HOME | DD

madcomputerscientist — QDP, Digital woodland v1.0 by-nc-nd

Published: 2009-07-19 17:23:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 15485; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 17806
Redirect to original
Description New technique.
This is the base that I used for my new gradient digital camouflage. It's tile-able of course.

QDP= Quasi-synchronous Digital Pattern. Hard to explain. I'm gonna make a tut one of these days on these puppies.

Use for free, if you wish. Link plz.

'Download' for full 2000x2000px.

NEW version of this here: [link]
Related content
Comments: 13

DEAMONATOR [2014-04-29 13:55:09 +0000 UTC]

THEY LOOK AWESOME!! Are these pattern seamless?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to DEAMONATOR [2014-05-31 17:44:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again! Also, yes they are tileable.
I suggest v2.0 of the camo linked in the image description above, as I fixed a little flaw with the tile and colors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DEAMONATOR [2014-04-29 06:23:15 +0000 UTC]

NIIICE!!!!!! thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to DEAMONATOR [2014-05-31 17:42:24 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tounushi [2009-08-13 16:37:56 +0000 UTC]

Applied to uniform.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tounushi [2009-08-11 22:38:07 +0000 UTC]

What's the pixel ratio? Meaning pixels per inch or mms.
E.g. the CADPAT and derivatives is 10px/in.
Actually, what would the size of the tile be IRL?

Mind if I apply this to a BDU and put it in my gallery? You'll get full cred, of course.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to Tounushi [2009-08-13 06:46:10 +0000 UTC]

I would say that this one would have around the CADPAT standard PPI. The tile then would be about 20 inches across (roughly).
My gradient camo version of this pattern turned out to look better with a lot smaller PPI, but that's just the nature of that type of camo I suppose.

And I would not mind at all if you applied it to your uniform, to the contrary, I would be happy to see that! Thank you for having a look through my gallery, by the way, and I'm glad you found some things you liked.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tounushi In reply to madcomputerscientist [2009-08-13 12:39:28 +0000 UTC]

By PPI I meant the PPI of the pattern (meaning the size of the steps and pixels), not the PPI of the image. That's the beauty with storing pixel patterns on computer: you can have the pattern as a bitmap and then resize it with any PPI. My latest pattern is 300px high with the PPI of about 10 (actually 10 per 25mm).

Anyway, I already made the sheets with the IRL size as presented. The PPI is a bit less than 10, but I think the pattern will be more disruptive that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to Tounushi [2009-08-19 06:01:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I make mine a bit confusingly I suppose, as I end up with any number of real pixels representing the pattern's pixels, just due to the process I use. It's mandatory for some patterns to be like that, like pixelly patterns with different sized pixels, or gradient patterns, but I should really also find a way to get a 1:1 pixel ratio with the pattern's pixels for scaling's sake.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rrossouw [2009-07-22 18:09:00 +0000 UTC]

Hi MCS

This is showing some real promise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to rrossouw [2009-08-01 18:27:21 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad to hear so! It's good to find someone who appreciates this sort of thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rrossouw In reply to madcomputerscientist [2009-08-01 21:19:05 +0000 UTC]

Drop mail: riaan at wet test dot co dot za

Yeah, the company name is wettest.

In my private time I'm developing a new pattern for the SANDF.
I can share some info.

I can't wait to see the tut.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomputerscientist In reply to rrossouw [2009-08-05 03:00:49 +0000 UTC]

I shall send you a mail, and I'm working on the tut currently!
Thanks for your intrest, and I'm eager to hear more about your project.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0