HOME | DD

utkuyzc โ€” hdr tutorial

Published: 2010-03-27 23:33:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 8298; Favourites: 84; Downloads: 150
Redirect to original
Description for my new steve jobs to apple transform video: [link]

click download to download the winrar file. included the nef file, photos and tutorial.
Related content
Comments: 67

utkuyzc In reply to ??? [2011-01-29 01:06:02 +0000 UTC]

thank you

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

frozenplum [2011-01-24 02:10:57 +0000 UTC]

thanks for making this! i must try this out some time

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to frozenplum [2011-01-24 15:43:20 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure let me see your result after you done

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

frozenplum In reply to utkuyzc [2011-01-25 22:51:33 +0000 UTC]

will do!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Jaclav [2011-01-22 00:00:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Jaclav [2011-01-22 11:49:29 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Absinto10 [2011-01-21 22:16:17 +0000 UTC]

very very cool
Checking this soon!!
Good work

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Absinto10 [2011-01-22 11:49:57 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure glad you like it

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Absinto10 In reply to utkuyzc [2011-01-22 20:39:40 +0000 UTC]

Np make sure to go to my profile @ [link]
and send a little feedback too!! thank you man and stay cool!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

lar-dog [2011-01-17 23:52:57 +0000 UTC]

Can you use tone mapping in photoshop cs4?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to lar-dog [2011-01-17 23:58:56 +0000 UTC]

cs4 isn't working well for hdr, i tried, photomatix better, i heard that ps cs5 is really good but i haven't tried it yet you know photomatix enough i think.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Kae-Infinity [2010-11-27 13:58:04 +0000 UTC]

hey, you're awesome! Thanks for sharing!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Kae-Infinity [2010-11-27 14:36:06 +0000 UTC]

oh thank you its my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

yankoa [2010-11-07 11:06:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the great tutorial.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to yankoa [2010-11-09 09:10:13 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

RockQ [2010-10-16 23:11:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for sharing, I gotta try it someday

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to RockQ [2010-10-19 08:18:55 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure show me the result

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Wrane [2010-10-03 00:27:17 +0000 UTC]

I always love to see experts posting tutorials, very cool!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Wrane [2010-10-03 10:25:41 +0000 UTC]

thank you

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

avirama85 [2010-10-01 09:24:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to avirama85 [2010-10-02 22:00:10 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Lazqwalley [2010-09-30 23:05:56 +0000 UTC]

Wow, thank you!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Lazqwalley [2010-10-01 08:21:57 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

gbninja [2010-09-20 01:51:22 +0000 UTC]

HDR really looks beautiful, I wish I could start getting into photography to do it

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to gbninja [2010-09-21 10:30:27 +0000 UTC]

oh why not? thank you so much

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

gbninja In reply to utkuyzc [2010-09-22 00:09:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm really bad at cameras apparently lol.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

gbninja [2010-09-20 01:51:22 +0000 UTC]

HDR really looks beautiful, I wish I could start getting into photography to do it

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

DixonArt [2010-09-13 01:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for this good and simple tutorial

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to DixonArt [2010-09-13 10:36:55 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure buddy

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Mr-Vin [2010-09-12 04:03:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for sharing! great job

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Mr-Vin [2010-09-12 21:35:00 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

lfg2000 [2010-09-11 01:41:13 +0000 UTC]

Useful!!! Iยดm downloading it!!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to lfg2000 [2010-09-11 09:04:13 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much message me if you wanna ask anything

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

lfg2000 In reply to utkuyzc [2010-09-11 11:55:43 +0000 UTC]

much appreciated!!! Thanks to you

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

PuccaNoodles2009 [2010-09-11 01:37:26 +0000 UTC]

thanks, this is cool

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to PuccaNoodles2009 [2010-09-11 09:04:36 +0000 UTC]

it's my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

ImagesByAndrew [2010-08-29 17:40:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for sharing this tutorial workshop with everyone! Here's the link to my version: [link]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to ImagesByAndrew [2010-08-29 17:51:14 +0000 UTC]

oh very good, thank you too man, it's a pleasure to see that

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Creative--Dragon [2010-08-29 08:47:29 +0000 UTC]

Nice tutorial... mind if I add it to and

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Creative--Dragon [2010-08-29 10:44:40 +0000 UTC]

oh it is proud for me, thank you

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Elemento11 [2010-05-22 15:36:25 +0000 UTC]

cool, thanks for sharing...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Elemento11 [2010-05-22 16:37:22 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Metalelf0 [2010-04-22 12:15:52 +0000 UTC]

Hi, I've already tried your technique and the "standard" one with multiple exposures taken directly from the camera. IMHO, the second one gives much better results, and allows more control on the amount of information you want to retain and to discard. E.g., if you want to have a deeper sky, you only take 3 pics, while if you want it smoother you can go for 5 or more (I've even made shots from 13 exposures). For moving objects, you're right, it's difficult, but in standard scenarios Photomatix can handle them pretty well. Of course you need a good, solid tripod for HDR shots, and auto-bracketing is a must. My suggestion is to try this: find a good scenario for HDR (which means, great DOF), take 13 shots in RAW (all the range from -2 to +2), and then try combining them. First, try with one single RAW and extract exposures from it; then, try with the three files. I'm sure you'll see the difference by yourself. Anyway, good tut!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

utkuyzc In reply to Metalelf0 [2010-04-22 13:12:19 +0000 UTC]

oh, thank you absolutely the second one is the best and i know the difference between them, i made lot of hdr's with all technics, i made this tut that is just the easy way to make an hdr for those who asked how can you make this hdr's. but again thank you so much for the comment

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Metalelf0 In reply to utkuyzc [2010-04-22 14:12:32 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome I've started doing HDR only since a year or so, and I'm still not very experienced, but I like it very much

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

LittleBigGiants [2010-04-17 17:37:34 +0000 UTC]

this is total nonsense ... because the entire post is missing in photoshop. because you think it is really easy to do so if you make a visual exposure from 3? You should already include the exposures in the camera ... what you do is simply meaningless pseudo hdr and not the right technique.

you better occupied with the subject before you publish such tutorials and many people believe this.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 4

Athrian In reply to LittleBigGiants [2010-04-18 02:38:42 +0000 UTC]

Actually, the tutorial IMHO is good.
Well ... if i'm have a situation, where there is a lot of movement (eg. strong wind and clouds are on photo,
or people on street) i use that technique. Only difference is that i'm not using photoshop, but Digital Photo Pro
(standard software added to canon with expositions +2, -2, 0). Anyway, if there is much more time and not so many
this are moving i'm doing hdr by merging 3 jpg files (then often i switch from raw to jpg) with backtracking 1,7 etc.
So the tutorial is usable. When i'm using 3 different files (not different exposed files from 1 raw) i also
almost every time i have the same shoot in raw - becouse if sth. will happend to 1 of few photos (moved, new element on it - eg.
people) damn - you can try, but most probobly you will not align this photos into hdr. If you are new to this ...
more likley you will mess up one of photos So for begginer this tutorial can be helpfull.
Btw. sorry for my poor english

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

LittleBigGiants In reply to Athrian [2010-04-18 03:23:14 +0000 UTC]

The best results of you has Athrian.

But it is simply so that one by 3 shots contrasts hinbekommt more than when I made a recording for 2 other press out ... RAW is all well and good but it can not anyway. And with the 3 images from the camera it would look better than at length with the computer generated from the second and third exposures.

and yes you can take steps 0.1 and with the right firmware you can also take 6 bracketing with AEB

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

OzanKurtcebe In reply to LittleBigGiants [2010-04-18 17:24:04 +0000 UTC]

how can you make a hdr photo from a bird when its flying please think before write..

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

LittleBigGiants In reply to OzanKurtcebe [2010-04-18 17:29:07 +0000 UTC]

with ghostmode

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1


| Next =>