HOME | DD

JoshuaDunlop β€” Charizard concepts pkmon evo

Published: 2007-06-16 20:30:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 10030; Favourites: 129; Downloads: 106
Redirect to original
Description Quick sketch with very quick colour, either there younger and older or maybe seperate regions. Or maybe ill scrap one, what do you think?

Hope you like um
Related content
Comments: 40

MrMegaMattX [2011-04-20 06:30:22 +0000 UTC]

It looks as if the top concept is female and the bottom one male. You're artwork and ideas of realistic pokemon are fantastic. I admire that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to MrMegaMattX [2011-04-20 07:37:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PokemanMILLION [2010-12-29 01:13:11 +0000 UTC]

Both heads, top body looks realistic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

magicwolfimp [2010-11-15 03:23:20 +0000 UTC]

no scrap it awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

timberwolf38 [2010-11-07 18:37:37 +0000 UTC]

maybe you should make the one on the botom the adult form of the charmander from 'birth of a new dawn'

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to timberwolf38 [2010-11-08 09:33:50 +0000 UTC]

wow those are old pictures, but yer maybe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jyejyebinks [2010-03-21 13:19:36 +0000 UTC]

i think defferent regions may be good. Different regions have different food chains, climates, scenery. So the different pokemon would have to adapt to survive their.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to jyejyebinks [2010-03-21 15:41:55 +0000 UTC]

yer your right,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

masterBT3000 [2010-02-10 15:35:07 +0000 UTC]

male and female varients.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to masterBT3000 [2010-02-10 16:04:21 +0000 UTC]

could be

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

masterBT3000 In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2010-02-10 18:32:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lady-Of-Ice-Chaos [2010-01-12 06:35:12 +0000 UTC]

Maybe male and female? In most reptilliods its the females that are bigger, in order to to produce larger, healthier cluches and be able to protect them. ^^ I rase and breed reptiles

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Lady-Of-Ice-Chaos [2010-01-12 10:13:52 +0000 UTC]

sounds cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nayialovecat [2009-10-19 21:27:09 +0000 UTC]

Overhead. Definitely.

But two different regions can have two different Charizard, neh? :3 It's nice idea...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to nayialovecat [2009-10-20 08:20:26 +0000 UTC]

They could its very possible

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nayialovecat In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2009-10-20 15:00:30 +0000 UTC]

original pokemons are... too simply :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Octoboy-the-8th [2009-08-10 21:27:28 +0000 UTC]

I quite honestly thought it was sexual dimorphism.

Pretty neat either way.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mgunh1 [2009-07-13 17:39:25 +0000 UTC]

I like the idea of regional differences. If you look at the Orange Islands season in the anime, the pokes there are often quite different from the main-land ones, even differing from island to island.
It would not be a stretch of the imagination to find a slightly different shaped or patterned Charazard, or any other pokemon, in some other region... or even a dwarf sub-specie on some isolated island.
If you can have a pygmy elephant, you can have differing regional pokemon. However, being flighted, I'd have to suggest that it be from a slightly more isolated region, like Hoenn or Sinnoh.
From an anatomical stand point, though, the top one looks like it would be the better flier - more streamlined and smaller.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to mgunh1 [2009-07-14 13:39:10 +0000 UTC]

yer, Δ± thΔ±nk Δ±ll have some wΔ±th a few dΔ±fferneces, charΔ±zards Δ± doubt would have many only because they can fly, meanΔ±ng they wouldnt be stuck Δ±n one place for the area to have an real sΔ±gnΔ±fΔ±cant changes to them

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

R-dragon [2007-09-19 02:18:08 +0000 UTC]

how about male and female. looks about right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to R-dragon [2007-09-20 06:41:05 +0000 UTC]

yer i was thinking that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

R-dragon In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2007-09-20 08:37:36 +0000 UTC]

tht or one from charlasific vally what ever that place is called were the charazad live and grow to be giants either way its your choice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to R-dragon [2007-09-21 18:46:29 +0000 UTC]

cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkdiaruga69 [2007-06-19 06:06:36 +0000 UTC]

They're frickin awesome. I absolutely luv them. I agree with the Male Female thing cos the top one does look more feminine. But I like the bottom one more cos it looks more evil then the top I am defiantly adding this to my faves

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Darkdiaruga69 [2007-06-19 09:02:06 +0000 UTC]

cool, its not the finalised peice, so dont worry bout it being sketchy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Darkdiaruga69 In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2007-06-19 11:20:08 +0000 UTC]

KK man, I know it's not the finalised one though lol but it's still awesome. Can't wait to see the finalised pic

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Renegade-Hamster [2007-06-17 05:18:12 +0000 UTC]

I like the bottom one better. It looks like a robust, terrifying monster, whereas the top one looks like a graceful plant eater. I think the key is in the shape of the torso, the angle of the back, and the size of the forelimbs.

The wings could be better. Try making it look like the wings have powerful muscles, rather than being stick-like appendages. The membrane could also be tighter and attached further up the back than where it is right now. If you want, you could make the wing colour blended, so it's not an unnatural looking contrast of orange to green.

Think about the thickness of the tail too. It looks too thick by a third to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Renegade-Hamster [2007-06-17 12:14:11 +0000 UTC]

Well with the wings i always have all my dragons membraines that far down because anything further up to that is physically impossible to fly (i know someone who works with microlights and kites). The wings are half folded so they woulndt be tight, and i see dragons as gliders, relying on air currents and not powered flight so their muscles wouldnt be huge though i agree these could go slightly bigger. The size of the forlimbs need to be slightly smaller both for flight and the fact that Charizards are bi-pedal animals. The blended natural colour is a good idea and ill take that into account. and yes i could make the tail slightly thinner for balance reasons. thanks for your comment, ill take them into consideration and i hope you understand why i have done certain things.

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Renegade-Hamster In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2007-06-17 12:21:55 +0000 UTC]

Cool.

I was talking from a design point of view on the wings, because something that large, heavy and un-aerodynamic couldn't possibly fly anyway, and would only have rudimentary wings for LOOKING COOL purposes. I like my wings skinnier.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Renegade-Hamster [2007-06-17 12:28:25 +0000 UTC]

fair enough but actually technacally they could fly if they were gliders, by closing their legs and arms close to their bodies and if their wings were big enough they could quite easily glide. Airodynamics is a strange thing, like a thing i found out is that a bumble bee technacally should be able to fly because its bodies too big compared to its wings but they still can. strange huh, but i do appreciate your input

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Renegade-Hamster In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2007-06-17 12:32:39 +0000 UTC]

I suppose the Charizard would have to leap off a cliff or something to get enough air to glide.

I think scientists are currently studying bee flight to see if our laws of aerodynamics need updating. So far, they think that the bee's wings create little vortices of air that create lift, rather than the plane of their wings creating lift.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

mgunh1 In reply to Renegade-Hamster [2009-07-13 17:52:14 +0000 UTC]

Que random science-guy.

That the laws of aerodynamics say the Bumble bee shouldn't fly is a myth.
There are two different sets of laws, one for AEROPLANES the other for HELICOPTERS.

Bumble Bees (and, indeed, all insects) are under the Helicopter laws as their wings act in a similar fashion. They generate lift by the movement of the WINGS, not the movement of the AIR as planes and most birds do(excluding the Hummingbird and certain types of Australian Lorikeets).

It is for this reason that no insect needs to run to lift off - no helicopter need to move either to gain lift. Both move their wings to generate a downward force and create an area of lesser pressure above them.

lanes and birds use the movement of air OVER their wings to cause a similar, opposite effect - the air pushes the wing up as it moves over the wing's shape.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Renegade-Hamster [2007-06-17 12:34:35 +0000 UTC]

i know crazy huh, yer they would need a hight to get the lift they needed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JoshuaDunlop In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2007-06-17 12:29:08 +0000 UTC]

should'nt be able to fly sorry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GoombaJoe [2007-06-17 01:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Very awesomeness Yeah, they do make me think of male and female...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to GoombaJoe [2007-06-17 12:14:55 +0000 UTC]

cool thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JoshuaDunlop [2007-06-16 21:43:20 +0000 UTC]

not neccercerally, if you think about it, in the games you can still catch pokemon from other regions in other regions there just rarer, so maybe?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

neakbit [2007-06-16 21:00:02 +0000 UTC]

I personally like the one on the top...though the male-female thing could work. I wouldn't do different regions though, because isn't it only from Kanto/Tohjo?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

watcher20 [2007-06-16 20:31:53 +0000 UTC]

perhaps male and female?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to watcher20 [2007-06-16 20:35:11 +0000 UTC]

yer maybe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0