HOME | DD

MichaelFaber — Repetitions to Happiness

Published: 2006-06-11 05:42:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 3679; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 670
Redirect to original
Description Made with Apophysis 2.04 beta
Related content
Comments: 42

thunder7 [2007-08-04 15:34:34 +0000 UTC]

very cool looks almost 3D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anjaleck [2007-07-23 04:08:40 +0000 UTC]

I would like to let you know I am featuring this in my latest journal. If you would like to have it removed, please let me know and I will removed it immediately. [link]

Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

neoweb [2006-09-05 22:27:50 +0000 UTC]

nicely done! it reminded me a little of Cosmos in my own gallery [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FlamingNuke [2006-08-31 03:39:48 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful use of fractals. Love the red center on the gray foreground.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LosDanloses [2006-06-12 22:31:48 +0000 UTC]

I love it. The subtle grey shades contrast nicely with the red center.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NatalieKelsey [2006-06-12 16:34:12 +0000 UTC]

I want to slide right down this...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tdierikx [2006-06-11 23:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Totally wikkid!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phoenix-22 [2006-06-11 22:07:25 +0000 UTC]

The quality of this render is superb, i'm really surprised there is no grain in it.

I think you could have gone with a bit brighter of a red center, just to highlight it, but its still a great fractal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Phoenix-22 [2006-06-12 06:29:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Matt, the quality setting was 3000. in the original png file, which is much larger, there is also no grain, so i was impressed too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phoenix-22 In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-12 15:31:10 +0000 UTC]

Wow, I usually have my quality set at 6000. Very impressive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Phoenix-22 [2006-06-12 20:06:23 +0000 UTC]

3000 is usually overkill. 6000 is really high!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phoenix-22 In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-13 19:38:01 +0000 UTC]

Well, usually I can choose to go with 1024 x 768 and an oversample of 2, or a bigger size with a lower oversample...so I up the quality quite a bit to compensate. Ideally I would render everything at 1600 and 2 oversample, then size it down later, but i've been unable to test that out.

I'll have to play around with render settings this week, as lower quality would improve render times.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Phoenix-22 [2006-06-14 04:21:29 +0000 UTC]

Hmm. Oversample actually compensates the quality automatically, so you shouldn't have to. unless you run out of memory, and you have to render in slices, the oversampled render time shouldn't be much more than without oversample.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pajokar [2006-06-11 21:36:23 +0000 UTC]

Amazing flame.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Asagohan [2006-06-11 18:00:03 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, a tornado with a cherry-flavored center!
Very well done. Ever consider making a tutorial? I want to learn your awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Asagohan [2006-06-11 20:12:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the support. I'm glad you like it. i have thought about making a tutorial, but have never gotten around to it yet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PauloCunha [2006-06-11 17:54:46 +0000 UTC]

Cool! Looking down a warped gun barrel?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to PauloCunha [2006-06-11 20:13:46 +0000 UTC]

I never saw it that way before, but that is an interesting view!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PauloCunha In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-12 00:16:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shamu200 [2006-06-11 16:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Very nice. Like moving through a wormhole towards the end of the universe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to shamu200 [2006-06-11 20:15:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the fav!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FRACTALngosneb [2006-06-11 16:37:36 +0000 UTC]

simplicity... damn youre good...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to FRACTALngosneb [2006-06-11 20:18:09 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KatamariMiracle [2006-06-11 15:18:08 +0000 UTC]

... It looks like the greatest slide of all time.

I have no idea why. -_-...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to KatamariMiracle [2006-06-11 20:19:53 +0000 UTC]

You go down first!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KatamariMiracle In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-11 21:30:02 +0000 UTC]

... Is that a good idea?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to KatamariMiracle [2006-06-11 21:39:05 +0000 UTC]

Probably not *pushesyou*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KatamariMiracle In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-11 23:00:39 +0000 UTC]

O_O

MAKE BETTER SLIIIIIIIIIDES!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lgmac [2006-06-11 12:42:50 +0000 UTC]

AMAZING and very unique. I like this one a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to lgmac [2006-06-11 20:20:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Lauren!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Arialgr [2006-06-11 12:26:25 +0000 UTC]

I like the way your eye is drawn deeper to find the color. Good work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WelshWench [2006-06-11 09:34:17 +0000 UTC]

Fantasic work The central area looks 3D as opposed to the surround which appears to be flat discs, and that "cut out" leading the eye into the red centre is perfect

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silvaris [2006-06-11 08:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Wow, it's lik the tunnel that Cloud goes through at the end of FF7, lol. Love the feeling of falling into the screen that it gives

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

agressive-cow [2006-06-11 07:05:40 +0000 UTC]

@__@!! GORGEOUS. You're so freaking awesome. I feel as though I'm spinning with it. @__@
Though. that light at the end of the tunnel doesn't seem so welcoming. XDDD;;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to agressive-cow [2006-06-11 20:32:43 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LaPurr [2006-06-11 06:41:18 +0000 UTC]

Interesting title...does that mean that happiness comes around again and again, or that we sometimes need to do the same things over and over before we arrive at happiness...Hmmm...

Regardless of what it means, I like this. It's much more simplistic than your recent images but deeper...if you will. The greys are soft and perhaps a bit bland, even with the highlights. They swirl and fold back on themsleves, ultimately leading my eye to the center...the red heart of this image. I can imagine that this is the happiness you refer to in the title. If I'm not completely mistaken, do I see a face in the center? A small, perfect face...

I'm ing this for itself and for the ambiguities and interpretations it elicits.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to LaPurr [2006-06-11 20:41:05 +0000 UTC]

I didn't put a face in there, and I don't even see it

I'm glad you like it, even if it is only for the title Thanks for the !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LaPurr In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-11 21:02:22 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't faved for the title.... Silly man...

Look just at the red spot...it looks like the left eye, nose and mouth of a face...honest!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to LaPurr [2006-06-12 01:24:18 +0000 UTC]

Haha! I see it now! I'm

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LaPurr In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-06-12 01:46:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

unHnu [2006-06-11 06:35:10 +0000 UTC]

This is very nice! I like the how the color is only there in the eye of it and the rest is grey.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nestalgica [2006-06-11 06:07:54 +0000 UTC]

Love the sense of motion Nicely done

👍: 0 ⏩: 0