HOME | DD

TheJewishMarxist — Vote By Logic

#politics #opinionstamp #controversial_opinions
Published: 2018-02-06 18:51:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 1244; Favourites: 95; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description

 Warning!   
Possible unfavourable opinion coming through. If you don't like my opinion, get out of here!
If you don't like my opinion, too bad, I'm not going to change my worldview just to please your feelings.


Too many people place emotion over logic when it comes to decision-making for our country.  Things like choosing our leaders as well as impacts on topics can all be influenced by your vote.  I do not deny that emotions play a big role in voting, but I do not support them overtaking logic when it comes to making decisions for our country.

Related content
Comments: 43

Dragonlord-Daegen [2023-02-03 01:54:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

392353 [2020-10-20 15:56:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chibiuverworld [2018-05-22 04:48:17 +0000 UTC]

Most stuff in politics isn't about feelings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RetroSpriteResources [2018-03-24 13:09:19 +0000 UTC]

In other words, vote republican.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NamelessSaint In reply to RetroSpriteResources [2018-04-11 06:00:10 +0000 UTC]

Republicanism is horrid, and it has destroyed the United States.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RetroSpriteResources In reply to NamelessSaint [2018-04-11 09:24:05 +0000 UTC]

No, that was the democrats. Republicans freed the slaves, gave women the vote and kept the union together.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RavenHeart1984 [2018-03-09 18:30:58 +0000 UTC]

good job

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Koimonsters-khaos [2018-02-07 20:18:17 +0000 UTC]

If voting actually did anything they would have outlawed it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kessy-athena [2018-02-07 01:47:42 +0000 UTC]

I'd say facts rather than logic.  The thing about logic is that with the right assumptions you can get logic to say absolutely anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RealDeltaGem In reply to kessy-athena [2020-05-18 13:57:04 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kessy-athena In reply to RealDeltaGem [2020-05-19 20:41:42 +0000 UTC]

It's not even a question of bad logic.  You can use perfectly sound logic to reach completely ridiculous conclusions if your assumptions are wrong.  Consider a simple example:


1 - All A are B.

2 - C is an A.

3 - Therefore C is also B.


The logic of statement 3 is completely correct.  However, whether it is factually correct depends on the validity of the assumptions in statements 1 and 2.  So if we use false assumptions, such as:


1 - All elephants are pink.

2 - Ben Stiller is an elephant.

3 - Therefore Ben Stiller is a pink elephant.


The conclusion in statement 3 is still logically correct, even if it is simply silly.  Fundamentally, logic does not and cannot tell you if things are factually true or false.  It only tells you if a series of statements are consistent with each other and what other statements are consistent with them, which are inconsistent with them, and which may or may not be consistent.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-07 01:15:15 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it is so insane how many Republicans care more about feelings than facts. www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnhJWu…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-07 17:12:41 +0000 UTC]

How do you conclude your claim from that video?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoralisticCommunist In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-08 00:00:57 +0000 UTC]

Because a Republican straight up admitted that he cared more about feelings than the facts. Not to mention, how with Trump's constant charade of claiming all opposition is somehow "fake news", I think it is self-evident just how illogical many Republicans are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-08 17:53:10 +0000 UTC]

Yes, a Republican.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoralisticCommunist In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-09 00:09:08 +0000 UTC]

So is Donald Trump, the President of the United States who a sizeable majority of Republican politician support, just a Republican? I'm not saying that all Republicans believe in feelings over facts, however it's undeniable just how many Republicans will support Trump's many bogus claims

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-09 15:06:36 +0000 UTC]

How many Republicans do support it?
If it is undeniable, it must be a lot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoralisticCommunist In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-10 00:14:41 +0000 UTC]

According to the Gallup poll, 90% of Republicans support Trump. So I think it is far to say that the Republican party bares at least some of the responsibility for Trump's constant barrage of false information. news.gallup.com/poll/226736/sn…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-10 15:25:45 +0000 UTC]

90% is pretty low considering they are his party.

It was significantly less during the nomination. While not as close as Clinton vs. Sanders, Trump did not completely steamroll the competition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoralisticCommunist In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-10 18:01:40 +0000 UTC]

Even if 90% if "pretty low" I'm surprised that more Republicans aren't opposed to Trump. After all, there was supposed to be this big "Never-Trump" movement among Republicans, however except for Evan McMullin who ran as an independent pretty much every Republican just kowtowed to Trump, even Mitt Romney! (www.chicagotribune.com/news/na… )

The fact that there aren't more Republicans standing up to Trump shows just how cowardly they all are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to MoralisticCommunist [2018-02-13 17:46:23 +0000 UTC]

Are you saying less than 90% really support him?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fujin777 [2018-02-06 21:53:42 +0000 UTC]

Seems legit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SE-Roger [2018-02-06 21:08:56 +0000 UTC]

TRIGGERED!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thormemeson [2018-02-06 19:05:38 +0000 UTC]

Said no liberal Democrat ever

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-07 17:12:54 +0000 UTC]

Why liberal Democrats specifically?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-07 17:24:33 +0000 UTC]

Do you not see what they are doing now with antifa?

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-08 17:52:37 +0000 UTC]

What are they doing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-08 20:02:16 +0000 UTC]

Billions of dollars in damage from riots attempted murder and crying about how they are true patriots when they are just useless communist trash sad shilary lost.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-09 15:05:47 +0000 UTC]

And all liberals support that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-09 15:41:14 +0000 UTC]

Liberals are doing that because they lost an election. Hell like the typical left wing retards they are the morons are smashing Starbucks.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-10 15:26:25 +0000 UTC]

What I mean is did the majority of liberals approve the riots?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-10 15:38:57 +0000 UTC]

Have you seen the size of the riots? I mean really what you are basically doing is making up excuses as if that will some how make it untrue. Hell look how sensitive CNN and the DNC are after the State of the Union.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-13 17:39:25 +0000 UTC]

How sensitive are they?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-13 17:57:32 +0000 UTC]

Trump mocked them for walking out and not applauding the military and now act as if he is rounding them up for death camps. Hell how many examples and
information do you before accepting reality?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-13 22:39:07 +0000 UTC]

I do not understand that sentence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-13 23:16:43 +0000 UTC]

Let me guess you are a liberal German socialist who is trying to provoke some kind of emotional reaction from me?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-14 18:26:20 +0000 UTC]

You are 1/4 correct.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-14 19:01:38 +0000 UTC]

Well I am done with you either way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-15 18:29:20 +0000 UTC]

Don' blame me for you not being able to properly back up your argument.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-15 20:32:21 +0000 UTC]

Son you just dismissed all the violence and tantrums because I won't waste my time on you Nazis. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schwarzer--Ritter In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-19 18:19:03 +0000 UTC]

You are using the exact same argument as the other side.
Why are they wrong and you right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to Schwarzer--Ritter [2018-02-19 20:34:46 +0000 UTC]

You seriously ignored the links to proof confirming everything I told you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheJewishMarxist In reply to thormemeson [2018-02-06 19:06:10 +0000 UTC]

Says no anal nutjob and SJW ever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thormemeson In reply to TheJewishMarxist [2018-02-06 19:51:21 +0000 UTC]

Okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 0