HOME | DD

RichardLeach — Broken yes

Published: 2011-09-29 01:02:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 746; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I'm posting some of my notebook pieces tonight. Not that different from my "regular" work but perhaps a bit.

Kindly featured by [link]
Related content

RichardLeach - O speak

RichardLeach - vowels

RichardLeach - You

RichardLeach - beyond what

RichardLeach - until I was sure

RichardLeach - See Re

RichardLeach - if What

RichardLeach - A 1 and 2

RichardLeach - could be

Vaultingsier - Inferno inhabitants

passiiq - The math behind the words. [🤖]

meramora - Blind to Reality Conceptual Digital Portrait

meramora - Blind to Reality Conceptual Digital Portrait

VitoriaA-4Art - Forced Departure [🤖]

RedFoxArts - Color Shift Horizons [🤖]

Valarhin - The Esoteric Waltz of Prestige [🤖]

Pharcryfromhome - Time-Bound Oracle 2 [🤖]

Izaaaaa - the form of

ecezeber - 012

likeatinglass - whatgoesup..

steve2727 - Love fell on my heaD

rainbowlullaby - l'amour . ...

AlisaroMarzun - Conversa en equilibri

spoudastis - collage journal2

ShigeoSatoh - 'rain' moleskine

LauraTringaliHolmes - Playing Cards with Richard 1
Comments: 45

Markus43 [2011-11-18 21:24:18 +0000 UTC]

FEatured here: [link] thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to Markus43 [2011-11-18 22:43:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Markus43 [2011-11-08 20:55:33 +0000 UTC]

there is song in this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to Markus43 [2011-11-09 02:01:34 +0000 UTC]

I love that comment, Mark, thanks so much

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Markus43 In reply to RichardLeach [2011-11-10 20:49:09 +0000 UTC]

the idea of broken promises and the wisdom of not promising anything, but letting our yes mean just that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to Markus43 [2011-11-10 22:24:19 +0000 UTC]

mm-hmm - "let your yes be yes and your no be no" as the man said one time

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LancelotPrice [2011-10-23 19:09:32 +0000 UTC]

Qualification always breaks something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to LancelotPrice [2011-10-24 18:53:54 +0000 UTC]

A harsher process than it's cracked up to be sometimes...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scheinbar [2011-10-22 13:44:30 +0000 UTC]

NO!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to scheinbar [2011-10-22 20:22:01 +0000 UTC]

yes is stressed but endures!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rattitude [2011-10-13 02:27:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for posting notebook stuff, nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to rattitude [2011-10-13 17:45:55 +0000 UTC]

Oh you're quite welcome. Thank you for looking and faving.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EintoeRn [2011-10-12 20:46:00 +0000 UTC]

When I look a this one with a scientist's eye, my conclusion is that it is not the "YES!" which is broken here. Sure it happens all the time, million times a day, but certainly not in this case!
This a comforting imformation I should say

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to EintoeRn [2011-10-12 23:09:27 +0000 UTC]

Comforting indeed!

The eyes of scientists are very much to be trusted, especially when they are also the eyes of good friends

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EintoeRn In reply to RichardLeach [2011-10-13 04:41:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pulbern [2011-10-12 15:15:35 +0000 UTC]

What a trip! This is awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to pulbern [2011-10-12 21:57:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! This one has been getting a lot of appreciation, and I like it myself

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LauraTringaliHolmes [2011-10-10 22:54:14 +0000 UTC]

Yes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to LauraTringaliHolmes [2011-10-10 23:27:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wrzosowata-Iro [2011-10-08 15:28:48 +0000 UTC]

"YES"-man?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to wrzosowata-Iro [2011-10-08 20:30:56 +0000 UTC]

A scrappy one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wrzosowata-Iro In reply to RichardLeach [2011-10-09 19:36:31 +0000 UTC]

Yea, I can see that he is very torn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alisinwonder [2011-10-06 15:27:38 +0000 UTC]

cool. i had the same question - is it still a yes or is it a no - is it maybe a definite NO. but, yes - yes - it's a yes. okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to alisinwonder [2011-10-06 18:39:04 +0000 UTC]



at least that's how I see it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alisinwonder In reply to RichardLeach [2011-10-06 19:30:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fredfree [2011-10-04 20:28:44 +0000 UTC]

yes indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to fredfree [2011-10-04 20:37:28 +0000 UTC]

sensei!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to RichardLeach [2011-10-04 20:39:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to fredfree [2011-10-04 20:41:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie [2011-10-03 04:43:07 +0000 UTC]

Maybe it has been too heavily used?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to djailledie [2011-10-03 20:49:55 +0000 UTC]

A yes can only stand so much!

(What a great comment - thank you!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

artairk [2011-10-01 01:20:37 +0000 UTC]

I saw someone on skies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to artairk [2011-10-02 23:40:31 +0000 UTC]

I see that myself now - thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Birgit-Zartl-Photo [2011-09-30 06:45:12 +0000 UTC]

I love the broken YES! beautiful collage

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to Birgit-Zartl-Photo [2011-09-30 13:56:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Birgit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CristianoTeofili [2011-09-29 20:57:20 +0000 UTC]

fantastic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to CristianoTeofili [2011-09-29 23:16:49 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much, Cristiano!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dajono [2011-09-29 20:42:35 +0000 UTC]

this qualifies definitly as a yes...no doubt!
great work!
it really made me curious...
I want to know why the yes is broken
why a red yes, qualifying for what
Who uses the main devices heavily
what is hiding behind the broken yes
601 more questions...
tell me please!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to dajono [2011-09-29 23:19:40 +0000 UTC]

oh if only I could!

thank you very much for your careful look at the piece and for all your unanswerable questions!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dajono In reply to RichardLeach [2011-09-30 10:19:50 +0000 UTC]

My pleassure... colours shapes and details...mmmmm

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thesadstork [2011-09-29 09:39:18 +0000 UTC]

is the torn yes a no?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to thesadstork [2011-09-29 13:07:29 +0000 UTC]

i don't think so!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thesadstork In reply to RichardLeach [2011-09-29 17:12:45 +0000 UTC]

I see

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to thesadstork [2011-09-29 20:19:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thesadstork In reply to RichardLeach [2011-09-30 15:22:26 +0000 UTC]

all seeing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0