HOME | DD
Patchi1995 β Triceratops vs. Anatosaurus
#anatosaurus #anatotitan #patchi1995 #ceratopsian #torosaurus #ornithischian
Published: 2014-02-02 18:50:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 7672; Favourites: 71; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
Update #1: For 5 years, I have renamed my very first deviation since I made my first appearance as a DeviantArtist, from Triceratops vs. Edmontotitan, into Triceratops vs. Anatosaurus, because Edmontotitan is Edmontosaurus regalis, while Anatosaurus is Edmontosaurus annectens/Anatotitan copei.This was the All-Yesterdays thing, the ferocious Triceratops is the largest , but the last of the 3 heterodontosauroformes, which along with Pachycephalosaurus and Leptoceratops. Triceratops tried to kill the male Anatosaurus. But the Anatosaurus stallion used his cheetah-reflexes as he dodges Triceratops's dreaded bite, while the mare watched the battle of 2 giants.
Triceratops was the entelodonts of the dinosaurs, whose along with its fellow ceratopsians of its family tree.
Art (C) Me, Patchi1995 Β
Related content
Comments: 101
1. Yes I believe that!
2. That's good.
3. What you mean W.T.F?!
π: 0 β©: 1
Moral is, all your points aren't valid nor proven.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh, noooo! Stygimoloch skulls bigger than Pachy-skulls were found!
And Triceratops didn't have crest holes!
Do not always copy every theory of scientists like Horner, you should also think about it to develop your own (perhaps even better)Β theories.
But, yes. Nanotyrannus was a young T. rex and Anatotitan was (surprise) a big specimen of Edmontosaurus.
Ba-dush! XD
π: 0 β©: 1
I think you are almost wrong, because the big species of Pachycephalosaurus's skull was bigger than the little Pachycephalosaurus and Stygimoloch's skull. But you're right about the skulls of Triceratops, some of them don' have holes on their skulls, and I gotta do my own theories! It's a ba-dush.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ba-da-dush.
I meant, the smallest Pachycephalosaurus skull was way smaller, than the biggest Stygimoloch skull. Shure, there could be some variation between distinct genera or one genera, but it wouldn't make it the same species.
It's not just about the nose ornament structure.
This was only the case for T. horridus, where it was thought, there were many species, but the ones with the spikey frill were just adolescents and juveniles.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nah, TorosaurusΒ is still a separate genus.
AnatotitanΒ was the juvenile genus of Edmontosaurus.
π: 0 β©: 1
If this is the case, shouldn't you be calling them Toroceratops, Nanotyrannosaurus and Pachydracomoloch?
Also, no dinosaur documentary can be used as an accurate resource, particularly not those which only contain the theories of one or two people.
π: 0 β©: 1
In this case Jack Horner.
The mind behind the scientifically incorrect dinosaur designs for Jurassic Park.
π: 0 β©: 0
Why is it named Edmontotitan when Edmontosaurus is the real name?
π: 0 β©: 1
Because Anatotitan was named into Anatosaurus, that's why!
π: 0 β©: 2
Taxonomy doesn't work like that.Submit Comment
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, you're right. Would be bullocks.
π: 0 β©: 0
Which are both synonyms with Edmontosaurus.
π: 0 β©: 1
uhh.... I mean Edmontosaurus!
π: 0 β©: 0
Edmontosaurus
π: 0 β©: 0
Why would Triceratops want to kill a hadrosaur?
π: 0 β©: 2
Probably would have been better to set this during the Extinction Event IMO
π: 0 β©: 0
Because ceratopsians and the marginocephalians, like pachycephalosaurs and heterodontosaurs, were all omnivores. Omnivorous marginocephalians can have a various diet of plants, fruits, insects, live animals, and dead animals.
π: 0 β©: 2
I think it's a bit of a stretch to infer that Ceratopsia was all omnivorous just because of one Psittacosaurus fossil had lizard bones in its stomach. For all we know, ceratopsians could have evolved into derived herbivores after that rather basal representative of their lineage.
π: 0 β©: 0
True, but would Triceratops actively prey on big herbivores?
π: 0 β©: 1
I would have thought it just scavenged, or ate some small prey. It doesn't look likean apex predator.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know! That's why Hell Creek had 2 apex predators like Tyrannosaurus Rex, and a rogue Triceratops. They can battle for 1 room of being an apex predator.
π: 0 β©: 1
i would not talk to morlok if i were youΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Can you guys draw this picture in your style?Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Whoa!!
I'm never heard about the new name for Edmontotitan, but wait, is that name means "Edmonton Titan" or the "Giant from Edmonton?"
Because I have a rare feelings about new name's changed.
π: 0 β©: 1
The name Edmontotitan was made by me. It should be renamed from Edmontosaurus. Yes, Edmontotitan is meaning "Giant from Edmonton."
π: 0 β©: 3
I could have sworn I herd this before
π: 0 β©: 2
You mispelled "heard."
π: 0 β©: 1
Because Anatotitan was known as Anatosaurus. That's why I should rename Edmontosaurus into Edmontotitan, while Anatotitan into Anatosaurus!
π: 0 β©: 2
Edmontotitan does not exist as a name. Edmontosaurus is the valid name.
π: 0 β©: 0
That's not how Taxonomy works...
π: 0 β©: 1
Very Nice!Β It's nice to show the dark side to herbivores once in a while.
π: 0 β©: 0
This was the 1st drawing submitted to deviantart.
Is Triceratops tried to eat the stallion Edmontotitan, or is he fighting with him?
π: 0 β©: 0