HOME | DD
my-little-account — If it ever had
#sj #deviantart #socialjustice #stamp #word #sjw #socialjusticewarrior
Published: 2015-03-25 22:05:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 6282; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Gernerally it is supposed to mean any sort of tumblr leftist as it did in the beginning, but with the time I realized you can get called a "SJW" for any reason.- Do you support people having some human decency? You are a SJW.
- Are you LBGTQA+? And/or mentally ill? You are a SJW (no kidding I got labeled one solely for this reason).
- Are you against right-wing ideologies in any way, form or shape? You are a SJW.
- Are you pro-choice? You are a SJW.
- Do you find egalitarianism flawed and pointless despite not being yourself a right-winger? You are a SJW.
- Do you support animal welfare? You are a SJW.
- Do you support feminism? You are a SJW.
- Are you egalitarian but not right-wing? Don't care, you are a SJW anyway.
Bonus if people tell you "go back to tumblr" and such.
This word has probably as much meaning as "commie" and "liberal" nowadays.
Related content
Comments: 223
Yes
scontent-atl.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho…
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Where is the context on this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's been proven you people do support the ISIS. So it does have a context.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, because there is no context here on the user who said it and their political viewpoints. You basically pulled out of your ass "SJWs" and "we people" supported ISIS so once again congrats on proving my fucking point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If they don't support the ISIS, then why did they said "they don't kill women"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I did not say THIS person does not support ISIS. And the "SJWs" have nothing to do with this given you showed me a pic that does not prove your claims. God damn how is it possible you have no idea what you are talking about??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have no other pics of SJWs supporting them. And yes, SJWs has something to do with this crap.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sometimes I wonder if you are a troll because people are hardly that stupid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not a troll.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not surprised, and if they were in France, they should go in prison for saying this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree. I would laugh at my ass off if they went go in prison.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Same, they deserves it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jutice Warriors who support ISIS.. well, it's official, they are not decent human beings at all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They never have been.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's confirm what i thinking about them, SJWs are seriously the worst group of people i've ever seen..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Funny how this personn critic the anti-sjw with the definition "scumbags", SJWs deserves this definition after all they doing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know! We are not the ones who causes so many trouble. This is pretty funny for calling us scum.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anti-SjW are not scums at all, i haven't got trouble with them, i seen more SJW who complains about "white people" than ISIS or another monsters, that confirm their hypocrisy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yep. I don't see SJWs complaing about ISIS at all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Me either, never heard them compainning about these monsters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
All they care about is "bawww cishets" though I do agree with them cis straight people aren't oppressed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe they aren't oppressed, but they are not an exception for everything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They should tell that to all the homess they meet, for exemple.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You mean homeless right? If that is, I agree. Homeless people do need help.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't you get bored of missing the point on everything?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have a flawed understanding of what it means. It's not about what you believe; it's about how unnecessarily militant you are in expressing said beliefs.
It's not a term I would use, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe this is what you are actually trying to say: considering your disgusting stamp collections , I can see you do not want people in the SJ community being "unnecessarily militant" so that people like YOU can keep promoting disgusting things like these without any major inconvenience.
And before you say "ad hominem" I am not debating with you. I have already determined you are a piece of crap.
Many people who use it do not just use it towards the "militant" side of social justice, I already mentioned it. The term has no consistent meaning and people who use it unironically are likely shit. End of story.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nice try, but no. Whether you're "for" or "against" any sort of social issue, the people attacking others and creating conflict where conflict doesn't actually exist are a real annoyance. It doesn't matter what side you're on.
Also, you might want to try a stronger approach than the "edgy 12 year old" shtick. Being a dick to people who believe things differently from you is no way to get them to see things from your own point of view; it pushes them further away. It's a very ineffective strategy on any level.
All the best to you. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Being a "real annoyance" does not have too much to do here.
Actually "being a dick" (being vocally against injustice and denouncing shit that needs to be called out) does not push people away; it only pushes away the toxic people who believe their movement is as bad as what they are against and keeps the ones who know and care enough about this stuff. How do I know this? Because a lot, perhaps most of these people who you accuse of "being dicks" really aren't once you get to understand them. They can be dicks but they know what they are talking about.
Nah, your response is full of shit, would not be surprised you were a white straight guy. Better go to support artists who mock suicidal people along with those who make these stupid "how dare I be cis" and "anti-feminazi" stamps.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Woooooooow. I was about to agree with you on a lot of stuff but you just really pulled by definition of how sjw was supposed to be used with you saying that you wouldn't be surprised if they were a white straight guy. Which is what sjws (the bad definition) do. They tell people not to assume and then they go accuse or say they wouldn't be superprised if they were such and such when asking people not to assume what someone is right off the bat. But they go and do it because they don't like someone's oppinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, considering you only wanted to talk about the part where I said that, I do not care if you agree with me or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fair enough I suppose, but I think it is pretty shitty of someone to do that to anyone. I one time had a stamp if something something go get a sex change. I was told by someone to do something to it. I said I would change it up. Meaning I would fix it any everything, but they got really really mean after that. And I had just been rushed to the er. Well they made a mess of my comments. Offered me no constructive criticism on whether the stamp was better or not after fighting through medication to do what was asked like I said I would before they raged. To top it off they called me a cishet. They also ansisted that was an insult. Well technically it was because I wasn't. I am pansexual and genderquestioning. I handn't been through all of my old stamps and had been very polite up until that point. Once I just got invalidated and was still suffering from the affects of the medication and the pain shot because of backproblems I bawwed. That is why people shouldn't invalidate people like that, but people who say they are for sj speak against it yet do it all the time. You are only proving my point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hypocrite. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Whatever you say lmao.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow so you agree? This is too good. You just told someone to shut up and also asked about something very personal all in this thread. This is great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes as you can see I am muuuuuch worse than the opposite (the "anti-SJW") side.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually depending on the person you kind of are. /: You specifically asked someone about lying because they had certain info on their page. That wasn't okay, but I guess despite what your about me says you won't admit it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh please shut the fuck up. You can see in her fucking page how she has a gallery collection mocking suicide and another mocking Leelah Alcorn between other awful things. You can see her blaming "cisphobes" for being the worst thing that can happen to trans people and she has a stamp (that also says "from yours trully cis scum") making a mockery out of something that gets trans people killed (it is transphobia in case you were thinking about something else) to somehow show us "cisphobia" is just as bad. Oh not to mention how she's calling someone a wannabe trans in the same stamp.
Yet I am the bad one???
Even if that user is a trans woman it would not cross my mind someone as awful with other trans people and offensively ignorant about the matter (a matter that involves even her own life) was not possibly lying; especially considering it has been proven there are people who lie about being rape victims and such to invalidate what other people have to say (being one example Poppypicklesticks from Tumblr).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes I am well aware of that, but those weren't your given reasons. You mocked the fact they had male up there when she had said she was a trans woman. So yeah that is pretty bad. You apparently do not get the concept of being half out at all especially when you retorted with why couldn't she just have left it blank. Guess that means I'm not genderquestioning because I have it as female on my facebook account and not left blank because I'm half out too. You don't understand at all.
Never said they weren't bad. I don't agree with them on a lot of things, but I do find things I agree with them on too.
And I get that too, but I bet if it happened to you you'd be pretty upset. :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"but those weren't your given reasons. You mocked the fact they had male up there when she had said she was a trans woman"
Do I need to repeat myself?: "Even if that user is a trans woman it would not cross my mind someone as awful with other trans people and offensively ignorant about the matter (a matter that involves even her own life) was not possibly lying; especially considering it has been proven there are people who lie about being rape victims and such to invalidate what other people have to say."
I am seriously fucking tired that you people will only care about misgendering someone and such when it is someone you consider to be a "good trans" like this shitbag. If you are aware of that then why do you not call her out or something instead of acting like I am the wrong one? Ahhhh because you do not fucking care and you would rather be in their side. Yeah I thought so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The thing is people can be a certain way and still be ignorant. Hell there are poc that are racist to other poc. I see them all the time on devantart and have tried to reason with them.
Also, you assume that I've not called them out on something. I have called her out thank you very much, but just because someone does or says bad things doesn't mean once in a while they can be spot on. I've agreed with them at certain points too. But that doesn't mean I never call them out. I just did not to long ago called her out.
But just because someone says bad things doesn't mean you can't call out someone who is ''less bad'' too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>