HOME | DD

madaigual β€” What a Complete Rotter

Published: 2016-01-19 15:19:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 1896; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 80
Redirect to original
Description

Remember chaps, don’t let the little ladyfolk stray too far from the parlour: the world is full of absolute blighters, all bally foreigners to boot!

(Had to break my own rules with this one: In addition to reflection I had to use the dreaded, and mostly useless, "specularity" setting. I prefer blurred reflection to specularity but unfortunately that blurred out the details on the brass....Ho hum! Nonetheless I managed to do a whole pic using only 4 different materials....And 20 bump maps)

Related content
Comments: 23

Phyl-CGI [2016-01-24 20:11:55 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic piece

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to Phyl-CGI [2016-01-24 22:45:23 +0000 UTC]

Basically "brass" and "alabaster" and bump maps, and it rendered extremely quickly (in just 5 or 6 minutes) .... I just have to continue experimenting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Phyl-CGI In reply to madaigual [2016-01-24 22:47:28 +0000 UTC]

Now that I have translated both words, I better understand

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to Phyl-CGI [2016-01-24 23:14:54 +0000 UTC]

Alabaster >>>> albΓ’tre (it must be a French word)
I was taught that the circonflexe "^" in French almost always becomes an "S" in English: CΓ΄te/Coast, ForΓͺt/Forest, Île/Isle, 2^4/SixteenΒ  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Phyl-CGI In reply to madaigual [2016-01-24 23:22:54 +0000 UTC]

Do you know that in old French, "forest" was used, instead of its actual version?
It's the case with most cases where in French you find nowadays "^" on vowels.
and yes: "albΓ’tre" is French

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Laspe [2016-01-20 20:57:07 +0000 UTC]

Super!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to Laspe [2016-01-24 22:23:25 +0000 UTC]

An interesting experiment to say the least! A picture that relies entirely on bump maps

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Laspe In reply to madaigual [2016-01-25 04:34:03 +0000 UTC]

Indeed! I was amazed yesterday when I read your description for this piece.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

phraught [2016-01-20 15:00:21 +0000 UTC]

I'm not gonna even attempt to jump into that discussion - ill equipped as I am! Β  Lovely, as always. Β  What a strange skin tone she has though (I suppose he does to, but I'm looking at her). Β  Almost blue - like she doesn't get out much.

I think the specularity worked out just fine. Β 

I've heard of having a pair of brass balls, but a trio of brass apples?

Cheers!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to phraught [2016-01-24 22:20:18 +0000 UTC]

Ah phraught....the strange "skin tone" was my attempt at a cheap polished alabaster I remember from many years back, a poor man's ivory if you will and usually found with brass. As a child I spent many a happy day rooting through London junk shops and jumble sales with my mother, who had a penchant for art nouveau/deco. My home was literally full of jingoistic trinkets from the Empire and the RajΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

phraught In reply to madaigual [2016-01-25 23:47:02 +0000 UTC]

Actually - alabaster is what I thought - so I see now - yup - I think you got it! Β Well done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

radaVid [2016-01-19 21:53:15 +0000 UTC]

Oh . . . a self portrait. cool.

kidding.


go Maggies!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to radaVid [2016-01-24 22:24:50 +0000 UTC]

So which one am I?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

radaVid In reply to madaigual [2016-01-25 14:22:57 +0000 UTC]

why, the foreign cad
of course.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blades-123 [2016-01-19 15:28:59 +0000 UTC]

I say! That's not cricket, wot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madaigual In reply to Blades-123 [2016-01-19 15:30:41 +0000 UTC]

He's an absolute shower!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Blades-123 In reply to madaigual [2016-01-19 15:35:52 +0000 UTC]

Not even the decency to offer the lady a cuppa. What a bounder!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tomokatu In reply to Blades-123 [2016-01-19 18:10:54 +0000 UTC]

Decidedly second-rate, By Jove!
(...and brass, too! Not a glint of gold anywhere.)

Damned poor show all round, eh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

madaigual In reply to Tomokatu [2016-01-19 18:37:43 +0000 UTC]

Indubitably so old bean!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tomokatu In reply to madaigual [2016-01-20 06:26:00 +0000 UTC]

Bounder would never be invited to join the club.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blades-123 In reply to Tomokatu [2016-01-19 18:37:30 +0000 UTC]

Quite so old boy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tomokatu In reply to Blades-123 [2016-01-20 06:27:08 +0000 UTC]

Just Not One of Our Kind, really. Not a sound chappie at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Blades-123 In reply to Tomokatu [2016-01-20 23:25:52 +0000 UTC]

Quite!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0