HOME | DD
KuriMaster13 — YGO Custom card - Infernity Recruitment
#infernity #kurimaster13 #customcard #spellcard #yugioh #yugioh5ds
Published: 2020-05-17 14:15:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 1145; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Yeah, a couple more Infernity cards came to mind during some of those Kalin Kessler Raid duel events in Duel Links.... that should let you know hoe far back this was made. Anyway, here is the effect:--------------------------------------
Activate this card either by discarding one card from your hand or paying 1000 LP; Add 1 "Infernity" monster from your deck to your hand. You can only activate 1 "Infernity Recruitment" per turn.
--------------------------------------
So, yeah, the effect isn't that unique, though every Infernity deck would probably run 3 just because it helps them get to Archfiend easier. But the main thing about this is that you actually have 2 different ways to pay the cost of activating it. If you have a dead card in your hand.... and you want it gone because you are playing Infernities, you can ditch it to get you closer to being handless in the duel. But if you top deck this and have nothing to discard... because you are playing Infernities, you're fine, as long as you don't have under 1K LP.
What do you all think? Dose my multiple-choice-cost idea sound like something that could be in the game?
Related content
Comments: 4
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I like the idea of having 2 methods of paying the cost due to how the archetype works. While I don't play competitively or anything, I do have an Infernity-based deck that focuses on discarding, and I've mashed it with Fables and other cards that could theoretically "work" in the deck, so having an option for some effects would be pretty nice; plus, I'm sure this card would also be weaker for having 2 costs for its effect, albeit a choice between the two, since, even if you want to discard a card from your hand, I think it'd still be weak to cards that can negate cards that get you to pay LP or something (I remember that being a thing; I'm not 100% on all the rulings, so maybe I'm wrong on that); if I'm correct on it though, I'm saying it's good because it simultaneously gives it a strength and a weakness at the same time while working for the archetype it's supposed to be supporting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0