HOME | DD
MarcusStarkiller β Tector Class Star Destroyer
Published: 2018-12-27 03:40:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 7950; Favourites: 126; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description
starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tectorβ¦Credit to for making the Imperial Class Star Destroyer which I omitted the main hangar bay from to make the Tector.
Related content
Comments: 22
Out of all the Star Destroyers, I like the Tector-Class the most as it is ship-of-the-line. (I.e. it is specifically designed for ship-to-ship combat.) Star Wars Wikia states that additional armour plating covered both hanger bays as well as the reactor ball, even though the reactor ball was physically absent from the model used in Return of the Jedi. It could be me, but I like to think the reactor itself was placed completely within the ship.
π: 0 β©: 1
The reactor was probably placed where the main hangar would have been located.
π: 0 β©: 1
Main hanger is towards the prow the ship. Propulsion is towards the stern. Doesn't make sense to place the main power source away from the engines. In a small machine such as a vehicle it would work but in aircraft, watercraft and spacecraft more power would be needed to transfer the fuel from the reactor to the engines. That's why the fuel on warships and spacecraft for nuclear reactors, diesel engines, aircraft fuel, etc are located towards the stern, near the engines.
π: 0 β©: 2
Well, perhaps the areas above the reactor in the Imperial I and Imperial II had been moved to where the main hangar would have been, had it been an Imperial I or II and as such, there would be room to bury the reactor within the hull fully.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wasn't the reactor ball also absent from this design?
π: 0 β©: 2
You are indeed correct.
π: 0 β©: 0
I see That Star Destroyer Whole Movie Battle Ever Seen
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed.
π: 0 β©: 0
this is one that the falcon passes over in the movie isnt it ?Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Nice if I remember correctly there was one of these at Endor named the Shockwave
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 0
Loving the level of detail in all of these, nice work
π: 0 β©: 1
is to thank. All I did was remove the hangar.
π: 0 β©: 0
Interesting...this one has escaped my notice all these yearsΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
yea, normally I am all over these variants, but its new for meΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0