HOME | DD
OmicronPhi — Titoist Bullshit
Published: 2014-09-12 15:26:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 2568; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description
An eye for an eye, ."Inspired" by this: deltahd.deviantart.com/art/Yug…
Related content
Comments: 18
Away with you! Titoism is the greatest form of Socialism to ever exist! You're just jealous of how successful SFR Yugoslavia was!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I support Tito and SFR Yugoslavia and am a proud titoist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tito > Kims, Mao, and Stalin
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Here's a further attempt to annoy DeltaHD: mylittletripod.deviantart.com/…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Excuse me, since I'm rather unknowing about Titoism but why the hate exactly? I'm not defending him or DeltaHD I just would like to know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tito maintained good relations with neo-liberal imperialist countries and had a typically economically shit full of state tyranny state socialist regime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow you anarchists sure are stupid. You call yourselves communists but you know nothing about it. All you want is to go wreck stuff up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I'm not even a communist but we can both agree these anarchist are batshit insane and will most likely be gobbled up by their own revoultion. Kinda like Robespierre in the French revolution. ~ C
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"Wow you anarchists sure are stupid."
Because we criticized Tito?How's about having an actual argument in his defense instead of a baseless insult.
"You call yourselves communists but you know nothing about it."
Actually we do, it's just that we don't believe that it can be obtained through an Authoritarian Vanguard Party State, due to the fact that it is based upon a false assumption. It is based on the assumption that power does not corrupt (the antithesis of which all socialism relies upon). It is an interesting position, as it is so fantastically contradictory; if power did, indeed, not corrupt, capitalism would not be a problem. How would this system work, exactly; voting is clearly out of the question; they have, much like us, seen the dangers of representative democracy, and do not wish to see them again. They know that if voting is reinitiated, the bourgeoisie will immediately rise to power again, so they need another way to keep the state alive; to perpetuate its existence (because anarchy is just a tiny bit too radical for them), so what do they do? Well, after the revolution a, so-called, dictatorship of the proletariat is put into effect; already we've a problem. The purpose of this "dictatorship" is to empower the people, and disempower the elite; the dictatorship of the proletariat is supposed to function under Marxist principles and then slowly dismantle, but the problem is that if you give a small group of people a large amount of power, this power will, inevitably, be abused, and thusly the dictatorship of the proletariat becomes a dictatorship over the proletariat. Just look at many former Marxist-Leninist States and "Animal Farm" by George Orwell,a Democratic Socialist who intended his novel for his Colleagues that supported the USSR and cited it as a shining Hall-Mark of Socialism
"All you want is to go wreck stuff up."
It is here that you display your complete ignorance of Anarchism, by trying to use a Strawman that can be easily Debunked not only by actually reading into the Works of Notable Anarchist Philosophers such as Emma Goldman( ucblibrary3.berkeley.edu/Goldm… ) Peter Kropotkin ( dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_… ) and Mikhail Bakunin(anarchism.pageabode.com/anarch… , But also by looking at notable examples of Anarchism being put into practice, such as The Spanish Revolution of 1936 (Which was ironically far more successful at creating a Workers Paradise than the USSR itself), and even more modern Anarchist communes like Freetown Christiania in Copenhagen, Denmark. Hell, I'll just leave another piece by George Orwell on the Spanish Revolution when he was fighting in the Civil War on the P.O.U.M (a Trotskyist group that was allied with the Anarchist CNT.) right here from his book "Homage to Catalonia":
"It was the first time that I had ever been in a town where the working class was in the saddle. Practically every building of any size had been seized by the workers and was draped with red flags or with the red and black flag of the Anarchists; every wall was scrawled with the hammer and sickle and with the initials of the revolutionary parties; almost every church had been gutted and its images burnt. Churches here and there were being systematically demolished by gangs of workmen. Every shop and cafe had an inscription saying that it had been collectivised; even the bootblacks had been collectivised and their boxes painted red and black. Waiters and shop-walkers looked you in the face and treated you as an equal... There were no private motor-cars, they had all been commandeered, and all the trams and taxis and much of the other transport were painted red and black... Down the Ramblas, the wide central artery of the town where crowds of people streamed constantly to and fro, the loudspeakers were bellowing revolutionary songs all day and far into the night. And it was the aspect of the crowds that was the queerest thing of all. In outward appearance it was a town in which the wealthy classes had practically ceased to exist... Practically everyone wore rough working-class clothes, or blue overalls, or some variant of the militia uniform. All this was queer and moving. There was much in it that I did not understand, in some ways I did not even like it, but I recognised it immediately as a state of affairs worth fighting for. Also I believed that things were as they appeared, that this was really a workers' state and that the entire bourgeoisie had either fled, been killed, or voluntarily come over to the workers' side; I did not realise that great numbers of well-to-do bourgeois were simply lying low and disguising themselves as proletarians for the time being."
"There is a sense in which it would be true to say that one was experiencing a foretaste of Socialism, by which I mean that the prevailing mental atmosphere was that of Socialism. Many of the normal motives of civilised life--snobbishness, money-grubbing, fear of the boss, etc--had simply ceased to exist. The ordinary class-division of society had disappeared to an extent that is almost unthinkable in the money-tainted air of England... to the vast majority of people Socialism means a classless society, or it means nothing at all. And it was here that those few months in the militia were valuable to me. For the Spanish militias, while they lasted, were a sort of microcosm of a classless society... The effect was to make my desire to see Socialism established much more actual than it had been before."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0