HOME | DD

#cruiser #explorer #fanart #ortho #overview #sgc #capitalship #stargatecommand #stargateatlantisfanart #sciencecruiser #battlestargalactica #military #sciencefiction #scifi #stargate #stargateatlantis #vehicle #vehicledesign #militarysciencefiction #crossoverfanart #stargatefanart #battlestargalacticafanart #battlestargalacticastargate
Published: 2021-03-05 08:05:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 11015; Favourites: 85; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Icarus-Class:
Affiliation: Intergalactic Union of Sovereign Planets/ United Space Operations Command(USOC), Intergalactic Marine Corps(IMC)
Typ: Heavy Cruiser
Number: N/A
Length: 738,74 m
Width: 457 m
Height: 131,46 m
Engine unit(s):
Sublight engine: Tech Con SAH-13 ion drive
Hyperdrive: Tech Con LRSS 1348
Hyperdrive system: intergalactic
Shield System: Union Arms Asgard Shield Mk 9
Armament:
4x Union Arms S-85 “Tomb” Standard Asgard Beam Emitter
10xUnion Arms E3I21LRE “Roaring Thunder” Asgard Pulse Ion Cannon, cal. 180 mm
7x Es'audil Solutions GAS-2603 SJ Very Heavy Staff Cannon cal. 1400 mm (Three-gun turret)
10x Es'audil Solutions GAS-2601 D Light Staff Cannon cal. 300 mm
10x Halevi Corp. SAPWCP-3H „Paragon“ Self-Propelled Heavy Rail Gun cal. 250 mm
6x Halevi Corp. CIRG-1414 „Bush Fire“ CIWS
6x BMT REMS-46 Ancient-Drone launcher (22 drones per launcher + 22 drones reserve per launcher = a total of 264 drones)
20x Vertical Launcher Systems (Equipped per cell with: a single Halevi Corp. IM-D-FW interplanetary missiles or with slide-in starter container with 9x BMT Ancient Drone Mk III each)
Complement (maximum): a half squadron (8) F-302 or UCV-304
Standard Complement: 4x F-302δ/D Aerospace Fighter
4x F-302ε/B Space Superiority Fighter/Interceptor
Cargo Capacity:
Role:
deep space patrol
deep space escort
deep space exploration (especially the DSC-308 sub-class, limited also the HC-308 standard version)
heavy reconnaissance
command ships for task forces
high precision planetary bombardment
fighting enemy forces
protection of trade routes
performing special missions
support for allied units (space and planetary)
support of battleship-carriers (only ships of IMC)
break through enemy lines
outmaneuver the enemy
strikes against main tactical and strategic targets
Cargo Capacity: -
Specificity:
second true Tau'ri space capital ship
originally developed to give the Tau'ri fleet, at that time consisting only of Teldy-Class corvettes, Vaselov-Class destroyers, Rya’C-Class carrier-destroyer and Daedalus-Class battle cruisers, a powerful weapon platform without having to build a full-fledged battleship
to keep costs down, as many elements of the Daedalus-Class as possible were adopted during development
thus, the Icarus-Class is technically more or less the Daedalus-Class, which is slightly extended (6%)
but, due to a completely changed deck structure, as well as the saving of 50% of the fighters, the Icarus-Class has space for a much stronger armor, better shields and more large turrets
since both ships have the same engine system, the Icarus-Class is significantly less maneuverable than the Daedalus-Class and has a lower sublight acceleration
so, in the 330 years in which this class of ships existed, several sub-classes of the Ikarus-Class were built, but unlike the Daedalus-Class, not a single freighter / transporter version (statement does not take into account one-of-a-kind pieces)
as already mentioned, the Daedalus-Class and Icarus-Class have been the backbone of the USOC in every respect for 330 years
because in contrast to all other known fleets, with the exception of the LDPD of the Lucian Alliance, the tactical and strategic measures of the USOC are based on the cruisers instead of the battleships
so it is not the cruiser's job to flank the Allied battleships, to escort them and to protect them in battle
rather, it is the task of the battleships to support the advance of the cruisers with long-range artillery fire
the aim is to bring the cruisers close to the enemy so that they can fire at the enemy directly with maximum accuracy and strength
meanwhile they are supported and protected by destroyers, frigates and corvettes
the two cruisers complement each other perfectly in their tasks
the Daedalus-Class uses its excellent maneuverability and acceleration for a ship of this size to outmaneuver the enemy and to push the enemy towards the Icarus-Class like a hunting dog chasing the loot towards the hunter
the Icarus-Class generally aids the Daedalus-Class maneuvers with additional firepower and serves as a backing, which protects the battle cruiser in an emergency with strong defense capacities
whenever possible, a Daedalus-Class and an Icarus-Class work together and can complement each other, which is why this combination is also known as the "sword and shield" of the IUSP
(Note: In contrast to Star Trek, where the Enterprise likes to be "the only ship from Starfleet in the quadrant", USOC ships are never allowed to operate alone, but always within a group with at least one other ship. The rule, however, is the work in a group of at least five capital ships (a flight))
-----------------------------------------------
Model made in: Sketchup
Model: me
Related content
Comments: 21
Kevinwinner [2021-04-17 03:40:04 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Kevinwinner [2021-04-17 05:58:17 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Kevinwinner In reply to Okwa [2021-04-18 23:38:41 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Kevinwinner [2021-04-19 06:04:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
Kevinwinner In reply to Okwa [2024-06-26 06:54:13 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Kevinwinner [2024-06-26 13:38:32 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Kevinwinner In reply to Okwa [2024-06-26 16:30:41 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Kevinwinner [2024-06-26 17:37:34 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Kevinwinner In reply to Okwa [2021-04-19 19:31:15 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Eaglestorm27 [2021-03-09 07:33:29 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Eaglestorm27 [2021-03-09 09:58:35 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eaglestorm27 In reply to Okwa [2021-03-09 11:40:40 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Eaglestorm27 [2021-03-09 13:58:37 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eaglestorm27 In reply to Okwa [2021-03-09 14:33:20 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okwa In reply to Eaglestorm27 [2021-03-09 15:55:40 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jayburn00 [2021-03-05 20:38:00 +0000 UTC]
Lots of redundancies in this design. To be honest, perhaps too many even (though backup systems are nice). Why staff weapons though?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jayburn00 In reply to Okwa [2021-03-08 19:54:28 +0000 UTC]
Too much redundancy means increased routine maintenance (so you are right about it having lower deployment time, less flight time). Sometimes, increased redundancy is not worth the problems it can cause, as it dramatically increases cost, complexity, etc, with a diminishing rate of return (the advantage being having backups). There are ways of scientifically measuring whether the disadvantages are worth it in this context: some of it is called risk management framework, other elements include average maintenance time (how long maintenance takes), mean time between repairs (average time between things needing to be fixed), and operational ready rate/mission ready time( how much percent of the time it is able to be used over its lifetime), just to name a few. These values can also be used to calculate a good estimate of how many replacement parts one needs to have stored for a specific component. This also allows a good estimate to be made of lifetime costs. What I'm getting at is that the ship might not be suitable for production due to high life cycle costs.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
jayburn00 In reply to Okwa [2021-03-09 21:18:57 +0000 UTC]
Huh, that German sci-fi sounds interesting. What is it called?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1