HOME | DD
Notshurly — Lead to Gold Array Explained
by-nd
Published: 2010-06-06 20:06:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 19895; Favourites: 111; Downloads: 402
Redirect to original
Description
Once again, I have made another explanation to an Oh-So-Famous array! I think this should really help. And now that I look at it, its amazing how simple this array really is. Just nukes. That about it...Related content
Comments: 27
The thing I'm failing to understand in this array is the necessity of carbon. Is it used as a source of fuel that aims to help the transmutation proceed, or is it a means of collecting any unused subatomic particles and disposing of them safely? Additionally, how does lead break down into gold in the fission array? As lead is a pure element and would need to be broken down into its subatomic particles which would then be reformed in the correct quantities for gold through the fusion array. Is it just a way of shortening and simplifying the process by reducing the number of free particles in circulation of the system?
Other than that, the array makes perfect sense.
Edit - Another thought just occurred to me: wouldn't it technically be possible (albeit difficult) to create an array that achieved the transmuting of gold from the subatomic particles of atoms in the air? I do realise that the quantity of atoms required would far exceed that required in the current array, and that if used in an enclosed space could use up so much that the person activating the array may suffocate, but the question still stands: would it be possible?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hey what language is that inside the transmutation circle and what does it translate as?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The language is an old cipher of mine. I had not, nor have I yet, found a good alchemical text that looks great, and at the time, I had just used a cipher
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I translate mine into Latin...tough to do accurately, but it adds that sweet esoteric feel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WOW. oh, i have another suggestion for your book. You should explain first the principles of alchemy and rectify some wrong assumptions about the science. Also, you could tie in the principles of equivalent exchange and the law of conservation of matter. Also how alchemy ties into teachings like kabbalah in that they each the " all is one, one is all" thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Already done. But with equivalent exchange, its really just the conservation of matter more than anything. Anything beyond that is in theory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oops.... Thanks for telling me!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ya know, if anyone and everyone could create gold and diamonds, and anything really, then nothing would be of any real value, so what would be the standard for world currency? D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Actually, diamonds would be even easier than this. Notshurly should iron out symbolism for pressure, then it would just take a lot of heat, and any source of carbon.
Just think about it. You could also do the same with Iron thrown into the mix. Super high carbon steel that's literally enmeshed with diamonds...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I reiterate, what would be the standard for currency then??? D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I know this reply is almost 10 years old but around the world many have already dropped the gold and/or diamond standard for money. It's called the petrodollar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
time. You can't artificially create it, and therefor, it becomes the only standard you have. It also prevents situations where you don't have any currency, because you can just work for whatever it is. Or borrow a few hours from a friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well then so much for Hot 'n Ready pizza from Little Caesars. :T
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol. You give us thirty minutes, and you can have the pizza that will take you ten to eat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yay we'll go back to the times when you worked for your food instead of working for a monetary substitute which you trade in for food! DOWN WITH MCDONALDS, UP WITH REASON!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I dont care. Gold is amazing! Its the best electrical conductor and can convert heat into electricity! Its awesome! Gold gold gold!!!! I dont care about its value
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
I just thought that i would point out that silver is actually a better electrical conductor than gold, though gold i more stable
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thus, gold is better. Sure, silver conducts better, but it cant last without tarnishing, thus making gold the better option.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Actually, although gold is really good at conducting electricity, silver is the best electrical conductor. It's just that since silver tarnishes when it's exposed to air, it's not very practical.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OOoooh yeah! Who cares if the worlds economy collapses, get what you need from alchemy! Duh! Why did I not think of that before?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like the idea of equivilant exchange. You pay with matter. In a world of alchemy, we can build anything we want! We just need meterial. So screw currency, just go with matter. You can get icecream from a pile of dirt. Yay!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And cotton candy. >w<
*AND COOKIEZ*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I like the way you think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The problem is though, in a world where alchemy is used for everything, it would be child's play to kill someone and them dispose of any evidence. You would just de-construct the body to atoms. Weapons also. I mean, an array for a fission explosion (nuke) could be in virtually anything. Forget backpack nuke, meet the notepad nuke.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
An interesting concept. I think designing a fission or fusion bomb array would be a cool idea. Just fortunate that none of this actually works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0