HOME | DD

JoshuaDunlop β€” Leaping from the river water..

Published: 2010-04-24 19:59:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 15032; Favourites: 355; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description Magikarp are seen as one of the most useless pokemon known, and have no use in battle than as a distraction. Unable to learn even the most basic moves it simply splashes around limply.
It was once called to be de-classified as a pokemon but was overruled due to its evolution, Gyarados, one of the most powerful dragon/water type pokemon known.
High level Magikarp are searched for in hopes to evolve them quickly. They are occasionally farmed for this purpose.

Humans occasionally eat them however they are a very gristly fish and are full of bones, this is due to the fact it goes through such a large transformation when it evolves.

Saying all of this Magikarp are extremely resilient and have been found in both salt and fresh water and even some found near underwater volcanos.
Related content
Comments: 173

JoshuaDunlop In reply to ??? [2014-09-20 13:36:54 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thelakotanoid1 [2014-05-13 03:46:22 +0000 UTC]

i love magikarp c: and u make it look as majestic as his backstory ;u;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

psychonator17 [2013-06-27 17:16:21 +0000 UTC]

Even Magikarp looks cool in your style! Maybe it's because it doesn't have that derp face.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to psychonator17 [2013-06-28 07:00:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vulkabit [2013-01-17 22:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Lol magikarp look so happy XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Vulkabit [2013-01-18 13:03:59 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DivineHeir [2012-12-13 18:22:09 +0000 UTC]

Heeheehee, Magikarp in all it's glory!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to DivineHeir [2012-12-14 10:39:17 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Glitterizer [2012-09-02 23:57:52 +0000 UTC]

Are there both common animals and PokΓ©mon in your "PokΓ©mon Evo" canon?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Glitterizer [2012-09-03 07:16:59 +0000 UTC]

yes, but they are differnt to the animals in our world, similar but different, the pokemon that are based on the animals in our world replace ours if that makes sense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Glitterizer In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2012-09-03 21:18:03 +0000 UTC]

I think I get it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Arkkeeper [2012-08-21 05:56:55 +0000 UTC]

Gyarados is a Water/Flying type. the idea is that he's a Pseudo-Dragon. thus he doesn't get the type.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Arkkeeper [2012-08-21 22:39:48 +0000 UTC]

your very right, however in my pokemon universe, gyarados cant fly

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PyromaniacPyromancer [2011-06-11 02:52:27 +0000 UTC]

For a Poke'mon as nearly useless as Magikarp. You made it look a bit intimidating

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to PyromaniacPyromancer [2011-06-16 21:36:00 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shinwa-Tsuki [2011-05-17 00:33:11 +0000 UTC]

Very nice!

Is this Magikarp a shiny one?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Shinwa-Tsuki [2011-05-22 08:31:53 +0000 UTC]

nope a normal one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shinwa-Tsuki In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2011-05-22 15:23:03 +0000 UTC]

Ah, okay.

It was a bit difficult to tell.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pichu32 [2011-01-19 08:55:32 +0000 UTC]

magicarp ftw

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

snowflake-heart [2010-12-20 03:53:40 +0000 UTC]

Magikarp are underestimated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLonePower [2010-12-07 15:51:48 +0000 UTC]

I love magikarp. Like no other. Thank you much for this <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

oki-samickle [2010-08-03 17:51:39 +0000 UTC]

you make magicarp look cool unlike the actual artist XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to oki-samickle [2010-08-03 19:54:35 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Poison-Stripes [2010-07-16 17:52:14 +0000 UTC]

Ah, yes, one more thing (and sorry for adding another comment to this): Magikarp do learn the move Tackle at around level 15, I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Poison-Stripes [2010-07-17 12:36:50 +0000 UTC]

yer i heard that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Poison-Stripes [2010-07-16 17:51:33 +0000 UTC]

That actually makes really good sense for a Magikarp.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Poison-Stripes [2010-07-17 12:36:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Poison-Stripes In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2010-07-17 16:37:41 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bluepelt [2010-06-23 19:57:22 +0000 UTC]

looks good

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to bluepelt [2010-06-23 20:06:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bluepelt In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2010-06-23 22:11:01 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MadMonkeyDane [2010-05-04 12:47:04 +0000 UTC]

this guy is pretty much the best reason for getting an exp share otherwise they would never evolve

its a great pic shame its such a weak pokemon

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to MadMonkeyDane [2010-05-04 18:13:06 +0000 UTC]

lol thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MadMonkeyDane In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2010-05-04 19:24:30 +0000 UTC]

youre welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ani-Monster [2010-05-02 20:55:22 +0000 UTC]

Interesting that a creature could be classified or de-classified as a Pokemon. Would it then just be an animal? Wonderful work as always!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Ani-Monster [2010-05-02 21:37:39 +0000 UTC]

yes, technically...pokemon (in evo) are determined by their natural heal rates and abilities... pokemon can regenerate far faster than normal animals and are also aided by machines... meaning you can legally battle with them as they are far more resilient to harm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

uchihaguy [2010-05-01 22:54:49 +0000 UTC]

If only Magikarp WAS this pretty

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to uchihaguy [2010-05-01 23:56:37 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MooMinded [2010-05-01 11:49:21 +0000 UTC]

After I saw your Gyarados evo, I am really REALLY afraid of Magikarp right now... good magikarp, please don't kill me >_< *hides*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to MooMinded [2010-05-01 12:02:01 +0000 UTC]

lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yaujunmin [2010-04-30 10:46:26 +0000 UTC]

Before I got my Pokemon Blue,Red and Yellow,I always thought Gyarados could fly,because in one of the Pokemon Short Movies,a Gyarados was flying RIGHT UP a waterfall. Though it could have been using waterfall....

If Gyarados was Water/Dragon instead of Water/Flying,we would have a prototype-Palkia by R/G/B/Y. Shame they let Dragonite take all the glory. D:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkbite [2010-04-26 15:25:04 +0000 UTC]

SHINY MAGIKARP!! Grr... lol Look for those all the time. Great work! ^___^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Darkbite [2010-04-27 00:00:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Eriorguez [2010-04-26 10:41:51 +0000 UTC]

I'd say, that the reason Gyarados is Water/Flying and not Water/Dragon, is that in the first games, it'd be the next most broken thing after Mewtwo and Mew; as it'd effectively have no weakness (Dragon only had fixed damage Dragon Rage), and that, coupled with good stats (in the first games it could use Special attacks with good effect), and a massive movepool, well, that. Good thing it goes down with an electric move, otherwise, it'd be broken.

Also, based on the legend of the carp that leapt over an waterfall and became a dragon. And you can attribute the flying type to that, oriental dragons pretty much fly without wings or anything. Then there is the whole deal with Bounce being a flying move and Magikarp getting it, old Magikaps leaping over mountains, and Gyarados being able to also move in land ala snake...

And I like how this turned out, in any case!

(I like these 2 guys, that's why I went on and rambled like that, sorry! )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Eriorguez [2010-04-26 11:46:22 +0000 UTC]

no problem, i totally get why it was made a flying type in the first game, however it had a lot of bugs in those games, and much of pokemon isnt thought about realistically, so its my job to correct that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SUP3R-N3RD-B3N In reply to JoshuaDunlop [2010-04-26 21:38:27 +0000 UTC]

On that note, nice work. Funny thing, according to its Platinum 'Dex entry old ones can use Splash to leap up a waterfall. Still does nothing.

Random fact: although Magikarp is pretty much useless in battle, Sunkern has a lower base stat total.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to SUP3R-N3RD-B3N [2010-04-27 00:02:17 +0000 UTC]

cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Igike [2010-04-25 19:52:39 +0000 UTC]

I love it's pose! And your right it is very hard to evolve but when it does it's worth it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JoshuaDunlop In reply to Igike [2010-04-25 20:16:57 +0000 UTC]

true, glad you like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FakaPokeBio [2010-04-25 18:55:17 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing! The scrabbley linework just makes it seem more like guide or something too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>