HOME | DD

MichaelFaber — eJulia

Published: 2012-05-07 18:43:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 2852; Favourites: 53; Downloads: 96
Redirect to original
Description Another test render with a new variation pack. Still has a lot of work to go though.
Related content
Comments: 25

bryceguy72 [2015-10-24 09:40:47 +0000 UTC]

Good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marbrure [2013-06-29 00:05:56 +0000 UTC]

This one would make a nice stained-glass window.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractanimation [2012-06-13 20:08:20 +0000 UTC]

Great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Margot1942 [2012-05-09 13:42:47 +0000 UTC]

It is just wonderful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Margot1942 [2012-05-09 20:56:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zueuk [2012-05-08 18:15:34 +0000 UTC]

ooohhhh fractalness

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Zueuk [2012-05-09 01:22:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Peter!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyberxaos [2012-05-08 12:48:21 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful result! If it's slow it's worth the wait

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to cyberxaos [2012-05-09 01:22:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks CX!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dark-beam [2012-05-08 09:20:42 +0000 UTC]

Superfantastic creation!

Btw, here you find a book of math functions in C - seems to be good and uses approximations

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to dark-beam [2012-05-09 01:23:37 +0000 UTC]

It's a good thing math hasn't changed since the 80's

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dark-beam In reply to MichaelFaber [2012-05-09 08:02:47 +0000 UTC]

Math is eternal

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EvilBricks [2012-05-07 22:01:09 +0000 UTC]

Details are great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractal2cry [2012-05-07 20:27:26 +0000 UTC]

so we might get some new plugins??????????

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to fractal2cry [2012-05-07 22:03:14 +0000 UTC]

eventually

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fractal2cry In reply to MichaelFaber [2012-05-08 13:04:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deepbluerenegade [2012-05-07 20:18:37 +0000 UTC]

This makes my nerdy heart go pitter-patter. It is interesting how it looks like a printed circuit board.

Are the renders still extremely slow?

Molly : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to deepbluerenegade [2012-05-07 22:02:53 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it is slow. The code has an inverse hyperbolic cosine function which is slowing things way down. I'm not sure that there is much way around it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deepbluerenegade In reply to MichaelFaber [2012-05-08 03:48:38 +0000 UTC]

Could you figure out what the Taylor series expansion (about zero) is, maybe the 3rd or 4th order and use that as an approximation?

It is good enough for engineering grad school : D

Molly : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to deepbluerenegade [2012-05-09 01:20:49 +0000 UTC]

The approximation wasn't close enough. It wasn't much faster anyway though because it still had a log function. I did some other optimizations though and i'm 37% faster

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deepbluerenegade In reply to MichaelFaber [2012-05-09 15:56:13 +0000 UTC]

Interesting. I'm glad to hear you are making progress

Molly : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sragets [2012-05-07 19:17:17 +0000 UTC]

I think I like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to sragets [2012-05-07 22:03:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuicideBySafetyPin [2012-05-07 18:57:50 +0000 UTC]

it's gorgeous!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to SuicideBySafetyPin [2012-05-07 22:03:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Light!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0