HOME | DD

MichaelFaber — Resounding

Published: 2006-07-15 05:48:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 828; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 117
Redirect to original
Description Made with Apophysis

Something a little different from me. I hope you like it!
Related content
Comments: 35

zzzzra [2006-07-24 11:45:10 +0000 UTC]

Something new, but something really elegant !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to zzzzra [2006-07-25 06:52:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

beatlefreak [2006-07-19 22:36:03 +0000 UTC]

Very smootn and beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to beatlefreak [2006-07-21 05:36:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Robin!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

trystianity [2006-07-19 03:45:14 +0000 UTC]

I like it, the title is very fitting. It looks like communication in sound waves, and I like the desaturated smooth look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to trystianity [2006-07-19 05:50:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your kind comment Trystian!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

prediluvian [2006-07-17 04:57:50 +0000 UTC]

Very smooth. This is Phong-worthy. (www.phong.com) Nice one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to prediluvian [2006-07-19 06:12:15 +0000 UTC]

Cool! Phong was born and raised in the same province as me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

o-LJ-o [2006-07-16 22:55:32 +0000 UTC]

Just awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to o-LJ-o [2006-07-17 01:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Lisa

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

o-LJ-o In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-07-17 01:23:38 +0000 UTC]

elcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

o-LJ-o In reply to o-LJ-o [2006-07-17 01:25:09 +0000 UTC]

lol!...+w

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silvaris [2006-07-16 18:25:13 +0000 UTC]

Simple and effective. Very cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Silvaris [2006-07-17 01:22:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Asagohan [2006-07-16 06:11:58 +0000 UTC]

Make something less awesome so you don't fill up my favorites, please?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phoenix-22 [2006-07-15 19:32:40 +0000 UTC]

Its very nice and soft, great fractal!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Phoenix-22 [2006-07-16 07:29:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Matt!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lgmac [2006-07-15 18:49:09 +0000 UTC]

Love the grey tones. This is awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to lgmac [2006-07-16 07:40:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Lauren!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Keflan [2006-07-15 14:40:37 +0000 UTC]

Excellent

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KatamariMiracle [2006-07-15 12:22:05 +0000 UTC]

... It's like entering a different dimneion through the mirror or something! X_x...

It just looks so cool...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to KatamariMiracle [2006-07-16 07:41:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tdierikx [2006-07-15 09:47:24 +0000 UTC]

Way cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to tdierikx [2006-07-16 07:41:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Tracey!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LaPurr [2006-07-15 06:16:53 +0000 UTC]

Waves...light waves or sound waves...two different waves, coming from opposite directions...meeting an obstruction and bouncing back and around. Nicely and subtly dramatic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to LaPurr [2006-07-15 07:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Kat!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LaPurr In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-07-15 07:18:49 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cutt3r [2006-07-15 06:14:16 +0000 UTC]

again, these are beautiful and amazing, but how is this possible?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to cutt3r [2006-07-15 07:14:48 +0000 UTC]

It takes a lot of time to learn control. understanding how apophysis renders(chaos game) is a really big help too. after a lot of trial and error, i've found which variations mix well (no wispy junk), which ones are best on their own, and which ones suck for my style of flames.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cutt3r In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-07-15 07:43:29 +0000 UTC]

I see, interesting, thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nemopaice [2006-07-15 06:09:33 +0000 UTC]

Nice and clean. I could see this hanging up in an office somewhere.
Great job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to nemopaice [2006-07-15 06:59:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Nemo! I thought the same! The print should be approved soon

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nemopaice In reply to MichaelFaber [2006-07-15 18:49:22 +0000 UTC]

Cool.
Out of curiosity, I haven't talked to many people doing prints. And was wondering. (Cause I do have some printed in a gallery here in town) I do most of mine around 4500x3000 (as an example) I know this should make a good 5x7 print, If it is at around 600dpi. Is there an apo setting that I may have overlooked to set the dpi to 600 or .....?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to nemopaice [2006-07-16 07:40:29 +0000 UTC]

there really is no dpi setting for images on a computer. the computer only cares about the number of pixels. if you want a 5x7 @ 600 dpi then you want a 3000x4200 render. 300 dpi should be excellent quality though. as for my images, i mostly render at 5400x3600 to make a 36x24 image at 150 dpi.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

freehat704 [2006-07-15 05:49:27 +0000 UTC]

Great pic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0