
Looks to me like the couch's surface is perfectly flat, so maybe put an indent/wrinkles?
Lastly, if I were you I'd try some DoF shots.
Looking great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha! I'll do DOF shots last...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh really? I'm on my laptop and it can have some crappy colors.
So probably yeah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha! Well, it don't matter now 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you want, I can do the full render for you. I have a 3.5ghz quad-core CPU (Phenom II), and my GPU is a GTX 650 Ti Boost.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha! Thank you so much for the offer 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You know, you might try the Adaptive Sampling patch by Lukas Stockner (one of blender's devs). What it does is it causes the render to detect when the remaining noise in a tile has crossed below a set threshold, and then will stop rendering that tile and move on to the next one. It's great because it allows the render process to spend less time on areas that don't need a whole lot of render time. It also has a setting called "Adaptive Distribution" that causes it to detect which areas in the tile have more noise, and then redistribute the samples to target the higher-noise areas. Quite often, when I do final renders with this patch, I'll set it to 95% confidence and then put the samples at something like 4096.
You can find the patch at the link below, though you'll likely need to compile it in order to use it:
developer.blender.org/D808
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Wow! This is an addon I actually wanted to recommend to the Blender Developers, but IT ALREADY EXISTS!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Um... Hod do I download/use it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's a patch, you'll need to download blender's source code, apply the patch, and compile it.
I think there's a link to a patched build in the thread on the BlenderArtists forum, though I don't know where it is: blenderartists.org/forum/showt…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Compile it? What's compiling? (I have no knowledge WHATSOEVER when it comes to coding)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'd search through that thread, then. Compiling is the process whereby a program's human-readable source code is translated to machine code.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your work is so outstanding, it makes me speechless, this looks like you took a photograph.
The lighting is realistic, as always, and the texturing is spot on!
I also love the wall texturing and modeling!!!!
and last but certainly not least, I like the little area of black, which looks like a great place for a picture!
As far as suggestions, The Stairs looks like it has a book shelve attached, I think you should add some random books, and trophies or whatever comes to mind
As for the couch, I must agree, I do not think it fits that area well, though the model does not suck; it looks real. But it throws the scene off a little.
Superb work Joey, I look intently forward to what you produce next!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That couch makes it seem like a huge room.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm deleteing it, and changing it for the one in my last scene... Maybe I'll make a new one soon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BTW, how many light bounces are you rendering with?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Probably too high then. In the Render settings panel, there's something that says "Light Paths". Turn the max/min bounces down from 8 to something like 6. Try not to go below 4 though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't like messing with that because it messes with the color too much
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I made a comparison here: sta.sh/01jmy4mfb0j8 As you can see, there's almost no difference between 6 bounces and 12 bounces. Curved objects with refractive shaders suffer some darkening, but you don't have any glass monkeys sitting around.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's fine and dandy... HOWEVER, my lighting goes through glass windows, which means my lighting will be darker...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The effect is only really noticeable on things like Suzanne.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't want to take a chance... Besides... I think I'm trashing this project :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It just don't look right.. The scale is all off, and the topology has a few ngons... I wouldn't buy it :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
While it is good to have mostly (if not all) quads, that's not the only thing that defines topology. You could have a sphere with the default options (32x16), and the topology would be bad. Turn all the triangles into quads, and the topology is still bad. All of those rings meet at the top, causing a huge vertex pole. It smooths horribly. It causes shading artifacts and pinching. Having a mesh with 100% quads doesn't matter if they meet and create 6+ edge poles. If the edge flow is terrible, having quads doesn't matter. People also seem to hate triangles too. Triangle actually smooth out fine. They're only bad if you need unobstructed edge flow, or if they're being deformed. A triangle in nature is the most rigid shape that there is. Think about it. It is physically impossible to change the shape of a triangle. If you had triangles in an animated human face, that would be very bad. If you had triangles in a static model of a lamp, would anyone care? It's the same for n-gons. They're only bad if you have them in an animated shape or if you need unobstructed edge flow. If someone is going to buy the couch, they won't buy it if it has awesome topology. They'll buy it because it looks good. Do you think someone is going to buy the couch so they can examine the topology? No. They'll buy it because it fits in the scene. Don't give up on the scene because the couches topology is wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The couch's topology is fine... It's the wall's topology. And If I ever we're to buy a model, and it had bad topology... I would immediately ask for a refund, and/or leave a bad review. If I'm making something to sell, I'm gonna make it as beautiful in edit mode, as it is in a render.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah. Personally, if I were going to buy a model, I'd consider 2 things: Does it look good? Does it match my scene? Then I'd buy it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha! XD I've had a lot of "beautiful" models denied because of topology on Blend Swap :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jeez, stop using cycle as your default render engine, or learn to use it correctly because that's not okay to have a test render that takes you more than 30 mins to perform. You would get exactly the same results using the blender render.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
The heck if I would... BI is gonna be DELETED soon from Blender because IT SUCKS!!! And I use Cycles correctly... My laptop is just really Slooooooooow!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I think he's using a laptop with a 1.7 GHZ processor. It's normal for it to be slow. Believe me, I had a computer like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reasons more to go for blender internal then.... (for test render, he can still opt for a long and laborious render engine for his final image)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Haha, BI is (contrary to popular belief) really slow. HDRs suck the life out of the thing. sta.sh/0m98epa8zvt That took a couple of hours to render in BI. And it doesn't even look good. BI really can't handle reflections, refractions, or HDRs. It can still be faster than cycles in most scenarios, but realism really kills it's speed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's why i said TEST render.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But blender internal isn't usable to produce realistic indoor scenarios. If you want photorealistic images you have to use cycles. With blender internal you would have to fake a lot of things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
| Next =>