HOME | DD

RobCaswell — Into The Eye

Published: 2011-06-08 12:25:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 5128; Favourites: 60; Downloads: 353
Redirect to original
Description This was a surprisingly quick image. For decades I've wanted to do an image of the MacArthur and Lenin dropping into Murcheson's Eye from "The Mote In God's Eye". So here it is.... at least a quick "version 1.0". They may have had their Alderson Drive Fields up during this whole leg of the journey - I don't recall - but if they did, I claim artistic license as this is more fun to look at that two pitch black watermelons in space.


MacArthur mode by Paul Lloyd with optimization by Atra-Hasis. The "Lenin" is actually Bazze's ramjet, flipped on its back, squished in the z-axis and stretched in the x-axis (oh man, I just destroyed the magic again...). 2D-3D composite with Photoshop custom background. DAZ Studio render.

From "Building the Mote in God's Eye" by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, collected in "N-Space" and "A Step Farther Out":

Long ago we acquired a commercial model called “The Explorer Ship Leif Ericsson,” a plastic spaceship of intriguing design. It is shaped something like a flattened pint whiskey bottle with a long neck. The “Leif Ericsson,” alas, was killed by general lack of interest in spacecraft by model buyers; a ghost of it is still marketed in hideous glow-in-the-dark color as some kind of flying saucer.

It’s often easier to take a detailed construct and work within its limits than it is to have too much flexibility. For fun we tried to make the Leif Ericsson work as a model for an Empire naval vessel. The exercise proved instructive.

First, the model is of a big ship, and is of the wrong shape ever to be carried aboard another vessel. Second, it had fins, only useful for at­mosphere flight: what purpose would be served in having atmosphere capabilities on a large ship?

This dictated the class of ship: it must be a cruiser or battlecruiser. Battleships and dreadnaughts wouldn’t ever land, and would be cylindrical or spherical to reduce surface area. Our ship was too large to be a destroyer (an expendable ship almost never employed on missions except as part of a flotilla). Cruisers and battlecruisers can be sent on independent missions.

MacArthur, a General Class Battlecruiser, began to emerge. She can enter atmosphere, but rarely does so, except when long independent assignments force her to seek fuel on her own. She can do this in either of two ways: go to a supply source, or fly into the hydrogen-rich at­mosphere of a gas giant and scoop. There were scoops on the model, as it happens.

She has a large pair of doors in her hull, and a spacious compartment inside: obviously a hangar deck for carrying auxiliary craft. Hangar deck is also the only large compartment in her, and therefore would be the normal place of assembly for the crew when she isn’t under battle con­ditions.

The tower on the model looked useless, and was almost ignored, until it occurred to us that on long missions not under acceleration it would be useful to have a high-gravity area. The ship is a bit thin to have much gravity in the “neck” without spinning her far more rapidly than you’d like; but with the tower, the forward area gets normal gravity without excessive spin rates.

And on, and so forth. In the novel, Lenin was designed from scratch; and of course we did have to make some modifications in Leif Ericsson before she could become INSS MacArthur; but it’s surprising just how much detail you can work up through having to live with the limits of a model.
Related content
Comments: 50

cljohnston108 [2014-01-04 11:58:56 +0000 UTC]

Very nice! But, judging by the Macarthur's name on the wings, some'n got flipped!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to cljohnston108 [2014-01-04 15:49:13 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... the model has some UV issues

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

blacklion68 [2013-07-11 23:20:45 +0000 UTC]

Yes, both ships had their fields up and running. If I remember correctly, the trip was one of those hold you breath til we're there jumps.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to blacklion68 [2013-07-12 15:23:39 +0000 UTC]

Sounds right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ickman [2013-01-11 04:32:19 +0000 UTC]

Hey, did you send a copy/link to Dr. Pournelle? He might appreciate the art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to ickman [2013-01-11 15:35:22 +0000 UTC]

If you've got his addy, please feel free to drop him a line and point him to the page!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ickman In reply to RobCaswell [2013-01-14 04:21:28 +0000 UTC]

Sure will.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lesterwiley [2011-11-15 05:32:19 +0000 UTC]

You can now buy the model of the Ericsson and build it as the "Mystery UFO or a raveger-pirate ship or the Ericsson. It even has the story sheet and lighting kit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to lesterwiley [2011-11-15 17:55:43 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... unfortunately I've come to grips with the reality that most of my plastic modeling days are behind me, even though my basement still looks like a well-stocked hobby store.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lesterwiley In reply to RobCaswell [2011-11-16 01:02:40 +0000 UTC]

Well you can always buy one to display the kit unbilt in the box... As a foot note the disgn was actuly for an unrealized tv pilot by Geoge Pal for a tv war of the worlds sequelin the late sixties. The old Starlog magazine coverd it several years ago, you can find info online.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to lesterwiley [2011-11-16 18:43:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I think I recall reading that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NICELabs [2011-06-24 10:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic! One of my favorite books and when I was 8 or 9 I had that very model. Your rendition is perfect Well done my friend!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to NICELabs [2011-06-25 02:35:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. It's one of my fave reads from my teen years. I think I've read it three times now... and I'm about due for #4!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NICELabs In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-25 04:27:20 +0000 UTC]

indeed.. it's great The younger brother of one of my best friends... he can build anything. When he was little he'd make paper airplanes out of graph paper. I'm talking models of F-16s... toothpicks for the missiles and all... the suckers would fly He's also the one that built the float our arcade had in this past winter's Christmas Parade... in his garage... a 12' tall, 14' wide Recognizer from the original movie TRON. Needless to say, we call him a Motie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to NICELabs [2011-06-25 04:53:47 +0000 UTC]

Ya could just call him "Brownie"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NICELabs In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-25 04:57:41 +0000 UTC]

hehe true, though ironically we've been after him to redesign the coffee area at our arcade snack bar (Sinistarbuck's ) for about a year now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fastmax [2011-06-11 14:58:45 +0000 UTC]

Hey!! It's the -glow in the dark- "Interplanetary UFO" model.
As Kermit the Frog, would say afterwards... "YeAAAAAe!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Fastmax [2011-06-12 02:19:02 +0000 UTC]

See notes to "MJBivouac", above

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GrahamTG [2011-06-11 13:47:19 +0000 UTC]

OOoh very nice !
Reminds me a lot of the covers of those pulp sci fi books my Dad used to leave lying around when I was younger.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to GrahamTG [2011-06-12 02:20:43 +0000 UTC]

Graham.... I AM your Father!!!


Join me and we'll rule DA as Father and Son!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

celticarchie [2011-06-10 02:18:08 +0000 UTC]

'two pitch black watermelons in space' what kind of SF are you reading!?

To quote Dr. Hooper from Jaws: "The men in that boat. They're all gonna die."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to celticarchie [2011-06-10 17:11:08 +0000 UTC]

"Melon Trek: Cruel Harvest"!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

celticarchie In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-10 18:14:02 +0000 UTC]

Must be imported Sci-Fi, there is a lot of dodgy stuff on the black market.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DavidAkerson [2011-06-09 08:24:52 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I recall Arch doing some pics of this design. It was only a matter of time I guess...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to DavidAkerson [2011-06-09 15:33:20 +0000 UTC]

Hm? "Arch"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAkerson In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-09 15:58:59 +0000 UTC]

Ah my bad for using nicknames, I meant

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to DavidAkerson [2011-06-09 16:31:29 +0000 UTC]

Ah - yeah. He did some fun stuff with the model, recently...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

archangel72367 [2011-06-08 22:30:27 +0000 UTC]

Excellent! I knew it wouldn't be long!

I have read some short story collections of Nivin's but I haven't read the Mote books yet. (I feel like I have shamed my B.S. in S.F.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to archangel72367 [2011-06-09 15:32:53 +0000 UTC]

Do NOT read the Mote "books". Read the book.... then spend the rest of eternity avoiding the sequel

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

archangel72367 In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-09 22:53:20 +0000 UTC]

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dmaland [2011-06-08 17:28:59 +0000 UTC]

Simple and excellent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to dmaland [2011-06-09 15:32:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, sir!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MJBivouac [2011-06-08 16:07:05 +0000 UTC]

hey! I recognise that! The Leif Ericson if I remember correctly...and later the UFO Mystery ship...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to MJBivouac [2011-06-09 15:31:53 +0000 UTC]

Yup. That was Niven and Pournelle's acknowledged source for their MacArthur design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MJBivouac In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-09 22:48:12 +0000 UTC]

Is that a fact? I never heard that before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to MJBivouac [2011-06-09 23:50:33 +0000 UTC]

Yep. There was a piece on the making of Mote that was published in Pournelle's old collection, "A Step Further Out" (circa '78). It included details on the ships, like their sources, and also included the unpublished first chapter of the book.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Magnaman1234 [2011-06-08 15:22:47 +0000 UTC]

Artistic Licene is a perfectly legitamate device when it makes for a more interesting image. In fact, it is often compulsory.
I'd like to see your depiction of various types of 'Moties' sometime, too. AFAIK at least, they've never been depicted in art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Magnaman1234 [2011-06-09 15:31:14 +0000 UTC]

I have some motie art by a friend, at home. Yeah, a motie "family picture" could be fun when I get the itch to pick up a pencil

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AbaKon [2011-06-08 15:15:02 +0000 UTC]

Near as I can tell, the Langston Field is pretty much up all the time. Which does make for some simple images but, as you said, creates a drab image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to AbaKon [2011-06-09 15:29:59 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I should do up "the accurate version" for comparison??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AbaKon In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-09 16:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Please don't. That would suck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RobCaswell [2011-06-08 14:58:05 +0000 UTC]

And yes.... the ship name is backwards... so you can easily see what ship is following you in your rear view.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ptrope In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-08 15:07:59 +0000 UTC]

It's an effect of the Eye. yeah, that's it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2011-06-08 15:35:38 +0000 UTC]

Aye-eye!
Ay?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bigmack61 [2011-06-08 14:35:54 +0000 UTC]

They had their fields up, but that would be a boring image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to bigmack61 [2011-06-08 14:40:07 +0000 UTC]

Yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

karanua [2011-06-08 12:40:18 +0000 UTC]

I think your versions better, not quite sure myself about the drive fields being up but that was their usual means of getting around.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to karanua [2011-06-08 12:51:51 +0000 UTC]

They could just be doing a gravitational fall??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

karanua In reply to RobCaswell [2011-06-08 14:13:34 +0000 UTC]

not much control where the eye is involved, gravitational eddies for instance. I can see I'm going to have dig out the box containing the collected works of messirs Niven and Pounelle, excellent works the lot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to karanua [2011-06-08 14:28:13 +0000 UTC]

"Mote" is certainly in my SF top 10.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0