HOME | DD

TimeLordParadox — How Titanic sank pre-1985 version

Published: 2012-06-06 09:48:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 6520; Favourites: 28; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The pre-1985 version of how they thought the Titanic actually sank.

Fig i) Titanic strikes the mountainous iceberg at 11:40pm on April 14th 1912

Fig ii) Titanic sustains a 300 foot gash in her starboard side which goes through 6 water tight compartments. (The coal bunker of boiler room 5 is just where the gash ended.)

Fig iii) At around 02:15am on April 15th 1912 Titanic begins her final plunge, the opening of the forward expansion joint causes the forward smoke stack to break loose and collapse.

Fig iv) Around 02:20am the lights go out and the Titanic comes to stand nearly perpendicular to the sea. The stress of being held at such a steep angle caused the boilers to break loose and crash down through the bulkheads, smashing a larger hole in the bow.

Fig v) Shortly after, the lower punctured compartments flooded causing the mighty ship to fall back to a shallower angle and then with little noise the Titanic slid beneath the waves.

Though there is a lot of speculation about this the fact is that in the pre-1985 version of the sinking the Titanic simply did not split in half, the Titanic was too modern and too well built to have its hull break or so it was thought. The break up happened just as the lights went out so visibility was low though most could see the hull settling back after a loud banging noise (Which was put down to the boilers and engines breaking loose and the stern falling back.) very few were probably in the right position or even the right distance to clearly see the stern actually break away from the bow. Those passengers who claimed to have seen the break up were in the minority so their opinions weren’t counted at the inquiries, instead focusing on the testimony of the officers who stated she didn’t break up.

There is also a rumour that Ismay bribed the crew to say the Titanic didn’t break in two –it would make White Star ships seem weak and badly made-, but this has never been proven.

I've also made a short animation of this on youtube [link]
Related content
Comments: 15

Maritimefan101 [2024-02-19 04:12:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

montoya666 [2020-07-06 23:28:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

montoya666 [2018-04-24 04:19:28 +0000 UTC]

Remake this with Titanic honor and glory model and times of events and all the details from this diagram of the sinking of the Titanic pls.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TimeLordParadox In reply to montoya666 [2018-05-13 20:48:03 +0000 UTC]

If only I was that good with computer animations XD

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

johnhenryedenno1fan In reply to TimeLordParadox [2024-05-17 15:56:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RD-DD1843 [2016-05-24 15:50:25 +0000 UTC]

I tend to think that the reason that it was thought to sink in one piece was a bit of wishful thinking by fans of the ship and shipwreck.  They hoped, if and when the ship was found underwater, it would be fairly intact, and recognizable when photographed or filmed.  This ignored people like young Jack Thayer who drew a similar style of drawings (like this) that showed the ship broke in half.  Also that at least one funnel had fallen off when visible.  Also it ignored the explosive quality of the entrapped within the hull which eventually would blow part of the hull out (as it did). 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TimeLordParadox In reply to RD-DD1843 [2016-05-26 22:40:53 +0000 UTC]

Except the Titanic didn't have that many "fans" back then though she did have quite a lot of interest. She was a marvel but she had most of her thunder stolen by the fact that she was twin ship to the Olympic, and her only claim to fame then was just being the largest ship, in terms of media coverage Olympic got much more than the Titanic did.

The reason for the non-split version being adopted was sadly more because people really didn't care and wanted to forget the tragedy as much as possible. There was also no real evidence outside a few testimonies that it had split apart presented at the board of inquiry. Any who thought it did where ignored (probably for the sake of the White Star Lines reputation, a broken ship is not good advertising), so the sinking intact theory became adopted mostly because everyone was trying to put the disaster out of their memory. Then with the release of the book "a Night to Remember" which had the ship sink intact, it popularised that version of the sinking.

True, it's likely that much later in the 70's and 80's when Titanic-mania started to grow that fans found it hard to consider that the ship had broken into 2 pieces and would tune out anyone who said otherwise, including the survivors of the disaster, at least until they found the wreck.

As for the trapped air, it's not so much that they ignored it but more that they didn't know much about what happens deep beneath the surface. They had a fair idea but they didn't have the instruments to test pressures like that. Plus even when they were looking for the Titanic they didn't think trapped air could blast the ship apart and it was only about a decade or so ago that trapped compressed air was discovered to be the reason for the stern blasting itself apart.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RD-DD1843 In reply to TimeLordParadox [2016-05-27 00:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Really nicely answered.  Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LoxB98 [2012-08-08 11:38:23 +0000 UTC]

This is Good! Can I use this as inspiration?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TimeLordParadox In reply to LoxB98 [2012-08-20 10:39:29 +0000 UTC]

Sure, as long as it's not a simple copy of what I've made. Otherwise I'll sue, lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoxB98 In reply to TimeLordParadox [2012-08-20 11:35:13 +0000 UTC]

..ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AceNos [2012-07-17 17:09:15 +0000 UTC]

would it also have destroyed the renault town car that was inside the hold?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TimeLordParadox In reply to AceNos [2012-07-20 08:28:40 +0000 UTC]

I think it would have, if the heavy boilers could smash their way through the bulkheads then a old renault car would stand no chance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AceNos In reply to TimeLordParadox [2012-07-20 14:47:30 +0000 UTC]

I also think the owner, William carter would grieve for the loss of his car if Titanic sank that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KaneTakerfan701 [2012-06-06 12:36:22 +0000 UTC]

incredible!

I've seen many versions of how Titanic sank but not this one.... amazing...... you are so talented in sketching these and I've commented on your video. It was amazing. Surprisingly, this is what I almost wrote in my Titanic fan fiction story before I rewrote it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0